On 1 June 2011 23:36, Troy Kisky wrote:
> On 6/1/2011 1:48 AM, Per Forlin wrote:
>> From: Per Forlin
>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/card.h b/include/linux/mmc/card.h
>> index 7b4fd7b..852021c 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/mmc/card.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/mmc/card.h
>> @@ -175,6 +175,7 @@ st
On 1 June 2011 17:59, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Jun 2011, Per Forlin wrote:
>
>> From: Per Forlin
>>
>> Daniel Drake reported an issue in the libertas sdio client that was
>> triggered by the sdio_single_irq functionality. His SDIO device seems to
>> raise an interrupt even though there ar
W dniu 07.06.2011 02:16, Zygmunt Krynicki pisze:
I think at this point we should do some releases. If you agree Zygmunt,
can you do that? (a) because it's nearly the end of my work day and (b)
you're more experienced at it :) I guess this means uploading to pypi
and building in a ppa? Do you upl
On Mon, 2011-06-06 at 20:19 -0400, James Westby wrote:
> On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 18:05:54 -0500, Kate Stewart
> wrote:
> > After every FileName: there should be a FileChecksum: field.
> >
> > For each file listed in the package, the fields that are mandatory and
> > should show up are:
> > - Fi
Hi Kate,
Thanks for the information. I have some responses inline. To be clear
I'm veering in to commentary on the format itself for a lot of this,
rather than specific statements on whether I think Linaro should use it
or not.
On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 18:05:54 -0500, Kate Stewart
wrote:
> If there
On Mon, 2011-06-06 at 16:37 -0400, James Westby wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Jun 2011 14:37:18 -0500, Zach Pfeffer
> wrote:
> > The spec says:
> >
> > 4.6Source Information
> > 4.6.1Purpose: This is a free form text field that contains additional
> > comments about the origin of the package. For instance,
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 3:02 AM, Bernard Ogden wrote:
> I was asked to take a look at the blueprints relating to cross-toolchain
> development (e.g.
> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/linaro-platforms-o-linaro-cross-toolchain-stories)
> in advance of Monday's 'Android and Developer
On Mon, 6 Jun 2011 14:37:18 -0500, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
> The spec says:
>
> 4.6Source Information
> 4.6.1Purpose: This is a free form text field that contains additional
> comments about the origin of the package. For instance, this field
> might include comments indicating whether the package be
On 06/06/2011 05:44 PM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
The .config I'm using is that described on the wiki at
https://wiki.linaro.org/Resources/HowTo/KernelDeploy#From_Linaro_sources
Try disabling CONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL and rebuilding.
If this does fix the problem, this suggests tha
On 6 June 2011 11:45, James Westby wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Apologies for asking you directly what could probably be looked up, but
> the spec isn't very easy to digest.
>
> On Thu, 2 Jun 2011 16:59:46 -0500, Zach Pfeffer
> wrote:
>> PackageName: linux-linaro-omap 2.6.38-1002.3
>> #https://launchpad.net
Hi Zach,
In addition I realised that some of the information requested isn't
explicit in what you propose.
On Thu, 2 Jun 2011 16:59:46 -0500, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
> I went through Kiko's request:
>
>- What kernel tree it was built from
>(A URL to the git tree)
>- What revision
>
On Mon, 6 Jun 2011 16:45:35 +, Fathi Boudra wrote:
> On 6 June 2011 16:30, James Westby wrote:
> > We should put this info somewhere else (use Vcs-* perhaps?) so that we can
> > provide
> > this information for other packages too.
>
> You can add additional user-defined fields to the contro
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 12:17 AM, Ramana Radhakrishnan
wrote:
> On 01/06/11 19:41, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
>> Hello there,
>>
>> This week I initiated a confused conversation during the techleads
>> call about having a way to describe what the hardware pack was built
>> from. We had a c
On 6 June 2011 16:30, James Westby wrote:
> We should put this info somewhere else (use Vcs-* perhaps?) so that we can
> provide
> this information for other packages too.
You can add additional user-defined fields to the control file if it's
required or more convenient.
___
Hi,
Apologies for asking you directly what could probably be looked up, but
the spec isn't very easy to digest.
On Thu, 2 Jun 2011 16:59:46 -0500, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
> PackageName: linux-linaro-omap 2.6.38-1002.3
> #https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-linaro-omap
> PackageDownloadLocatio
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Tixy wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 01:12 -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>> Time to leave 2.6.38 behind and move on! We now have a 2.6.39 based
>> Linaro kernel which can be viewed here:
>>
>> http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=kernel/linux-linaro-2.6.39.git;a=summary
>
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Jun 2011, Andy Green wrote:
>
>> On 06/04/2011 02:17 PM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
>>
>> Hi -
>>
>> > When booted on a Beagleboard-xM, the resulting kernel appears to hang
>> > after "Starting kernel...". I haven't i
On Thu, 2 Jun 2011 23:17:02 +0100, Ramana Radhakrishnan
wrote:
> Sorry I'm getting into this conversation a bit late but is there also
> a need to figure out what toolchain was used to build this hwpack and
> the way in which the toolchain was configured (v7-a, neon, vfp ,
> vfpv3-d16) and what v
On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 08:48:31 +0100, Andy Green wrote:
> At least for the config,
>
> CONFIG_IKCONFIG=y
> CONFIG_IKCONFIG_PROC=y
>
> gets you a gzip of the config used in the kernel body readable by
> scripts/extract-ikconfig externally, and readable at runtime down
> /proc/config.gz. (sta
Thanks for starting this topic Paul.
As we role out Gerrit CI we'll need to host all the components of the
Android build in Gerrit. Users will push their changes to Gerrit and
the changes will automatically get tested and merged after review.
It works pretty good once it all gets going.
As for t
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 6:45 PM, Chris Ball wrote:
> Hi Per,
>
> On Wed, May 11 2011, Per Forlin wrote:
>> From: Stefan Nilsson XK
>>
>> If there is only 1 function interrupt registered it is possible to
>> improve performance by directly calling the irq handler
>> and avoiding the overhead of re
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Daniel Mack wrote:
> On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 6:45 PM, Chris Ball wrote:
>> Hi Per,
>>
>> On Wed, May 11 2011, Per Forlin wrote:
>>> From: Stefan Nilsson XK
>>>
>>> If there is only 1 function interrupt registered it is possible to
>>> improve performance by direct
On Mon, 6 Jun 2011, Andy Green wrote:
> On 06/04/2011 02:17 PM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
>
> Hi -
>
> > When booted on a Beagleboard-xM, the resulting kernel appears to hang
> > after "Starting kernel...". I haven't investigated any further.
>
> Panda chokes the same way with
Hello Nicolas,
On Thu, 2 Jun 2011 23:04:42 +0200
"Dechesne, Nicolas" wrote:
> Paul
>
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 9:24 AM, Paul Sokolovsky
> wrote:
>
> >
> > This is even more interesting, with Google people confirming that
> > repo --mirror works within some bounds and limitations:
> >
> >
> > ht
On 06/04/2011 02:17 PM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
Hi -
When booted on a Beagleboard-xM, the resulting kernel appears to hang
after "Starting kernel...". I haven't investigated any further.
Panda chokes the same way with previously OK omap4_defconfig.
Uncompressing Linux... d
25 matches
Mail list logo
