On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 9:56 PM, Dmitry Antipov
wrote:
> On 02/24/2012 01:44 PM, Ming Lei wrote:
>
>> Could you share us how you reproduced the problem? and which
>> kernel are you used to reproduce it?
>
>
> The kernel is Linus' tree (bb4c7e9a9908548b458f34afb2fee74dc0d49f90),
> .config is attach
* Rajendra Nayak [120223 19:29]:
> On Friday 24 February 2012 12:27 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> >>--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3.dtsi
> >>+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3.dtsi
> >>@@ -113,5 +113,31 @@
> >>#size-cells =<0>;
> >>ti,hwmods = "i2c3";
> >>
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 02:45:48PM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> The following patch checks if there are pending interrupts on the gic.
>
> This function is needed for example for the ux500 cpuidle driver.
> When the A9 cores and the gic are decoupled from the PRCMU, the idle
> routine has to che
On 02/24/2012 07:45 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> The following patch checks if there are pending interrupts on the gic.
>
> This function is needed for example for the ux500 cpuidle driver.
> When the A9 cores and the gic are decoupled from the PRCMU, the idle
> routine has to check if an interrupt
On Thursday 23 February 2012 07:26 PM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On 23/02/12 10:27, Aneesh V wrote:
Ok. Agree. I never used to use %function when I wrote assembly
functions earlier. I am sure a lot of code will break if this was
enforced.
If you've not used %function on ARM, then your code is se
On Thursday 23 February 2012 05:17 PM, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
Aneesh V wrote on 23.02.2012 11:27:40:
The "packed" attribute specifies that all struct elements ought to be
considered to have alignment requirement 1 instead of their default
alignment. Thus the whole struct ends up having alignme
The following patch checks if there are pending interrupts on the gic.
This function is needed for example for the ux500 cpuidle driver.
When the A9 cores and the gic are decoupled from the PRCMU, the idle
routine has to check if an interrupt is pending on the gic before entering
in retention mode
On Friday 24 February 2012 06:32 PM, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
On 2/24/2012 1:58 PM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
On Friday 24 February 2012 06:21 PM, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
On 2/24/2012 12:35 PM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
On Friday 24 February 2012 05:02 PM, T Krishnamoorthy, Balaji wrote:
On Thu, Feb 23,
On 2/24/2012 1:58 PM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
On Friday 24 February 2012 06:21 PM, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
On 2/24/2012 12:35 PM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
On Friday 24 February 2012 05:02 PM, T Krishnamoorthy, Balaji wrote:
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 5:31 PM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
...
+Required prope
On Friday 24 February 2012 06:21 PM, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
On 2/24/2012 12:35 PM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
On Friday 24 February 2012 05:02 PM, T Krishnamoorthy, Balaji wrote:
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 5:31 PM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
Define dt bindings for the ti-omap-hsmmc, and adapt
the driver to
On 2/24/2012 12:35 PM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
On Friday 24 February 2012 05:02 PM, T Krishnamoorthy, Balaji wrote:
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 5:31 PM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
Define dt bindings for the ti-omap-hsmmc, and adapt
the driver to extract data (which was earlier passed as
platform_data) fro
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012, David Vrabel wrote:
> On 23/02/12 17:48, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > Compile events.c and use IRQ 32 to receive events notifications.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini
>
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM
> > +#define IRQ_EVTCHN_CALLBACK 63
> > +irqreturn_t xen_arm_callback(in
On Friday 24 February 2012 05:02 PM, T Krishnamoorthy, Balaji wrote:
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 5:31 PM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
Define dt bindings for the ti-omap-hsmmc, and adapt
the driver to extract data (which was earlier passed as
platform_data) from device tree.
Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 5:31 PM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
> Define dt bindings for the ti-omap-hsmmc, and adapt
> the driver to extract data (which was earlier passed as
> platform_data) from device tree.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/mmc/ti-omap-hsmmc.txt |
On 2/24/2012 5:00 AM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
On Friday 24 February 2012 12:27 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3.dtsi
@@ -113,5 +113,31 @@
#size-cells =<0>;
ti,hwmods = "i2c3";
};
+
+ mmc1: mmc@1 {
+ compatible = "ti,omap2-hsmmc";
+ ti,hwmods
Hi Amit,
> -Original Message-
> From: amit kachhap [mailto:amitdani...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Amit Daniel
> Kachhap
> Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2012 3:44 PM
> To: linux...@lists.linux-foundation.org
> Cc: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; mj...@srcf.ucam.org; linux-
> a...@vger.kernel.org
On 23/02/12 17:48, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> Compile events.c and use IRQ 32 to receive events notifications.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM
> +#define IRQ_EVTCHN_CALLBACK 63
> +irqreturn_t xen_arm_callback(int irq, void *arg)
> +{
> + __xen_evtchn_do_upcall();
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
> On Friday 24 February 2012 03:46 PM, T Krishnamoorthy, Balaji wrote:
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4.dtsi
>>> index 29f4589..9204f60 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 03:56:52PM +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
> I don't know if we can, but even if we could, we take care of the same
> bootargs working on two boards (say sdp and panda) *if* on sdp I have my
> filesystem on eMMC and on panda I have it on external card.
> What happens if I want
On Friday 24 February 2012 03:46 PM, T Krishnamoorthy, Balaji wrote:
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4.dtsi
index 29f4589..9204f60 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4.dtsi
@@ -25,6 +25,11 @@
serial1 =&uart2;
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4.dtsi
> index 29f4589..9204f60 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4.dtsi
> @@ -25,6 +25,11 @@
> serial1 = &uart2;
> serial2 = &uart3;
> serial3 =
Chris,
On Thursday 23 February 2012 04:56 PM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
Re-sending as these patches did not make it to the lists due to
issues with my 'git send-email'
This series mainly cleans up all instances of hardcoding's in
the driver based on pdev->id. This is cleanup leading to the
DT adapt
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 4:23 PM, Dmitry Antipov
wrote:
> On 02/23/2012 04:57 AM, Ming Lei wrote:
>
>> No, it doesn't work with upstream kernel now. You need to apply the
>> patches[1][2]
>> against upstream kernel to route CTIs IRQ so that OMAP4 PMU/perf can work
>> well.
>>
>> [1], http://marc.in
On 02/23/2012 04:57 AM, Ming Lei wrote:
No, it doesn't work with upstream kernel now. You need to apply the
patches[1][2]
against upstream kernel to route CTIs IRQ so that OMAP4 PMU/perf can work well.
[1], http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=132686049213313&w=2
[2], http://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-
24 matches
Mail list logo
