On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 01:44:01AM -0600, Paul Walmsley wrote:
Hello Saravana,
Certainly a Kconfig help text change seems trivial enough. But even the
resistance to CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL has been quite surprising to me, given
that every single defconfig in arch/arm/defconfig sets it:
$
On Tue, March 20, 2012 7:02 am, Shawn Guo wrote:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 11:11:19PM -0700, Mike Turquette wrote:
...
+struct clk_ops {
+int (*prepare)(struct clk_hw *hw);
+void(*unprepare)(struct clk_hw *hw);
+int (*enable)(struct clk_hw *hw);
Hello Arnd,
On Sat, 17 Mar 2012, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
I think it's rather pointless, because the option is not going to
be user selectable but will get selected by the platform unless I'm
mistaken. The platform maintainers that care already know the state
of the framework.
This is where we
Enable core cpuidle timekeeping and irq enabling and remove that
handling from this code.
Signed-off-by: Robert Lee rob@linaro.org
Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com
Reviewed-by: Daniel Lezcano daniel.lezc...@linaro.org
Acked-by: Jean Pihetj-pi...@ti.com
---
On Tuesday 20 March 2012, Kevin Hilman wrote:
Maybe it's time that drivers/cpuidle gets a maintainer. With lots of
discussions of scheduler changes that affect load estimation, I suspect
we're all going to have a bit of CPUidle work to do in the
not-so-distant future.
Hmm, according to the
This patch series moves various functionality duplicated in platform
cpuidle drivers to the core cpuidle driver. Also, the platform irq
disabling was removed as it appears that all calls into
cpuidle_call_idle will have already called local_irq_disable().
These changes have been pulled into
Make necessary changes to implement time keeping and irq enabling
in the core cpuidle code. This will allow the removal of these
functionalities from various platform cpuidle implementations whose
timekeeping and irq enabling follows the form in this common code.
Signed-off-by: Robert Lee
Enable core cpuidle timekeeping and irq enabling and remove that
handling from this code.
Signed-off-by: Robert Lee rob@linaro.org
Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com
Reviewed-by: Daniel Lezcano daniel.lezc...@linaro.org
Acked-by: Jean Pihetj-pi...@ti.com
---
Enable core cpuidle timekeeping and irq enabling and remove that
handling from this code.
Signed-off-by: Robert Lee rob@linaro.org
Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com
Reviewed-by: Daniel Lezcano daniel.lezc...@linaro.org
Acked-by: Jean Pihetj-pi...@ti.com
---
Use core cpuidle timekeeping and irqen wrapper and remove that
handling from this code.
Signed-off-by: Robert Lee rob@linaro.org
Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com
Reviewed-by: Daniel Lezcano daniel.lezc...@linaro.org
Tested-by: Jean Pihetj-pi...@ti.com
Acked-by: Jean
Hello Sascha,
On Sat, 17 Mar 2012, Sascha Hauer wrote:
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 04:21:17PM -0600, Paul Walmsley wrote:
If the common clock code is to go upstream now, it should be marked as
experimental.
No, please don't do this. This effectively marks the architectures using
the
Enable core cpuidle timekeeping and irq enabling and remove that
handling from this code.
Signed-off-by: Robert Lee rob@linaro.org
Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com
Reviewed-by: Daniel Lezcano daniel.lezc...@linaro.org
Acked-by: Jean Pihetj-pi...@ti.com
---
Enable core cpuidle timekeeping and irq enabling and remove that
handling from this code.
Signed-off-by: Robert Lee rob@linaro.org
Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com
Reviewed-by: Daniel Lezcano daniel.lezc...@linaro.org
Acked-by: Jean Pihetj-pi...@ti.com
---
Enable core cpuidle timekeeping and irq enabling and remove that
handling from this code.
Signed-off-by: Robert Lee rob@linaro.org
Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com
Reviewed-by: Daniel Lezcano daniel.lezc...@linaro.org
Acked-by: Jean Pihetj-pi...@ti.com
---
On Tuesday 20 March 2012, Robert Lee wrote:
This patch series moves various functionality duplicated in platform
cpuidle drivers to the core cpuidle driver. Also, the platform irq
disabling was removed as it appears that all calls into
cpuidle_call_idle will have already called
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 12:48 AM, Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com wrote:
Arnd Bergmann arnd.bergm...@linaro.org writes:
On Tuesday 20 March 2012, Robert Lee wrote:
This patch series moves various functionality duplicated in platform
cpuidle drivers to the core cpuidle driver. Also, the platform
Arnd Bergmann arnd.bergm...@linaro.org writes:
On Tuesday 20 March 2012, Robert Lee wrote:
This patch series moves various functionality duplicated in platform
cpuidle drivers to the core cpuidle driver. Also, the platform irq
disabling was removed as it appears that all calls into
Hi Rob,
Robert Lee rob@linaro.org writes:
This patch series moves various functionality duplicated in platform
cpuidle drivers to the core cpuidle driver. Also, the platform irq
disabling was removed as it appears that all calls into
cpuidle_call_idle will have already called
On Tue, 20 Mar 2012, Kevin Hilman wrote:
Looks like you never heard from anyone actively working on at91,
shmobile, kirwood or davinci.
I'm not sure we should merge those platform-specific changes without an
ack from those platform maintainers.
Depends. There is a limit to how long you
Arnd Bergmann arnd.bergm...@linaro.org writes:
On Tuesday 20 March 2012, Kevin Hilman wrote:
Maybe it's time that drivers/cpuidle gets a maintainer. With lots of
discussions of scheduler changes that affect load estimation, I suspect
we're all going to have a bit of CPUidle work to do in the
On Wed, 21 Mar 2012, Amit Kucheria wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 12:48 AM, Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com wrote:
Maybe it's time that drivers/cpuidle gets a maintainer. With lots of
discussions of scheduler changes that affect load estimation, I suspect
we're all going to have a bit of
On 03/21/2012 05:31 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wednesday, March 21, 2012, Amit Kucheria wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 12:48 AM, Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com wrote:
Arnd Bergmann arnd.bergm...@linaro.org writes:
On Tuesday 20 March 2012, Robert Lee wrote:
This patch series moves various
On 03/20/2012 04:53 PM, Turquette, Mike wrote:
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Saravana Kannan
skan...@codeaurora.org wrote:
On Tue, March 20, 2012 7:02 am, Shawn Guo wrote:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 11:11:19PM -0700, Mike Turquette wrote:
...
+struct clk_ops {
+int
On 03/20/2012 08:15 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
On Tue, 20 Mar 2012, Paul Walmsley wrote:
We need to indicate in some way that the existing code and API is very
likely to change in ways that could involve quite a bit of work for
adopters.
[...]
Anyway. It is okay if we want to have some
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com wrote:
Hi Rob,
Robert Lee rob@linaro.org writes:
This patch series moves various functionality duplicated in platform
cpuidle drivers to the core cpuidle driver. Also, the platform irq
disabling was removed as it appears that
So, I suggest that if neither Len nor Arjan reappear shortly, people can
send CPUidle patches to me.
/me reappears
this series is in my tree now, and I'll be poking at it a bit tomorrow.
If everything is happy I'll send it for 3.4.
thanks,
-Len
Hello Nico,
On Tue, 20 Mar 2012, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
This common clk API has been under development for over *two* years
already, with several attempts to merge it. And each previous merge
attempt aborted because someone came along at the last minute to do
exactly what you are doing
Hello Saravana,
On Tue, 20 Mar 2012, Saravana Kannan wrote:
To add a few more thoughts, while I agree with Paul that there is room for
improvement in the APIs, I think the difference in opinion comes when we ask
the question:
When we eventually refine the APIs in the future to be more
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano daniel.lezc...@linaro.org
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle44xx.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle44xx.c
b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle44xx.c
index 0455858..254f97b 100644
---
This patchset is a proposition to improve a bit the code.
The changes are code cleanup and does not change the behavior of the
driver itself.
A couple a things call my intention. Why the cpuidle device is set for cpu0 only
and why the WFI is not used ?
Daniel Lezcano (7):
ARM: OMAP4: cpuidle -
We initialized it at compile time, no need to do that at boot
time.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano daniel.lezc...@linaro.org
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle44xx.c | 26 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle44xx.c
We do not longer need this table as we defined the values
in the driver states.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano daniel.lezc...@linaro.org
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle44xx.c | 11 +--
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle44xx.c
We are storing the 'omap4_idle_data' in the private data field
if the cpuidle device. As we are using this variable only in this file,
that does not really make sense. Let's use the global variable directly
instead dereferencing pointers in an idle critical loop.
Also, that simplfies the code.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano daniel.lezc...@linaro.org
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle44xx.c | 19 ++-
1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle44xx.c
b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle44xx.c
index 254f97b..e14cd56 100644
---
The 'valid' field is never used in the code, let's remove it.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano daniel.lezc...@linaro.org
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle44xx.c |9 +++--
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle44xx.c
The cpuidle API allows to declare statically the states in the driver
structure. Let's use it.
We do no longer need the fill_cstate function called at runtime and
by the way adding more instructions at boot time.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano daniel.lezc...@linaro.org
---
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Daniel Lezcano
daniel.lezc...@linaro.org wrote:
This patchset is a proposition to improve a bit the code.
The changes are code cleanup and does not change the behavior of the
driver itself.
Thanks. Will have a look at your series.
A couple a things call my
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Daniel Lezcano
daniel.lezc...@linaro.org wrote:
The 'valid' field is never used in the code, let's remove it.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano daniel.lezc...@linaro.org
---
It is used during the registration. This field has been very useful for
debug when need to
On 03/21/2012 10:41 AM, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Daniel Lezcano
daniel.lezc...@linaro.org wrote:
The 'valid' field is never used in the code, let's remove it.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcanodaniel.lezc...@linaro.org
---
It is used during the registration. This
+ Jean,
On Wednesday 21 March 2012 02:57 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
The cpuidle API allows to declare statically the states in the driver
structure. Let's use it.
We do no longer need the fill_cstate function called at runtime and
by the way adding more instructions at boot time.
On 03/21/2012 10:36 AM, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Daniel Lezcano
daniel.lezc...@linaro.org wrote:
This patchset is a proposition to improve a bit the code.
The changes are code cleanup and does not change the behavior of the
driver itself.
Thanks. Will have a
On Wednesday 21 March 2012 03:21 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 03/21/2012 10:36 AM, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Daniel Lezcano
daniel.lezc...@linaro.org wrote:
This patchset is a proposition to improve a bit the code.
The changes are code cleanup and does not
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 05:52:08PM +0100, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 13:35:20 +
Sangwook Lee sangwook@linaro.org wrote:
Fix kernel panic from s3c_hsotg_udc_stop.
if udc_is_newstyle is true, s3c_hsotg_udc_stop should not
call disconnect, unbind.
As running
On Tuesday 20 March 2012, Paul Walmsley wrote:
Hello Arnd,
On Sat, 17 Mar 2012, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
I think it's rather pointless, because the option is not going to
be user selectable but will get selected by the platform unless I'm
mistaken. The platform maintainers that care
Daniel,
On Wednesday 21 March 2012 02:57 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
This patchset is a proposition to improve a bit the code.
The changes are code cleanup and does not change the behavior of the
driver itself.
A couple a things call my intention. Why the cpuidle device is set for cpu0
only
On 03/21/2012 10:56 AM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
On Wednesday 21 March 2012 03:21 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 03/21/2012 10:36 AM, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Daniel Lezcano
daniel.lezc...@linaro.org wrote:
This patchset is a proposition to improve a bit the
On 03/21/2012 11:07 AM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
Daniel,
On Wednesday 21 March 2012 02:57 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
This patchset is a proposition to improve a bit the code.
The changes are code cleanup and does not change the behavior of the
driver itself.
A couple a things call my
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Daniel Lezcano
daniel.lezc...@linaro.org wrote:
On 03/21/2012 10:56 AM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
On Wednesday 21 March 2012 03:21 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 03/21/2012 10:36 AM, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Daniel Lezcano
On 03/21/2012 11:49 AM, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Daniel Lezcano
daniel.lezc...@linaro.org wrote:
On 03/21/2012 10:56 AM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
On Wednesday 21 March 2012 03:21 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 03/21/2012 10:36 AM, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:
On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 11:56:23 +0200
Felipe Balbi ba...@ti.com wrote:
Hi Felipe,
This patch is based on Lukasz Majewski's patches:
[PATCH 0/9] USB: s3c-hsotg: USB S3C-HSOTG driver fixes and code
cleanu
This patch shall be placed on top of the above patch series.
Unfortunately those
Basically without this patch changing the mode of thermal zone
is not possible as wrong string size is passed to strncmp.
Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap amit.kach...@linaro.org
---
drivers/thermal/thermal_sys.c |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git
Hi Santosh, Daniel,
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Santosh Shilimkar
santosh.shilim...@ti.com wrote:
Daniel,
On Wednesday 21 March 2012 02:57 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
This patchset is a proposition to improve a bit the code.
The changes are code cleanup and does not change the behavior
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Santosh Shilimkar
santosh.shilim...@ti.com wrote:
On Wednesday 21 March 2012 03:16 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 03/21/2012 10:41 AM, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Daniel Lezcano
daniel.lezc...@linaro.org wrote:
The 'valid' field
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Daniel Lezcano
daniel.lezc...@linaro.org wrote:
The cpuidle API allows to declare statically the states in the driver
structure. Let's use it.
We do no longer need the fill_cstate function called at runtime and
by the way adding more instructions at boot time.
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Santosh Shilimkar
santosh.shilim...@ti.com wrote:
Daniel,
On Wednesday 21 March 2012 02:57 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
This patchset is a proposition to improve a bit the code.
The changes are code cleanup and does not change the behavior of the
driver itself.
On 03/21/2012 02:31 PM, Jean Pihet wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Daniel Lezcano
daniel.lezc...@linaro.org wrote:
The cpuidle API allows to declare statically the states in the driver
structure. Let's use it.
We do no longer need the fill_cstate function called at runtime and
by the
On 03/21/2012 02:19 PM, Jean Pihet wrote:
Hi Santosh, Daniel,
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Santosh Shilimkar
santosh.shilim...@ti.com wrote:
Daniel,
On Wednesday 21 March 2012 02:57 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
This patchset is a proposition to improve a bit the code.
The changes are code
On 03/21/2012 02:43 PM, Jean Pihet wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Santosh Shilimkar
santosh.shilim...@ti.com wrote:
Daniel,
On Wednesday 21 March 2012 02:57 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
This patchset is a proposition to improve a bit the code.
The changes are code cleanup and does not
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 6:49 PM, Jean Pihet jean.pi...@newoldbits.com wrote:
Hi Santosh, Daniel,
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Santosh Shilimkar
santosh.shilim...@ti.com wrote:
Daniel,
On Wednesday 21 March 2012 02:57 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
This patchset is a proposition to improve
On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 16:40:01 +0530, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
Basically without this patch changing the mode of thermal zone
is not possible as wrong string size is passed to strncmp.
Actually it is possible,
$ echo -n disabled mode
works fine. But it fails without the -n, your patch would
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 9:28 AM, Rob Lee rob@linaro.org wrote:
Sekhar tested this patch on Davinci last night and found a problem. I
looked at the code again and found a mindless omission on my part (see
below). Fix is trivial. I've check all other platforms and confirmed
this problem
Sekhar tested this patch on Davinci last night and found a problem. I
looked at the code again and found a mindless omission on my part (see
below). Fix is trivial. I've check all other platforms and confirmed
this problem does not exist for those. Will resend a v9 of the
patchset shortly.
On
Rob, you should start a new '3.4-fixes' branch containing such
bugfixes that can be pushed to Len after -rc1.
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Rob Lee rob@linaro.org wrote:
Sekhar tested this patch on Davinci last night and found a problem. I
looked at the code again and found a mindless
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Jean Delvare kh...@linux-fr.org wrote:
On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 16:40:01 +0530, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
Basically without this patch changing the mode of thermal zone
is not possible as wrong string size is passed to strncmp.
Actually it is possible,
$ echo -n
Hi,
We have a new machine ready to run ci.linaro.org - we just need to
move across the existing data. Since ci.linaro.org just hung we are
going to shut down jenkins and get on with moving the data across. I
hope the next announcement will be that we have a new machine and
everything is running
Hi Eric,
On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 10:47:52 -0400, Eric Paris wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Jean Delvare kh...@linux-fr.org wrote:
Note that a quick grep suggests that drivers/misc/ad525x_dpot.c,
security/selinux/hooks.c and arch/m68k/sun3/prom/console.c suffer from
the same issue, if
Hi Rob,
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 01:52:45, Robert Lee wrote:
Enable core cpuidle timekeeping and irq enabling and remove that
handling from this code.
Signed-off-by: Robert Lee rob@linaro.org
Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com
Reviewed-by: Daniel Lezcano daniel.lezc...@linaro.org
On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 16:14:46 +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 15:13, Jean Delvare kh...@linux-fr.org wrote:
On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 16:40:01 +0530, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
Basically without this patch changing the mode of thermal zone
is not possible as wrong string
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 15:13, Jean Delvare kh...@linux-fr.org wrote:
On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 16:40:01 +0530, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
Basically without this patch changing the mode of thermal zone
is not possible as wrong string size is passed to strncmp.
Actually it is possible,
$ echo -n
Hi all,
Does anybody know how to stop the Gmail webmail frontend from corrupting
sequences of space characters in preformatted text?
When replying to a plaintext mail, Gmail seems to turn every second space into
an ISO8859-1/Unicode non-breaking space character (U00A0). This seems to be a
Not much help but the going work-around is to not use the webmail
interface for this and use mutt, thunderbird, etc. via imap and smtp.
The added advantage there is you can add extensions to linkify bugs
and such for places like launchpad, bugzilla, etc..
J
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 9:55 AM,
Hi Amit,
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 20:06:29, Amit Kucheria wrote:
Rob, you should start a new '3.4-fixes' branch containing such
bugfixes that can be pushed to Len after -rc1.
I think it is OK to send the fixes to Len right away so
he can queue the fixes during merge window if he gets the
I had this happen as well, when using gmail in Chromium for things that I
would cut and paste; however, it did not happen in Firefox. The way I
worked around it was to use Firefox or barring that I would save the email
as a draft, open it back up fix the spaces, then resave as a draft and view
it
On 03/21/2012 02:43 PM, Jean Pihet wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Santosh Shilimkar
santosh.shilim...@ti.com wrote:
Daniel,
On Wednesday 21 March 2012 02:57 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
This patchset is a proposition to improve a bit the code.
The changes are code cleanup and does not
The recent cpuidle consolidation changes erroneously omitted one
critical line of code.
Signed-off-by: Robert Lee rob@linaro.org
---
arch/arm/mach-davinci/cpuidle.c |9 +
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/cpuidle.c
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 12:20:22PM -0400, Amber Graner wrote:
I had this happen as well, when using gmail in Chromium for things that I
would cut and paste; however, it did not happen in Firefox. The way I
worked around it was to use Firefox or barring that I would save the email
as a draft,
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 22:18:25, Robert Lee wrote:
The recent cpuidle consolidation changes erroneously omitted one
critical line of code.
Signed-off-by: Robert Lee rob@linaro.org
Tested this on a DA850 EVM.
Acked-by: Sekhar Nori nsek...@ti.com
Thanks,
Sekhar
On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 15:55 +, Dave Martin wrote:
Does anybody know how to stop the Gmail webmail frontend from corrupting
sequences of space characters in preformatted text?
Apart from never reply to patches via webmail, does anyone know a
workaround?
Have all the Gmail mail
Hi,
The migration of ci.linaro.org to new hardware is complete. We hope
that this will result in a more stable and responsive system. We have
had a few builds run successfully so everything seems to be fine, but
we will be keeping an eye on it. Please let the infrastructure team
know of any
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 11:38:58AM -0700, Saravana Kannan wrote:
So it would be interesting to know more about why you (or anyone else)
perceive that the Kconfig changes would be harmful.
But the enthusiasm of the clock driver developers doesn't
necessarily translate to users of the clock
* Mark Brown broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com [120321 12:11]:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 11:38:58AM -0700, Saravana Kannan wrote:
So it would be interesting to know more about why you (or anyone else)
perceive that the Kconfig changes would be harmful.
But the enthusiasm of the clock
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 01:04:22PM -0700, Saravana Kannan wrote:
Sure, prepare/unprepare are already there in the .h file. But they
are stubs and have no impact till we move to the common clock
framework or platforms move to them with their own implementation
(certainly not happening in
Daniel Lezcano daniel.lezc...@linaro.org writes:
On 03/21/2012 02:43 PM, Jean Pihet wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Santosh Shilimkar
santosh.shilim...@ti.com wrote:
Daniel,
On Wednesday 21 March 2012 02:57 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
This patchset is a proposition to improve a bit
On 03/21/2012 10:54 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
Daniel Lezcanodaniel.lezc...@linaro.org writes:
On 03/21/2012 02:43 PM, Jean Pihet wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Santosh Shilimkar
santosh.shilim...@ti.com wrote:
Daniel,
On Wednesday 21 March 2012 02:57 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 12:41:41PM -0700, Saravana Kannan wrote:
The meaning of clk_enable/disable has been changed and they won't work
without calling clk_prepare/unprepare. So, these are definitely new
APIs. If it weren't new APIs, then none of the general drivers would
need to change.
On 03/21/2012 12:56 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 12:41:41PM -0700, Saravana Kannan wrote:
On 03/21/2012 12:33 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Mark Brownbroo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com [120321 12:11]:
These aren't new APIs, the clock API has been around since forever.
I
On 03/21/2012 12:33 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Mark Brownbroo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com [120321 12:11]:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 11:38:58AM -0700, Saravana Kannan wrote:
So it would be interesting to know more about why you (or anyone else)
perceive that the Kconfig changes would be
On 21 March 2012 19:43, Jean Delvare kh...@linux-fr.org wrote:
On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 16:40:01 +0530, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
Basically without this patch changing the mode of thermal zone
is not possible as wrong string size is passed to strncmp.
Actually it is possible,
$ echo -n disabled
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 10:29:12AM +0800, Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu) wrote:
From: Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu) paul@linaro.org
Anatop is an integrated regulator inside i.MX6 SoC.
There are 3 digital regulators which controls PU, CORE (ARM), and SOC.
And 3 analog regulators which controls 1P1,
89 matches
Mail list logo
