On 11 April 2012 02:09, Alexander Sack wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 6:56 PM, anmar.ou...@linaro.org
> wrote:
> > Hello Fathi:
> >
> > On 9 April 2012 11:15, Fathi Boudra wrote:
> >> We have prepared Linaro Android 12.04 candidates. Spreadsheets have
> >> been updated.
> >> Please, run the t
On 04/11/2012 08:29 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
> On 10 April 2012 17:01, Andy Green wrote:
>> On 04/11/2012 07:41 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
>>> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Christian Robottom Reis
>>> wrote:
On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 08:24:51PM -050
On 10 April 2012 17:01, Andy Green wrote:
> On 04/11/2012 07:41 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
>> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Christian Robottom Reis
>> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 08:24:51PM -0500, Omar Ramirez Luna wrote:
== Omar Ramirez ==
=== Highli
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 5:55 AM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
> Pass minimal data needed for console boot, from dt, for
> OMAP4 panda/sdp and OMAP3 beagle boards, and get rid of the
> static initialization from generic board file.
...
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-generic.c
> b/arch/arm/
On 04/11/2012 07:41 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Christian Robottom Reis
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 08:24:51PM -0500, Omar Ramirez Luna wrote:
>>> == Omar Ramirez ==
>>>
>>> === Highlights ===
>>>
>>> * Working on device tree for mailb
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Christian Robottom Reis
wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 08:24:51PM -0500, Omar Ramirez Luna wrote:
>> == Omar Ramirez ==
>>
>> === Highlights ===
>>
>> * Working on device tree for mailbox:
>>
>> Find a kernel that works with DT for pandaboard (OMAP4):
>> - k3.4
On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 08:24:51PM -0500, Omar Ramirez Luna wrote:
> == Omar Ramirez ==
>
> === Highlights ===
>
> * Working on device tree for mailbox:
>
> Find a kernel that works with DT for pandaboard (OMAP4):
> - k3.4-rc1 doesn't recognize DT blob, k3.3 DT panics at boot.
> - DT has to b
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 6:56 PM, anmar.ou...@linaro.org
wrote:
> Hello Fathi:
>
> On 9 April 2012 11:15, Fathi Boudra wrote:
>> We have prepared Linaro Android 12.04 candidates. Spreadsheets have
>> been updated.
>> Please, run the tests that have a 'w' after them. Thanks!
>>
>> Testers, builds a
Dear ARM fans,
Linaro Developer Platform team organises every week an ARM porting Jam.
Next one will be on Wednesday 11th April (we moved from Friday cause
weekend does not help in remembering which patches are still to send
upstream).
The idea is to gather all developers together to fix user spa
Hello Fathi:
On 9 April 2012 11:15, Fathi Boudra wrote:
> We have prepared Linaro Android 12.04 candidates. Spreadsheets have
> been updated.
> Please, run the tests that have a 'w' after them. Thanks!
>
> Testers, builds and spreadsheets
>
>
> Jon
> https://andro
Looking through the spreadsheets linked to below, it doesn't appear any
results have been logged so far. Please log results in the spreadsheet
ASAP, and ping me and/or the Android team if you run into issues.
Thanks,
Paul Larson
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Fathi Boudra wrote:
> We have pre
Hi Tom,
Could you update that wiki or help me understand that part:
https://wiki.linaro.org/LiveHelper/Cross
"Visit http://launchpad.net/~linaro-maintainers/. Click on the Linaro Overlay
PPA. Click on view package details link which at the beginning of the package
list, right.
This is OK!
"
Hi Matt,
On 2012-03-06, at 5:23 PM, Matt Waddel wrote:
> Hi Kevyn,
>
> On 03/06/2012 02:32 PM, Kevyn-Alexandre Paré wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> With some delay...
>>
>
>
>>> It is worth mentioning that you need a Debian/Ubuntu host
>>> (distribution supporting live-build).
>>> Anyway, if there's an
Amit,
I haven't the faintest clue of how many ARM toolchains I have on the box right
now.
I just grab the latest one I installed.
Regards
-- Pantelis
On Apr 10, 2012, at 1:12 PM, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> Pantelis,
>
> Why would you use anything other than the kick-ass ARM toolchain that Linaro
Pantelis,
Why would you use anything other than the kick-ass ARM toolchain that
Linaro is providing for over a year now? ;-)
/Amit
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 12:46 PM, Pantelis Antoniou <
pa...@antoniou-consulting.com> wrote:
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> I use a somewhat older compiler that doesn't whine so m
Hi Dmitry,
I use a somewhat older compiler that doesn't whine so much, so I don't
see those warnings (don't get me started on how annoying gcc is lately).
Sent me a compile log and I'll fix them.
Regards
-- Pantelis
> panto@orpheus:~/ti$ ${CROSS_COMPILE}gcc --version
> arm-angstrom-linux-gnue
On 04/10/2012 04:54 PM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
Hi -
> TI seems to be happy with the cpuidle driver based on Colin's couple
> C-state work. Santosh has provided a branch at the end of this message
> that is rebased on top of 3.4-rc2. Can we fold this into the TILT tree
> for Ap
On 04/09/2012 09:24 PM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Here's a updated patch for builtin-sched.c that should fix your issues.
Now when you issue list a field will show the amount of nsecs the
task was burning cycles.
It should also fix the crash you've encountered.
Thanks, I'm trying it now.
BTW
Andy,
TI seems to be happy with the cpuidle driver based on Colin's couple
C-state work. Santosh has provided a branch at the end of this message that
is rebased on top of 3.4-rc2. Can we fold this into the TILT tree for April?
Daniel,
You should provided a consolidated version of your fixes and
19 matches
Mail list logo
