On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 06:02:51PM -0700, Mike Turquette wrote:
...
@@ -175,23 +188,32 @@ struct clk *clk_register_divider(struct device *dev,
const char *name,
div-flags = clk_divider_flags;
div-lock = lock;
+ /* allocate the temporary parent_names */
if
On 4/12/2012 6:32 AM, Mike Turquette wrote:
From: Shawn Guo shawn@linaro.org
The clk_ops of basic clks should have const to match the definition
in struct clk and clk_register prototype.
Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo shawn@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Mike Turquette mturque...@linaro.org
On 4/12/2012 6:32 AM, Mike Turquette wrote:
- * If clk has the CLK_SET_RATE_GATE flag set and it is enabled this call
- * will fail; only when the clk is disabled will it be able to change
- * its rate.
Why is CLK_SET_RATE_GATE removed? I already sent a patch to fix clk_set_rate()
for this.
On 4/12/2012 6:32 AM, Mike Turquette wrote:
From: Shawn Guo shawn@linaro.org
Besides the static initialization, the clk_ops of basic clks could
also be used by particular clk type being subclass of the basic clks.
For example, clk_busy_divider has the same clk_ops as clk_divider,
On 4/12/2012 6:32 AM, Mike Turquette wrote:
Documentation/clk.txt has some handsome ASCII art outlining which
clk_ops are mandatory for a given clock, given the capability of the
hardware. Enforce those mandates with sanity checks in __clk_init.
Signed-off-by: Mike Turquette
On 4/12/2012 6:32 AM, Mike Turquette wrote:
From: Shawn Guo shawn@linaro.org
Change clk_register_mux to use kzalloc, just like what all other basic
clk registration functions do.
Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo shawn@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Mike Turquette mturque...@linaro.org
Cc:
On 4/12/2012 6:32 AM, Mike Turquette wrote:
From: Shawn Guo shawn@linaro.org
It makes no sense to have EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL on static functions.
Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo shawn@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Mike Turquette mturque...@linaro.org
Cc: Arnd Bergman arnd.bergm...@linaro.org
On 4/12/2012 6:32 AM, Mike Turquette wrote:
From: Rajendra Nayak rna...@ti.com
Most users of clk_get_rate() actually assume a non zero
return value as a valid rate returned. Returing -EINVAL
might confuse such users, so make it instead return zero
on error.
Besides the return value of
On 11 April 2012 06:10, Andy Green andy.gr...@linaro.org wrote:
Can someone on the LT, working with Omar, take some time to dig into what all
is needed to boot mainline with DT support? I'm a little surprised
too that it doesn't
just work out of the box. :/
Jassi already took a look last
On 11 April 2012 21:17, Omar Ramirez Luna omar.l...@linaro.org wrote:
Can someone on the LT, working with Omar, take some time to dig into what all
is needed to boot mainline with DT support? I'm a little surprised
too that it doesn't
just work out of the box. :/
It would be helpful to
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Andrew Lunn and...@lunn.ch wrote:
Hi Mike
A general question to all these patches.
Do you want to get them into 3.4-rc, or linux-next?
Thanks
Andrew
In 0/13, I think he did ask Arnd to take these in for 3.4-rc even if
they are not strictly bug
On Wed, 2012-04-11 at 23:29 +0400, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
On 04/11/2012 11:19 PM, John Stultz wrote:
On 04/09/2012 03:18 PM, John Stultz wrote:
I went ahead and forward ported the AOSP-3.3 tree to 3.4-rc1.
You can grab it here:
git://git.linaro.org/people/jstultz/android.git
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 06:02:38PM -0700, Mike Turquette wrote:
This series collects many of the fixes posted for the recently merged
common clock framework as well as some general clean-up. Most of the
code classifies as a clean-up moreso than a bug fix; hopefully this is
not a problem since
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Clark, Rob r...@ti.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Nicolas Pitre nicolas.pi...@linaro.org
wrote:
On Fri, 6 Apr 2012, Ricardo Salveti wrote:
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 6:05 AM, Wookey woo...@wookware.org wrote:
The fundamental question really is 'are
Hi, All
LAVA is an automated validation architecture, and it now has a test
framework for running android test tools and parsing the test output.
Please NOTE that lava-android-test is just used for running the test tools,
parsing the test output, and formatting the test result.
Here I will
On Thursday 12 April 2012, Mike Turquette wrote:
This series collects many of the fixes posted for the recently merged
common clock framework as well as some general clean-up. Most of the
code classifies as a clean-up moreso than a bug fix; hopefully this is
not a problem since the common clk
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 11:03:49AM -0500, Omar Ramirez Luna wrote:
'domain_destroy with devices attached' case isn't yet handled, instead
code assumes that the device was already detached.
If the domain is destroyed the hardware still has access to invalid
pointers to its page table and
Hi Jeremiah,
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:58 AM, Jeremiah Foster
jeremiah.fos...@pelagicore.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Clark, Rob r...@ti.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Nicolas Pitre nicolas.pi...@linaro.org
wrote:
On Fri, 6 Apr 2012, Ricardo Salveti wrote:
On Fri,
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 11:14:38AM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Thursday 12 April 2012, Mike Turquette wrote:
This series collects many of the fixes posted for the recently merged
common clock framework as well as some general clean-up. Most of the
code classifies as a clean-up moreso
Hi Jon,
On 04/12/2012 12:54 PM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
On Wed, 2012-04-11 at 23:29 +0400, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
On 04/11/2012 11:19 PM, John Stultz wrote:
On 04/09/2012 03:18 PM, John Stultz wrote:
I went ahead and forward ported the AOSP-3.3 tree to 3.4-rc1.
You can grab it here:
On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 17:37 +0400, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
Yes, the 12.04 release is going to be 3.4-rcX based. And indeed, there
were some conflicts when I tried rebasing your current topic branches
onto current mainline master branch (the vexpress-device-tree and the
hdlcd topics). It
Awesome YongQin.
Put this email in a Wiki:
https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/Android/IntegrateATestIntoLava
On 12 April 2012 05:51, YongQin Liu yongqin@linaro.org wrote:
Hi, All
LAVA is an automated validation architecture, and it now has a test
framework for running android test tools
On 04/12/2012 05:57 PM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 17:37 +0400, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
Yes, the 12.04 release is going to be 3.4-rcX based. And indeed, there
were some conflicts when I tried rebasing your current topic branches
onto current mainline master branch (the
The only thing that changed in my setup, Virtualbox,
scratchbox2, arm debian rootfs qemu-linaro is that i
pulled a newer version than march 30th and i went from some
expected errors http://pastebin.com/QTt8S9kT to
http://pastebin.com/2SRJRvdp
not really sure where to even start tracking it
From: Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu) paul@linaro.org
This patch adds device-tree support for dialog MFD and the binding
documentations.
Signed-off-by: Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu) paul@linaro.org
Cc: Samuel Ortiz sa...@linux.intel.com
Cc: Shawn Guo shawn@linaro.org
Cc: Ashish Jangam
From: Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu) paul@linaro.org
This patch adds device tree support for dialog regulators
Signed-off-by: Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu) paul@linaro.org
Cc: Mark Brown broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com
Cc: Liam Girdwood l...@ti.com
Cc: Samuel Ortiz sa...@linux.intel.com
Cc: Shawn
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 11:39:41PM +0800, Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu) wrote:
+- compatible : Should be dialog,da9052, dialog,da9053-aa,
+ dialog,da9053-ab, or dialog,da9053-bb
This is generally the stock ticker symbol so DLG for Dialog.
+Sub-nodes:
+- regulators : Contain
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 11:39:42PM +0800, Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu) wrote:
+#ifdef CONFIG_OF
+ struct device_node *nproot = da9052-dev-of_node;
+ struct device_node *np;
+ int c;
+
+ if (!nproot) {
+ ret = -ENODEV;
+
On 4/12/2012 11:47 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 12 April 2012 16:22, Russell Keith Davisruss...@russelldavis.org wrote:
The only thing that changed in my setup, Virtualbox, scratchbox2, arm debian
rootfs qemu-linaro is that i pulled a newer version than march 30th and i
went from some expected
On 12 April 2012 17:08, Russell Keith Davis russ...@russelldavis.org wrote:
On 4/12/2012 11:47 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
If you can provide me with an easy way to reproduce this on my machine
I can have a look at it.
I don't actually use qemu on real hardware so not 100% sure it is a
Matt,
The last release of Tom fix the problem!
KA
On 2012-04-10, at 10:54 AM, Kevyn-Alexandre Paré wrote:
Hi Matt,
On 2012-03-06, at 5:23 PM, Matt Waddel wrote:
Hi Kevyn,
On 03/06/2012 02:32 PM, Kevyn-Alexandre Paré wrote:
Hi,
With some delay...
snip
It is worth
Thx Tom,
your last release fix my problem during the sh ./conf_create.sh!
KA
On 2012-04-10, at 11:56 AM, Kevyn-Alexandre Paré wrote:
Hi Tom,
Could you update that wiki or help me understand that part:
https://wiki.linaro.org/LiveHelper/Cross
Visit
You are very welcome. If you need anything else just let me know.
Regards,
Tom
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:56 PM, Kevyn-Alexandre Paré
kap...@rogue-research.com wrote:
Thx Tom,
your last release fix my problem during the sh ./conf_create.sh!
KA
On 2012-04-10, at 11:56 AM, Kevyn-Alexandre
Hello,
I am interested to know if anyone from Linaro has attempted using
Flyswatter2 on origen board. I am trying to use openocd for origen
board, and found issues as early as in reading tapid. Any pointers/help
on this is appreciated.
Note: I saw some discussion on this in irc-logs, but I
34 matches
Mail list logo
