On Thu, 2012-06-07 at 12:45 -0700, John Stultz wrote:
Tixy: My attention on this issue has been somewhat limited. You've been
by far the most involved in helping deploy config fragments (though, I
don't want to be punishing good behavior by suggesting this, so feel
free to say no! :),
Hi John,
On 06/07/2012 11:45 PM, John Stultz wrote:
On 06/06/2012 07:09 AM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
Are we going to start using the config fragments we created a while ago?
(Or did we not reach consensus on that?)
I wouldn't say there was a strong consensus. But I think we should push
to
Hi all,
It is our intention to take https://ci.linaro.org offline for about 15
minutes at 12:00 UTC
(http://www.worldtimeserver.com/current_time_in_UTC.aspx) in an effort
to fix https://bugs.launchpad.net/linaro-ci/+bug/959945 .
If the downtime will cause you significant problems, please get in
Use trace_find_event to find event name before looking through
/sys files. This helps 'perf report' to show real event names
instead of 'unknown:unknown' when processing perf.data recorded
on another machine.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Antipov dmitry.anti...@linaro.org
---
tools/perf/builtin-report.c
Greetings,
There will be three linux-linaro trees this month. Also some LTs have
moved to 3.5, while the others will stay on older kernels.
In addition to linux-linaro-core-tracking and linux-linaro ones
(described under
On Thu, 2012-06-07 at 12:45 -0700, John Stultz wrote:
On 06/06/2012 07:09 AM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
Are we going to start using the config fragments we created a while ago?
(Or did we not reach consensus on that?)
I wouldn't say there was a strong consensus. But I think we should push
On 06/08/2012 08:25 PM, the mail apparently from Andrey Konovalov included:
Greetings,
There will be three linux-linaro trees this month. Also some LTs have
moved to 3.5, while the others will stay on older kernels.
In addition to linux-linaro-core-tracking and linux-linaro ones
(described
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 7:07 AM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) t...@linaro.org wrote:
On Thu, 2012-06-07 at 12:45 -0700, John Stultz wrote:
On 06/06/2012 07:09 AM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
Are we going to start using the config fragments we created a while ago?
(Or did we not reach consensus on
On Fri, 2012-06-08 at 08:15 -0600, John Rigby wrote:
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 7:07 AM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) t...@linaro.org wrote:
Have a branch called config-core-tracking which will contain
linaro-base.conf
ubuntu.conf
android.conf
I think I missed something in an earlier thread.
Hi, Any clue or pointers to solve this issue?
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Bharathi Subramanian wrote:
Hi All,
I am using Linaro 11.11 Gingerbread with 10 LCD and touchscreen. In
that, the Android Virtual Keyboard is not visible fully on the screen.
So unable to type Text in SMS or URL in
Hi Bharathi,
It is an issue with the soft keyboard. Can you install ICS keyboard apk .
It should work well on GB releases.
Regards,
Vishal
On 8 June 2012 20:38, Bharathi Subramanian bharathi.l...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, Any clue or pointers to solve this issue?
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 5:37 PM,
On Fri, 2012-06-08 at 08:15 -0600, John Rigby wrote:
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 7:07 AM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) t...@linaro.org wrote:
Now, if the Ubuntu kernel packaging scripts could gain an option to
generate a config from these fragments... :-)
That will happen soon.
I should point out that
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 9:25 AM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) t...@linaro.org wrote:
On Fri, 2012-06-08 at 08:15 -0600, John Rigby wrote:
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 7:07 AM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) t...@linaro.org wrote:
Now, if the Ubuntu kernel packaging scripts could gain an option to
generate a config
Move this specific flag to the header file.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano daniel.lezc...@linaro.org
---
drivers/idle/intel_idle.c |8
include/linux/cpuidle.h |7 +++
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/idle/intel_idle.c
We have the state index passed as parameter to the 'enter' function.
Most of the drivers assign their 'enter' functions several times in
the cpuidle_state structure, as we have the index, we can delegate
to the driver to handle their own callback array.
That will have the benefit of removing
We have a flag field for each cpuidle state but we don't use it
for the 'disabled' states. Let's remove the integer field and use
the flag field.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano daniel.lezc...@linaro.org
---
drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c|1 -
drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c |5 +++--
The 'enter_dead' function is only used for processor_idle.c
and the same function is used several times. We fall into the
same abuse with the multiple callbacks for the same function.
This patch fixes that by moving the 'enter_dead' function to the
driver structure. A flag CPUIDLE_FLAG_DEAD_VALID
Hi Daniel,
On 06/08/2012 09:32 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
We have the state index passed as parameter to the 'enter' function.
Most of the drivers assign their 'enter' functions several times in
the cpuidle_state structure, as we have the index, we can delegate
to the driver to handle their
On 06/08/2012 07:33 PM, Deepthi Dharwar wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Hi Deepthi,
On 06/08/2012 09:32 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
We have the state index passed as parameter to the 'enter' function.
Most of the drivers assign their 'enter' functions several times in
the cpuidle_state structure, as we
19 matches
Mail list logo
