in 13.10.
Best regards,
Ola
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 7:25 AM, Deepak Saxena dsax...@linaro.org wrote:
I'm working on getting my new build system up and running and with
13.10. Running any of our toolchain commands leads to No such file or
directory. I'm guessing this has to with my system
On 12 November 2013 05:49, Nicolas Dechesne nicolas.deche...@linaro.org wrote:
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Ryan Harkin ryan.har...@linaro.org wrote:
On 12 November 2013 06:25, Deepak Saxena dsax...@linaro.org wrote:
I'm working on getting my new build system up and running
?
Thanks,
~Deepak
--
Deepak Saxena - Kernel Working Group Lead
Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman
://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
--
Deepak Saxena - Kernel Working Group Lead
Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http
in regards to not sending patches to linaro-dev. I see
lots of patches being posted on here and think it is a good place for
discussion.
Thanks,
~Deepak
--
Deepak Saxena - Kernel Working Group Lead
Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro
used for Android 'stuff', see
http://review.android.git.linaro.org/
--
Jonathan Aquilina
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
--
Deepak Saxena - Kernel Working Group
On 29 June 2012 12:44, Rajanikanth HV rajanikanth...@linaro.org wrote:
thanks for your review comments, i will post it on public branch,
Posting on a public branch once you have your git issues sorted is
good, but we want the patches themselves posted on the relevant email
lists. Please make the
On 3 May 2012 06:50, Arnd Bergmann a...@arndb.de wrote:
Hi everyone,
I've been discussing multiplatform kernels with a few people recently,
and we will have a lot of discussion sessions about this at Linaro
Connect in Hong Kong.
One question that came up repeatedly is whether we should
On 24 April 2012 03:22, David Rusling david.rusl...@linaro.org wrote:
All,
I've created and shared the Connection Sessions spreadsheet, you can find it
here
- https://docs.google.com/a/linaro.org/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AnK-Uyci_D20dFlUX1ZOVm5LWDVudkxJM1B0aS1FWWc#gid=0.
Arwen is happy that
On 19 April 2012 12:58, Zach Pfeffer zach.pfef...@linaro.org wrote:
On 19 April 2012 14:47, Deepak Saxena dsax...@linaro.org wrote:
On 19 April 2012 12:15, Zach Pfeffer zach.pfef...@linaro.org wrote:
On 19 April 2012 13:21, Deepak Saxena dsax...@linaro.org wrote:
On 19 April 2012 08:53
On 19 April 2012 08:53, Christian Robottom Reis k...@linaro.org wrote:
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 10:43:56AM -0500, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
While we're planning for connect, I'd like to suggest that we do away
with team tracks all together and just have topic tracks. This would
align with our topic
On 19 April 2012 12:15, Zach Pfeffer zach.pfef...@linaro.org wrote:
On 19 April 2012 13:21, Deepak Saxena dsax...@linaro.org wrote:
On 19 April 2012 08:53, Christian Robottom Reis k...@linaro.org wrote:
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 10:43:56AM -0500, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
While we're planning
== Deepak Saxena dsaxena ==
=== Highlights ===
* Completed reviews!
* Worked with Kiko on Android Upstreaming patch tracking. Still have
mixed feelings
about whether every single patch needs to be tracked to help stay on top of
deliverables but will give it a try, might get some ideas
On 10 April 2012 17:01, Andy Green andy.gr...@linaro.org wrote:
On 04/11/2012 07:41 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Christian Robottom Reis
k...@linaro.org wrote:
On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 08:24:51PM -0500, Omar Ramirez Luna wrote:
== Omar Ramirez
On 4 April 2012 09:54, Chris Simmonds chris.simmo...@2net.co.uk wrote:
On 04/04/12 11:53, Amit Kucheria wrote:
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Chris Simmonds
chris.simmo...@2net.co.uk wrote:
Hello,
I am working on behalf of an SoC vendor and I am trying to work out which
(if any) of the
The Linaro Kernel Working Group (KWG) and the Linaro Platform
Group are excited to announce the availability our February 2012
development snapshot:
linux-linaro-3.3-rc3-2012.02-1
As the word snapshot implies, these are meant as development kernels
and have not been fully validated. You should
The Linaro Kernel Working Group (KWG) is excited to announce the
availability our January 2012 development snapshot:
linux-linaro-3.2-2021.01-0
As the word snapshot implies, these are meant as development kernels
and have not been fully validated. You should expect issues and to help
us deliver
On 15 December 2011 06:27, Nicolas Pitre nicolas.pi...@linaro.org wrote:
On Thu, 15 Dec 2011, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
On Thu, 15 Dec 2011, Will Deacon wrote:
Rather than me point each landing team at the patches, would you be able
to cherry-pick the fixes from mainline please? They are:
The Linaro Kernel Working Group (KWG) is excited to announce the
availability our December 2011 development snapshot:
linux-linaro-3.1-2011.12-1
As the word snapshot implies, these are meant as development kernels
and have not been fully validated. You should expect issues and to help
us deliver
Hi Michael,
I went to take a look at the kernel ci-loop page to see the build
status of upstream builds and have a few new comments on
the UIL
1) When there is a build failure, is it possible to have
the build link go directly to the build results?
It currently takes 3 clicks to get to
Thanks for this info Deepti. I'm assuming this is the same reason I
had issues logging into the summit scheduler.
~Deepak
On 31 October 2011 03:42, Deepti Kalakeri deepti.kalak...@linaro.org wrote:
Hello,
OpenID plugin usage has been disabled in ci.linaro.org due to some
vulnerability
The Linaro Kernel Working Group (KWG) is excited to announce the
availability of our September 2011 development snapshot:
linux-linaro-3.0-2011.09-0
As the word snapshot implies, these are meant as development kernels
and have not been fully validated. You should expect issues and to help
us
A group of us met at Linux Plumber's Conf two weeks ago to
discuss struct clk and how we move forward with it. Several
of us had a follow up phone call last week, on Wed the 14th,
and what follows are meeting notes from this follow up
discussion (I've seem to have lost the notepad on which I
[Resend with update of l-a-k address in my alias to the correct
one on infradead].
A group of us met at Linux Plumber's Conf two weeks ago to
discuss struct clk and how we move forward with it. Several
of us had a follow up phone call last week, on Wed the 14th,
and what follows are meeting
Will this patch and the patch Tushar just posted apply
cleanly with each other? You are both touching mach-origen.c,
changing origen_devices, and adding support for video output
so it might be good in a future situations such as this to
post as one patch series with both of your sign-offs.
The Linaro Kernel Working Group (KWG) is excited to announce the
availability of our August 2011 development snapshot:
linux-linaro-3.0-2011.08-0
As the word snapshot implies, these are meant as development kernels
and have not been fully validated. You should expect issues and to help
us
Hi all,
I wanted to provide an update of what the kernel team accomplished at
Linaro Connect last week for those who were unable to attend.
The team was split into two main groups, the first being led by Grant
Likely and focusing on continuing the work on enabling Device Tree
support on ARM
On 5 August 2011 14:40, Rob Herring robherri...@gmail.com wrote:
Deepak, Nicolas,
On 07/27/2011 09:58 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
To everyone, and especially to those who are expected to work on this
topic next week, please find below a list of tasks that needs to be
investigated and/or
On 21 July 2011 15:08, john stultz johns...@us.ibm.com wrote:
On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 22:57 -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
Please let me know if you want to see something merged into the
linaro-3.0 tree before Thursday.
So I'm working on merging this into the Android tree and something in
your
On 21 July 2011 16:47, john stultz johns...@us.ibm.com wrote:
On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 16:34 -0700, john stultz wrote:
On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 15:18 -0700, Deepak Saxena wrote:
On 21 July 2011 15:08, john stultz johns...@us.ibm.com wrote:
On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 22:57 -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote
On 8 July 2011 12:50, john stultz johns...@us.ibm.com wrote:
On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 12:35 -0700, Deepak Saxena wrote:
On 1 July 2011 12:14, Deepak Saxena dsax...@linaro.org wrote:
Each of the trees have various tags and branches based on how each
team and developer
works and I don't want
On 1 July 2011 12:21, Andy Green andy.gr...@linaro.org wrote:
On 07/01/2011 08:14 PM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
What I'd like to see is a a separate set of official trees that only
get updated with bits that
we are ready for non-Linaro developers to use, do not get rebased,
Hi all,
I was looking at git.linaro.org and I'd like to propose some consistency
in naming our git trees and in how we branch them. The main reason
for this from my perspective is to make it easy to point someone
from a partner team or from a partner''s customer to the git server and
have them
The Linaro Kernel Working Group (KWG) is excited to announce the
availability our June 2011 development snapshot:
linux-linaro-2.6.39-2011.06-0
As the word snapshot implies, these are meant as development kernels
and have not been fully validated. You should expect issues and to help
us deliver
On 23 June 2011 08:51, Andy Green andy.gr...@linaro.org wrote:
Hi -
I mentioned this already to npitre but for various reasons we are planning
to target 3.0 kernel rather than linux-linaro-2.6.39 at the moment. 2.6.39
has some known issues like no onboard audio or HDMI audio, but since 3.0
On 23 June 2011 11:39, Nicolas Pitre nicolas.pi...@linaro.org wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011, Andy Green wrote:
When linux-linaro-3.0 is coming in the next weeks, we will use that as a base
instead as before.
The base will be just as good as the contributions made by people to it.
And besides a
On 14 June 2011 15:16, Mounir Bsaibes mounir.bsai...@linaro.org wrote:
Nico,
Is there any dependency on the Toolchain WG?
Does the latest kernel have to be built using the latest Toolchain release?
Good question. As we get the CI loop going, I imagine that we'll want the
kernel building with
On 2 June 2011 19:01, Zach Pfeffer zach.pfef...@linaro.org wrote:
On 2 June 2011 18:55, Nicolas Pitre nicolas.pi...@linaro.org wrote:
On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, John Rigby wrote:
I noticed all the fine AndyDoan/Ricardo fixes that make panda
wonderful are missing. My question now is should that
On 1 June 2011 11:41, Christian Robottom Reis k...@linaro.org wrote:
I seem to be hung up on having a way of saying this hardware pack's
kernel was built from this git tree with this config, so I wanted to
explore the use cases a bit more:
- My #1 use case is, once I've installed a
On 1 June 2011 12:58, Christian Robottom Reis k...@linaro.org wrote:
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 12:51:12PM -0700, Deepak Saxena wrote:
All official Linaro builds are generated from a single git tree that
has branches for different kernel versions that we build from being
automatically updated
On 30 May 2011 08:48, Zach Pfeffer zach.pfef...@linaro.org wrote:
On 27 May 2011 11:45, Deepak Saxena dsax...@linaro.org wrote:
On 26 May 2011 20:17, Zach Pfeffer zach.pfef...@linaro.org wrote:
My only comment is on:
What We're Not Doing
Integrating graphics drivers
● Handled by vendor
The Linaro Kernel Working Group (KWG) is excited to announce the
availability our May 2011 development snapshot: linux-linaro-11.05-2.6.38
This is the first of a new monthly series of development snapshots from
the KWG that will provide a way for developers to work with the Linaro
kernels without
On 25 May 2011 04:18, Dave Martin dave.mar...@linaro.org wrote:
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 07:42:43PM -0700, Deepak Saxena wrote:
Hi all,
The Kernel Working Group is getting ready to release the first of our new
monthly development snapshot in a few days and we would like folks
to do some quick
On 25 May 2011 03:29, Tixy t...@yxit.co.uk wrote:
On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 19:42 -0700, Deepak Saxena wrote:
The Kernel Working Group is getting ready to release the first of our new
monthly development snapshot in a few days and we would like folks
to do some quick sanity boot testing
Hi all,
The Kernel Working Group is getting ready to release the first of our new
monthly development snapshot in a few days and we would like folks
to do some quick sanity boot testing on their boards. Please
grab or update the kernel from
git://git.linaro.org/kernel/linux-linaro-2.6.38.git,
and
45 matches
Mail list logo
