Neil responded to this thread and his email got auto-discarded from the list due
to some configuration glitch in linaro-dev list, which should be fixed now.
Copying his email here to make sure it reaches the interested recipients.
--
viresh
-8<-
On 18 August 2017 at 12:03, Dai Xiang <xiangx@intel.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 11:59:47AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> On 18 August 2017 at 11:52, Dai Xiang <xiangx@intel.com> wrote:
>> > Cool, after use this kernel_cmdline, 4\5\6\8 can pass
On 18 August 2017 at 11:52, Dai Xiang wrote:
> Cool, after use this kernel_cmdline, 4\5\6\8 can pass now, but 1\7\9 still
> can not:
Why do you say that 4/5/6/8 have passed ?
> cpufreq_01.0/cpu0: checking 'scaling_available_frequencies' exists in
>
On 18 August 2017 at 11:48, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> I don't know the passive / active mode but the path changed.
>
> /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy[0-9]/scaling_driver
Naah, we wouldn't have broken userspace like that :)
$ ls -l
On 18 August 2017 at 11:11, Dai Xiang wrote:
> In fact, i has used intel_pstate driver:
> $ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_driver
> intel_pstate
It may be running in *active* mode and you need to put it in *passive* mode.
Try passing following with
On 18 August 2017 at 08:33, Dai Xiang wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I test with below two cpu to test:
> - Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7-8890 v4 @ 2.20GHz
> - Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2697 v2 @ 2.70GHz
>
> With below action:
> make -C cpuidle cpuidle_killer
> make -C cpufreq run_tests
>
> And
On 11-12-15, 20:25, Ryan wrote:
> I am referring to the thread:
>
> https://lists.linaro.org/pipermail/linaro-dev/2012-September/013311.html
>
> I am facing the exact issue and i want to check where it is hanging.
>
> Am not sure if it is hanging at the xloader or not.
>
> Do i need to build
On 2 December 2014 at 12:34, pi-cheng.chen pi-cheng.c...@linaro.org wrote:
Add 2 new kind of event for running a memory or a io bounded load.
mem name for a load is memory bounded, and iorun name for a load is io
bounded. The default file to be written to create the load is /dev/null and
the
On 2 December 2014 at 12:51, pi-cheng.chen pi-cheng.c...@linaro.org wrote:
Add 2 new kind of event for running a memory or a io bounded load.
mem name for a load is memory bounded, and iorun name for a load is io
bounded. The default file to be written to create the load is /dev/null and
the
On 4 June 2014 18:29, Sanjay Singh Rawat sanjay.ra...@linaro.org wrote:
check for the timer interrupt raised on cpu for duration of
3 seconds and report the mode
Issues with this approach:
- Currently even with NO_HZ_FULL we will get rid of tick only for 1 second
- You may also false report
On 30 May 2014 21:20, Sriram V vshrir...@gmail.com wrote:
I am looking at in cpufreq.c
__cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP);
up_write(policy-rwsem);
__cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT);
down_write(policy-rwsem);
Why do we need to
On 26 May 2014 10:53, Ryan ryanphilip...@googlemail.com wrote:
Thanks for your help.
Your welcome..
I was trying to print the policy pointer of each cpu - and it points
to the same address for all cpus.
Good, so all CPUs are sharing the same clock line in your case. You
are probably using an
On 23 April 2014 17:11, Sanjay Singh Rawat sanjay.ra...@linaro.org wrote:
Signed-off-by: Sanjay Singh Rawat sanjay.ra...@linaro.org
---
- This will help in catching issue like https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/25/122
- Tested on my x86 dev m/c
Output:
running hotplug stress on cpu : cpu1
pass:
On 24 April 2014 10:01, Sanjay Singh Rawat sanjay.ra...@linaro.org wrote:
On hotplug, all the tasks/works/timers/hrtimers are migrated to other
online CPUs..
hmm thanks, was thinking what could lead to the freeze then.
Hmm.. So you are actually debugging a problem here? I thought it is
yet
On 9 January 2014 02:30, Mathieu Poirier mathieu.poir...@linaro.org wrote:
On 8 January 2014 13:35, Sriram V vshrir...@gmail.com wrote:
I am seeing a behaviour where the load variations are very frequency
between 1ghz and 300mhz in a very short interval of time giving the
ping-pong effect. \
On 26 November 2013 15:29, Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org wrote:
Hi Kevin,
I have updated the script you shared here:
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/PowerManagement/Doc/AdaptiveTickless?action=AttachFiledo=viewtarget=nohz-test-cpuset.sh
to get the time for which cpu wasn't
In case somebody needs..
Video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ABRtzVtUVBo
Presentation:
http://elinux.org/images/6/64/Elc2011_rostedt.pdf
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
Hi Kevin,
I have updated the script you shared here:
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/PowerManagement/Doc/AdaptiveTickless?action=AttachFiledo=viewtarget=nohz-test-cpuset.sh
to get the time for which cpu wasn't getting interrupted.
Probably this might be useful for few other folks as well
Hi Guys,
I was wondering if somebody has gone through an LDAP setup and has
this stuff working?
I found this page as well:
https://support.mozillamessaging.com/en-US/kb/thunderbird-and-gmail/discuss/771
but its not working. Actually I am not able to ping ldap.gmail.com and
so the problem..
On Wednesday 13 November 2013 09:45 PM, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
Totally OT, but why not
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-us/thunderbird/addon/google-contacts/
which is what some people I know use?
Don't know if that will work or not. We don't have linaro contacts in gmail
contacts
On 4 October 2013 18:09, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
bige...@linutronix.de wrote:
tglx, could you please take a look at this patch / thread?
Thomas, Ping!!
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
the total wall time or up time right and total idle
time from the beginning. It is not just during the sampling period
duration.
No.. load is calculated between samples... only
Thanks for your time.
/Ryan
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 4:02 AM, Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org
wrote:
On 27
On 26-Sep-2013 8:50 PM, Ryan ryanphilip...@googlemail.com wrote:
i did not quite understand the down differential part. Can any one
explain it.
What role it plays while scaling down. because if the load is less
than (upthresold - down_differential)
it scales down everytime the sample
On 26-Sep-2013 10:03 PM, Ryan ryanphilip...@googlemail.com wrote:
Can you explain a little bit, I read somewhere that it is due to ping
pong. but i was not able to visualize that part.
How it could happen.
Suppose load is changing between 90 and 99, then due to down diff we will
keep running
On 27-Sep-2013 1:55 AM, Ryan ryanphilip...@googlemail.com wrote:
Let me understand how the downscaling works in the older sources.
So, you mean that -
1) Upthreshold = 95%
down dif = 5%
so, upthreshold - down diff = 90%
if load is 85% ; cpu downscaling takes place
if load is 75% ;
On 24 July 2013 14:47, Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org wrote:
On 18 June 2013 10:21, Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org wrote:
Hi Thomas,
Do you still see some light of hope in this patch :) ?
Ping!!
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev
Hi Andrey,
linaro/configs/* is getting bigger and bigger, probably its the right time to
organize it better for the future. There can be multiple things that we can
do to avoid confusions of names but for now probably we can create
separate directories for boards, rootfs kernel fragments? Or
On 18 June 2013 10:21, Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org wrote:
On 31 May 2013 16:19, Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org wrote:
On 22 May 2013 14:04, Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org wrote:
Sorry for being late in replying to your queries.
On 13 May 2013 16:05, Thomas Gleixner t
Adding more relevant list in cc.
On 23 July 2013 16:05, Ryan ryanphilip...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have some doubts on backup and restore operation. From what i understand:
We copy all registers values addresses of all controllers in the SOC
to the internal RAM or SRAM.
before we put
Adding its author in cc.
On 27 June 2013 14:16, J nsyncm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi.
I have been trying to apply Linaro's HMP scheduler to a big.LITTLE
machine, which has 4 big and 4 LITTLE cores.
However, I could only utilize two cores with the HMP scheduler.
While hmp_select_faster_cpu()
On 20 June 2013 00:41, David Long dave.l...@linaro.org wrote:
This patch series adds basic uprobes support to ARM. It is based on patches
developed earlier by Rabin Vincent. That approach of adding special cases
into the kprobes instruction parsing code was not well received. This
On 17 June 2013 14:52, Manjunath Goudar manjunath.gou...@linaro.org wrote:
when we are using tab characters before do_wakeup and ret variable,we
will be getting error below.
WARNING: please, no space before tabs
#31: FILE: drivers/usb/host/ohci-at91.c:622:
+^Ibool ^I^Ido_wakeup =
On 22 May 2013 00:13, Andrey Konovalov andrey.konova...@linaro.org wrote:
Hi Viresh,
Merged into v3.10-rc2 based llct-20130521.0.
Hi Again.
I have rebased this over linaro-android-3.10-experimental from John.
Please repull it.
___
linaro-dev
On 31 May 2013 16:19, Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org wrote:
On 22 May 2013 14:04, Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org wrote:
Sorry for being late in replying to your queries.
On 13 May 2013 16:05, Thomas Gleixner t...@linutronix.de wrote:
Which mechanism is migrating the timer away
On 13 June 2013 14:41, Manjunath Goudar manjunath.gou...@linaro.org wrote:
Suspend scenario in case of ohci-spear glue was not
properly handled as it was not suspending generic part
of ohci controller.Calling explicitly the ohci_suspend()
Add space after full stop.
routine in
Please use linaro-kernel instead of linaro-dev mailing list for sending patches.
On 13 June 2013 14:46, Manjunath Goudar manjunath.gou...@linaro.org wrote:
Suspend scenario in case of ohci bus glue was not properly handled as
it was not suspending generic part of ohci controller. Calling
of enabling multi-platform kernels on ARM.
Signed-off-by: Manjunath Goudar manjunath.gou...@linaro.org
Cc: Viresh Kumar viresh.li...@gmail.com
Cc: Arnd Bergmann a...@arndb.de
Cc: Greg KH g...@kroah.com
Cc: Alan Stern st...@rowland.harvard.edu
Cc: linux-...@vger.kernel.org
---
drivers/usb/host
Hi Rafael,
The following changes since commit d683b96b072dc4680fc74964eca77e6a23d1fa6e:
Linux 3.10-rc4 (2013-06-02 17:11:17 +0900)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.linaro.org/people/vireshk/linux.git cpufreq-next
for you to fetch changes up to
On 7 June 2013 16:41, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
On Friday, June 07, 2013 04:26:36 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
cpufreq: bit.LITTLE needs cpufreq table
That should be big.LITTLE I suppose?
Yes. This is not the first time I face this issue where big is
written as bit. Even I named
Hi Rafael,
The following changes since commit d683b96b072dc4680fc74964eca77e6a23d1fa6e:
Linux 3.10-rc4 (2013-06-02 17:11:17 +0900)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.linaro.org/people/vireshk/linux.git cpufreq-next
for you to fetch changes up to
Hi Guys,
Few of my ARM colleagues are facing issues in obtaining git tree for
13.03 release.
They are referring:
https://releases.linaro.org/13.03/android/vexpress
file: linaro_kernel_build_cmds.sh
Which has got following line to go to checkout released tree.
git checkout
On 22 May 2013 14:04, Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org wrote:
Sorry for being late in replying to your queries.
On 13 May 2013 16:05, Thomas Gleixner t...@linutronix.de wrote:
Which mechanism is migrating the timer away?
It will be the same: get_nohz_timer_target() which will decide
)
{
for (;;) {
- wfi();
+ /* enter WFI mode */
+ cpu_do_idle();
if (pen_release == cpu) {
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev
On 27 May 2013 17:55, Manjunath Goudar manjunath.gou...@linaro.org wrote:
This series of patches begins the process of splitting ohci-hcd up into
a core library module and independent pci driver modules.
Patch 1/3 prepares the way by exporting a few functions from ohci-hcd
and adding a new
Sorry for being late in replying to your queries.
On 13 May 2013 16:05, Thomas Gleixner t...@linutronix.de wrote:
Which mechanism is migrating the timer away?
It will be the same: get_nohz_timer_target() which will decide target
cpu for migration.
I have no objections to the functionality per
On 22 May 2013 14:36, Peter Zijlstra pet...@infradead.org wrote:
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 02:04:16PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
So, this is the clean draft for the idea I had.. (Naming is poor for
now):
diff --git a/include/linux/timer.h b/include/linux/timer.h
index 8c5a197..ad00ebe 100644
Please write spear as SPEAr.
On 20 May 2013 12:03, Sanjay Singh Rawat sanjay.ra...@linaro.org wrote:
Generic arm cpu hotplug related functions are moved to core hotplug code,
remove the functions from the platform code.
Signed-off-by: Sanjay Singh Rawat sanjay.ra...@linaro.org
---
On 17 May 2013 22:17, John Stultz john.stu...@linaro.org wrote:
On 05/16/2013 09:18 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 16 May 2013 22:58, John Stultz john.stu...@linaro.org wrote:
Do you have a git branch with the queue you just sent Todd available? It
probably would be easiest to just merge
Hi Guys,
V3 [1] of latest upstream effort for big LITTLE Architecture is ready for
release. It is based of 3.10-rc1.
Updates:
---
- Stats: Total distinct patches: 28
- New branch: master-wq-migration-v5 (Queued for 3.11)
- New versions of branches:
On 20 May 2013 15:42, Amit Kucheria amit.kuche...@linaro.org wrote:
Do you also have a tree based on linux-linaro where the reference MP
patches are removed and this branch applied so Naresh and Vincent can
continue their benchmarking experiments? Or will we wait until Andrey
has finalised the
arch_get_fast_and_slow_cpus to get logical cpumask correctly
Thomas Gleixner (1):
genirq: Add default affinity mask command line option
Viresh Kumar (9):
workqueues: Introduce new flag WQ_POWER_EFFICIENT for power
oriented workqueues
workqueue: Add system wide power_efficient workqueues
On 17 May 2013 16:01, Liviu Dudau liviu.du...@arm.com wrote:
We are still waiting for some workload automation test results before we can
decide. Sorry I haven't replied yet to your other email, but we don't have
the bandwidth in ARM at the moment to run the tests, so it will fall into
your
On 16 May 2013 14:58, Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org wrote:
Hi Todd and others,
If we have a multi-package system, where we have multiple instances of struct
policy (per package), currently we can't have multiple instances of same
governor. i.e. We can't have multiple instances
On 16 May 2013 22:58, John Stultz john.stu...@linaro.org wrote:
Do you have a git branch with the queue you just sent Todd available? It
probably would be easiest to just merge that in.
Yes I do have it. It is android-experimental-3.9 based. Can we merge
that simply with linux-linaro or it is
You missed lists. in linaro-dev address.
On 16 May 2013 22:17, Chris Redpath chris.redp...@arm.com wrote:
Hi Viresh, this patch set contains 3 fixed for issues I've seen recently
in the HMP reference patch set. Please would you be able to take them
and make a new v17 branch :)
These are
Fixing linaro dev address
On 16 May 2013 22:18, Chris Redpath chris.redp...@arm.com wrote:
rq-nr_running is the actual number of runnable tasks we wish to use
to determine if a task is alone on a CPU.
Change-Id: Icaf3022e02924ecdc94e14d4146c6fadd9580e2b
Signed-off-by: Chris Redpath
Fixing Linaro dev addresss.
On 16 May 2013 22:18, Chris Redpath chris.redp...@arm.com wrote:
If the entity is not a task, it is a cfs group rq. Iterate up to
find the task entity.
Change-Id: I7cab7aba0798f6f14e38ad32e566d90e5937ffbc
Signed-off-by: Chris Redpath chris.redp...@arm.com
---
Fixing linaro dev address
On 16 May 2013 22:18, Chris Redpath chris.redp...@arm.com wrote:
Previously, an offline CPU would always appear to have a zero load
and this would distort the offload functionality used for balancing
big and little domains.
Maintain a mask of online CPUs in each
On 17 May 2013 09:48, Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org wrote:
On 16 May 2013 22:58, John Stultz john.stu...@linaro.org wrote:
Do you have a git branch with the queue you just sent Todd available? It
probably would be easiest to just merge that in.
Yes I do have it. It is android
On 26 April 2013 00:46, Andrey Konovalov andrey.konova...@linaro.org wrote:
Greetings,
I've been asked to have the list of the linux-linaro and
linux-linaro-core-tracking topic owners in git.l.o. I longer term this
information would be a part of the manifest. For now it would be a text file
On 9 April 2013 20:22, Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org wrote:
[Steven replied to a personal Ping!!, including everybody again]
On 9 April 2013 19:25, Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org wrote:
On Tue, 2013-04-09 at 14:05 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
Ping!!
Remind me again. What problem
On 19 November 2012 20:17, Punit Agrawal punit.agra...@arm.com wrote:
The patch was picked up as-is from the RT patches as it implements a
functionality that we wanted to better control IRQ affinity. Being part
of the RT patches, I hope that it'll merge into mainline via that route
and I am
[Steven replied to a personal Ping!!, including everybody again]
On 9 April 2013 19:25, Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org wrote:
On Tue, 2013-04-09 at 14:05 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
Ping!!
Remind me again. What problem are you trying to solve?
I was trying to migrate a running timer
On 5 April 2013 00:18, John Stultz john.stu...@linaro.org wrote:
Yea, I'll push it upstream and send it to Andrey for Linux Linaro. Thanks
for the testing.
There are more problems than this i believe...
Everytime i run merge_config.sh even with O=../ option, i have to run
make mrproper to
On 5 April 2013 07:58, John Stultz john.stu...@linaro.org wrote:
On 04/04/2013 06:34 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
Everytime i run merge_config.sh even with O=../ option, i have to run
O=../ ?
Hmm.. when we compile kernel we can give O=../output-folder as an
parameter and so image/binaries
Hi John,
I have been struggling since some time who creates source directory
in my kernel tree?
And i thought to clean up the mess today and found running
merge_config.sh creates
it.. And it isn't cleaned up even by running make mrproper...
PS: I am not using O=../ option.
Hi Guys,
[All this is not yet mainlined and is WIP]
Linaro and ARM are developing Linux solutions for big LITTLE Architecture. And
I maintain all the stable stuff on this here: [1] and this gets pulled
in by Andrey for
every linux-linaro release.
[1] by itself isn't much usable as it doesn't
On 3 April 2013 21:41, John Stultz john.stu...@linaro.org wrote:
On 04/02/2013 11:26 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
Hi John,
I have been struggling since some time who creates source directory
in my kernel tree?
And i thought to clean up the mess today and found running
merge_config.sh creates
On 3 April 2013 21:38, Young, Chad chad.yo...@amd.com wrote:
I am looking for the kernel source 3.5.0-rc7 for the ARM versatile express
system, does anyone know where I can find it?
Look for this tag: ll-20120712.0, here:
On 3 April 2013 22:53, John Stultz john.stu...@linaro.org wrote:
Huh. I'm totally unfamiliar with this.
Looks like when adding support for the -O option, if its not used, we end up
passing -O=. to make, which generates the unnecessary source softlink.
Does the attached patch fix it for you?
On 29 March 2013 20:19, zhoujie wu zhouji...@gmail.com wrote:
I have synced the governor_interactive.c from the latest linaro code branch
integration-android-vexpress that release at Feb.2013.
I never said i have changes in interactive governor as i can't push
that for 3.9.
It isn't mainlined
On 26 March 2013 22:52, Dietmar Eggemann dietmar.eggem...@arm.com wrote:
Would it be possible for you to merge in 'idlenocb.2013.03.18b' (based
on v3.9-rc2) (or newer) from
'git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulmck/linux-rcu.git'
into your big.LITTLE MP tree? I talked to Paul
On 27 November 2012 19:17, Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org wrote:
On Tue, 2012-11-06 at 16:08 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
diff --git a/kernel/timer.c b/kernel/timer.c
@@ -729,6 +730,12 @@ __mod_timer(struct timer_list *timer, unsigned long
expires,
base = lock_timer_base(timer
Hi Guys,
Below are hangout upstreams of Scheduler Internals by Vincent Guittot
done in LCA13.
We have got another version of this recording that is done by some
other cameras, but
its size was 30 GB and so hard to upstream. In case you need that
please contact me.
Day 1:
On 28 February 2013 09:42, Vikas Sajjan vikas.saj...@linaro.org wrote:
Add display-timing node parsing to drm fimd and depends on
the display helper patchset at
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2013-January/033998.html
It also adds pinctrl support for drm fimd.
Hi Vikas,
Can
On 18 February 2013 23:50, Serge Broslavsky serge.broslav...@linaro.org wrote:
On 18.02.13 12:20 -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
For the record, I think what Peter is suggesting is reasonable. There
must be better ways for people to find out what Linaro is participating in
other than scaring them
On 21 February 2013 16:34, Amit Kucheria amit.kuche...@linaro.org wrote:
I don't have a strong preference one way or another about switching
from linaro-dev to linaro-kernel.
Don't forget to update
https://wiki.linaro.org/Resources/HowTo/Git/GitSendEmail
Done.
On 22 February 2013 05:05, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
On Monday, February 11, 2013 01:20:00 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
This patch is inclined towards providing this infrastructure. Because we are
required to allocate governor's resources dynamically now, we must do it at
policy
On 22 February 2013 05:23, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
On Monday, February 11, 2013 01:20:02 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
+config CPU_FREQ_HAVE_MULTIPLE_POLICIES
+ bool
+
So I suppose some architectures will select this, right?
Yes. And they have to enable have_multiple_policies
On 22 February 2013 05:15, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
Why did you change all of the lines of this macro instead of changing just the
one line you needed to change?
I didn't like the indentation used within the macro. So did it.
Please don't do that.
Okay.
On 22 February 2013 07:51, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
On Friday, February 22, 2013 07:38:12 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
No. These are used atleast for ondemand conservative.
They will be after the next patch, you mean? :-)
Well, it appeared so from the next patch ...
Yes
On 11 February 2013 13:20, Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org wrote:
diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
#define CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE (0)
@@ -183,11 +197,10 @@ static inline unsigned long cpufreq_scale(unsigned long
old, u_int div, u_int mu
#define
On 22 February 2013 08:03, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
On Friday, February 22, 2013 07:47:44 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 22 February 2013 05:15, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
Why did you change all of the lines of this macro instead of changing just
the
one line you needed
On 22 February 2013 07:59, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
On Friday, February 22, 2013 07:44:23 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
If you don't like this one then we can add another entry
into struct policy like: gov_sysfs_parent.
I don't know. This is going to look kind of ugly this way
On 11 February 2013 13:19, Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org wrote:
This is targetted for 3.10-rc1 or linux-next just after the merge window.
Hi Rafael,
I have pushed this patch again with the modifications/fixups i posted:
cpufreq-for-3.10
Also i have swapped patch 3 4, in case you decide
On 20 February 2013 14:06, Philip Colmer philip.col...@linaro.org wrote:
I'm not entirely comfortable with blindly white-listing anyone who posts to
linaro-dev with something that doesn't look like spam, for several reasons:
1. That is not a great way to run a moderated mailing list.
2. IT
On 20 February 2013 16:19, Wookey woo...@wookware.org wrote:
+++ Philip Colmer [2013-02-20 08:36 +]:
I'm not entirely comfortable with blindly white-listing anyone who posts
to linaro-dev with something that doesn't look like spam, for several
reasons:
1. That is not a great
Hi Guys,
I really don't know whom to direct this mail to and hence the wide spread.
Problem: When we send a mail to kernel mailing lists with linaro-dev
or linaro-kernel
in cc, and we get replies to those mails, sometimes the mails from
outside people
doesn't reach us back on linaro mailing
On 20 February 2013 11:00, Amit Kucheria amit.kuche...@linaro.org wrote:
Yes, the moderator lets these emails in and whitelists known upstream
developers upon request. Please let Anmar or Philip know any such
email addresses.
Okay. I got this.
But what i requested was a bit more than that...
Applied here:
http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=arm/big.LITTLE/mp.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/power-aware-scheduling-v5
On 18 February 2013 10:37, Alex Shi alex@intel.com wrote:
Since the simplification of fork/exec/wake balancing has much arguments,
I removed that part in the patch set.
On 17 February 2013 03:13, Andrey Konovalov andrey.konova...@linaro.org wrote:
Merged into llct-20130217.0
Hi Andrey,
Because 3.8 is released today, do you want this release to be based of
that instead of an RC release? It wouldn't be much work for everybody
i believe.
On 17 February 2013 11:11, Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org wrote:
I have booked a room from 11:00 AM to 12:00 PM : 1 hr.
I will see if i can request it from 10:30 to 11:00 also, in case the other
party
accepts it :)
I would request all of us to reach ARM by 10:30 AM. So, that we
cpumask correctly
Thomas Gleixner (1):
genirq: Add default affinity mask command line option
Viresh Kumar (7):
configs: Add config fragments for big LITTLE MP
linaro/configs: Update big LITTLE MP fragment for task placement work
config-frag/big-LITTLE: Use device-tree
On 11 February 2013 02:44, Francesco Lavra francescolavra...@gmail.com wrote:
dbs_data-tuners is never freed, which means there is a memory leak
across CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_INIT and CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT events.
The same goes for the ondemand governor.
Thanks for pointing out. Would be fixed
On 11 February 2013 09:46, Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org wrote:
On 11 February 2013 02:44, Francesco Lavra francescolavra...@gmail.com
wrote:
dbs_data-tuners is never freed, which means there is a memory leak
across CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_INIT and CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT events.
The same
On 8 February 2013 23:35, Vincent Guittot vincent.guit...@linaro.org wrote:
The nr_busy_cpus field of the sched_group_power is sometime different from 0
whereas the platform is fully idle. This serie fixes 3 use cases:
- when some CPUs enter idle state while booting all CPUs
- when a CPU is
have_multiple_policies is required by platforms having multiple clock-domains
for cpus, i.e. supporting multiple policies for cpus. This patch adds in a
Kconfig option for enabling execution of this code.
Reported-by: Borislav Petkov b...@alien8.de
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.ku
your opinion on the same.
Viresh Kumar (4):
cpufreq: Add per policy governor-init/exit infrastructure
cpufreq: governor: Implement per policy instances of governors
cpufreq: Add Kconfig option to enable/disable have_multiple_policies
cpufreq: Get rid of struct global_attr
drivers/cpufreq
, but with different tunables.
This patch is inclined towards providing this infrastructure. Because we are
required to allocate governor's resources dynamically now, we must do it at
policy creation and end. And so got CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_INIT/EXIT.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org
We don't need to keep two structures for file attributes, global_attr and
freq_attr. Lets use freq_attr only for cpufreq core and drivers.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org
---
drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c | 9 -
drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 30
1 - 100 of 422 matches
Mail list logo