Great feedback Kiko! Update the post.
On 16 September 2011 10:10, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 05:02:24PM -0500, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
>> http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/2011/09/15/switching-out-a-pre-built-android-images-kernel/
>
> Nice. To guide th
On 16 September 2011 10:55, Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Just my 2 cents.
>
> On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 16:13:32 -0500
> Zach Pfeffer wrote:
>
>> On 15 September 2011 15:58, James Westby
>> wrote:
>> > On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 15:08:26 -0500, Zach Pfef
On 16 September 2011 10:39, James Westby wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 10:19:49 -0500, Zach Pfeffer
> wrote:
>> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/linaro-android/+spec/linaro-android-gen-script-to-download-and-prog-builds
>>
>> For making downloading a programming builds e
On 16 September 2011 08:53, James Westby wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 16:13:32 -0500, Zach Pfeffer
> wrote:
>> It just does it by name.
>>
>> Thinking more about this.
>>
>> Replacing a kernel is a pretty normal operation. I think if we just
>> gene
I get these questions a lot so I wrote some blog posts with the exact
steps I used.
http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/2011/09/15/switching-out-a-pre-built-android-images-kernel/
http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/2011/09/15/%EF%BB%BFbuilding-a-linaro-android-build-from-source/
Enjoy!
--
Zach
On 15 September 2011 15:58, James Westby wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 15:08:26 -0500, Zach Pfeffer
> wrote:
>> I'm writing up some notes on building Android from scratch and
>> replacing the kernel in an Android build from one built locally, and I
>> realized
what gets used - which would make finding
this information easier since if would one of the configs that gets
passed to the build like TARGET_PRODUCT. Thoughts?
--
Zach Pfeffer
Android Platform Team Lead, Linaro Platform Teams
Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Li
y". ]
I agree. I really don't like to use the terms bad or ugly to describe
work. I think it sets the wrong tone.
It sounds like staging is generally okay with people. I tend to take
the view that its always possible to upstream the outstanding patches,
though it may not be likely - th
ist
> linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
> http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
>
--
Zach Pfeffer
Android Platform Team Lead, Linaro Platform Teams
Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro
http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg - http:
On 12 September 2011 16:36, Michael Hope wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 11:36 PM, Loïc Minier wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 12, 2011, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
>>> I think stage is okay. Its short for staging which is used in the
>>> kernel as a place for things which aren'
On 12 September 2011 06:36, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2011, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
>> I think stage is okay. Its short for staging which is used in the
>> kernel as a place for things which aren't mainline.
>> If I hear of any other issues with the name I'l
On 12 September 2011 06:00, Alexander Sack wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 7:34 PM, Christian Robottom Reis
> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 12:09:55PM -0500, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
>> > The term "Stage" is used to indicate builds that contain patc
Linaro has been hard at work getting the first 11.09 candidate builds
out. All instructions, test results and tips are listed at each link.
Of note:
Replaced jpeg lib with libjpeg-turbo
Linux version 3.0.3
gcc version 4.6.2 20110813 (prerelease)
Compiled with -O3
Panda
https://android-build.lina
Thought people may find this information interesting.
I was going through all the changes that came in for each target as I
was cutting the first candidate builds of the 11.09 release. The From
is 11.08 and the To: is our release point: Here's each kernel:
The upstream build (works for Panda, Bea
Linaro's tip Panda, Beagle, Beagle xM, Snowball and iMX53 builds
working again. I will release 11.09 versions of these soon.
Panda-LEB and Origen are not coming up. We're investigating.
These are working:
Beagle, Beagle xM
https://android-build.linaro.org/builds/~linaro-android/beagle/#build=255
On 6 September 2011 00:28, Fathi Boudra wrote:
> On 6 September 2011 00:15, Alexander Sack wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 10:37 PM, Paul Sokolovsky
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, 5 Sep 2011 14:36:48 +0300
>>> Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
>>>
>>> Ok, patched repo is available as:
>>>
>>> http://android.g
On 30 August 2011 10:50, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:46:55AM -0500, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
>> Because we push everything upstream.
>
> While I agree with that blanket statement, there's no reason we wouldn't
> provide a [potentially tem
On 2 September 2011 12:39, Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
> On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 18:21:30 -0400
> James Westby wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 1 Sep 2011 17:10:03 -0500, Zach Pfeffer
>> wrote:
>> > We've had two instances of this problem for all the builds we've
>>
t / interesting in its image / shared library loader(s)?
> Dave
>
> On 30 Aug 2011, at 17:24, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
>
>> Steve,
>>
>> I'd like you to meet Jim who did the initial hardfloat work. This
>> email contains the results that Jim produced.
>>
to create libs that can run on as many
architectures as possible.
-Zach
-- Forwarded message --
From: Jim Huang
Date: 7 August 2011 18:01
Subject: Re: Would you send me your hard float experiment results you
presented in Budapest?
To: Zach Pfeffer
2011/8/7 Zach Pfeffer :
> Ji
On 1 September 2011 17:21, James Westby wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Sep 2011 17:10:03 -0500, Zach Pfeffer
> wrote:
>> We've had two instances of this problem for all the builds we've ever
>> done. One instance was trying to sync u-boot and the other was trying
>> to
On 1 September 2011 17:04, James Westby wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Sep 2011 16:51:25 -0500, Zach Pfeffer
> wrote:
>> Anyhow, we have a few ways to solve this issue. I would say that as
>> long as we reference trees whose shas are reachable from the branches
>> in the remote git
On 1 September 2011 05:59, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:13:08AM -0500, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
>> > Any other issues that I've missed? Where should we come down in this case?
>>
>> I say we stay the course and fix the issue of sha'
On 31 August 2011 08:06, James Westby wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 22:38:22 -0500, Zach Pfeffer
> wrote:
>> > It sounds like you are advocating using a model where we use tags to
>> > ensure that the referenced revisions are reachable from a head, and then
>>
On 30 August 2011 19:48, Alexander Sack wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 2:09 AM, James Westby
> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 11:10:10 -0500, Zach Pfeffer
>> wrote:
>> > There's no reason to do it now, because its solving the wrong problem.
>> &g
On 30 August 2011 19:09, James Westby wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 11:10:10 -0500, Zach Pfeffer
> wrote:
>> There's no reason to do it now, because its solving the wrong problem.
>> The problem is sha's disappear. We use sha's because the provide
>> immova
On 30 August 2011 13:56, Andy Green wrote:
> On 08/31/2011 12:58 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
>>
>> On 29 August 2011 21:14, Andy Green wrote:
>>>
>>> On 08/30/2011 03:24 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
Andy Doan had the observation:
> I hit a p
On 29 August 2011 21:14, Andy Green wrote:
> On 08/30/2011 03:24 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
>>
>> Andy Doan had the observation:
>>
>>> I hit a problem similar to this last year and discovered that something
>>> is a bit broken in make 3.81 related to this. We reverted to make
I just wanted to make everyone aware of the fantastic job that the
infrastructure team and the validation team are doing to ensure that
our builds are extremely easy to use.
With the inclusion of test results on the build page:
https://android-build.linaro.org/builds/~linaro-android/panda/
We ca
On 30 August 2011 10:58, James Westby wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 12:50:51 -0300, Christian Robottom Reis
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:46:55AM -0500, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
>> > Because we push everything upstream.
>>
>> While I agree with that blanke
On 30 August 2011 10:50, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:46:55AM -0500, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
>> Because we push everything upstream.
>
> While I agree with that blanket statement, there's no reason we wouldn't
> provide a [potentially tem
Because we push everything upstream.
On 30 August 2011 10:43, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 01:25:15PM +0300, Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
>> Yeah, I have patch for that. But we cannot use before upstream accepts
>> it (because people will get errors checking out tree) and I
On 30 August 2011 05:46, Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 18:42:29 +0200
> Alexander Sack wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 3:22 PM, Paul Sokolovsky
>> > > wrote:
>>
>> > It's not enough if you still want to refer to it via SHA, due to
>> > repo peculiarities. It should be also reac
Nipuna from TI mentioned that the Linaro Android vs Regular Android
demo is posted at http://www.pandaboard.org/. Hopefully we'll be able
to create an even better demo that shows how awesome the work we do
here is!
-Zach
___
linaro-dev mailing list
lina
tried
to get the dependencies worked out.
On 29 August 2011 13:57, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
> The last 2 things to do are to fix the build system so that when you
> build concurrently the modules get into the system.tar.bz2.
>
> Things should get installed to:
>
> out/target/produc
The last 2 things to do are to fix the build system so that when you
build concurrently the modules get into the system.tar.bz2.
Things should get installed to:
out/target/product/pandaboard/system/modules
...and they do when you build without -j
The file:
device/linaro/common/tasks/kernel.mk
On 29 August 2011 10:58, Andy Green wrote:
> On 08/29/2011 11:41 PM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
>>
>> On 29 August 2011 10:13, Andy Green wrote:
>>>
>>> On 08/29/2011 09:22 PM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
>>>
It's not enough if you still want to refer to it via
On 29 August 2011 10:13, Andy Green wrote:
> On 08/29/2011 09:22 PM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
>
>> It's not enough if you still want to refer to it via SHA, due to repo
>> peculiarities. It should be also reachable from one of the live
>> branches (so, instead of a tag, a branch
Jagan,
That's awesome. Looping in linaro-dev and David Brown who's the MSM
maintainer.
On 29 August 2011 10:09, jagan <402ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> I am working as kernel bsp developer in android-2.3 for Qualcomm QSD8X50
> target.
> Currently I am porting linux-3.0 on qsd8250_surf.
> I am a
stomization of the craneboard. So that I may attempt to create patches for
> the craneboard.
>
> -Tim
>
> On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 7:18 PM, Zach Pfeffer
> wrote:
>>
>> Timothy,
>>
>> You had asked me about RT Android. I need to look into it a little.
>
On 29 August 2011 08:22, Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 08:08:17 -0500
> Zach Pfeffer wrote:
>
>> Now that we have an Android build for every board and Gerrit and LAVA
>> I'd like to unify how we handle kernels for each so that we can work
>> more
Now that we have an Android build for every board and Gerrit and LAVA
I'd like to unify how we handle kernels for each so that we can work
more efficiently, start to unify the kernels and provide a means for
external Android users to start to improve these trees.
First, since we control the kernel
To make the Panda LEB build from scratch do:
mkdir leb-panda
cd leb-panda
export MANIFEST_REPO=git://android.git.linaro.org/platform/manifest.git
export MANIFEST_BRANCH=linaro_android_2.3.5
export MANIFEST_FILENAME=LEB-panda.xml
export TARGET_PRODUCT=pandaboard
export TARGET_SIMULATOR=false
export
On 26 August 2011 13:02, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
> ...
>> Since the kernel is running the framebuffer I would start to look there.
>>
>> Yves,
>>
>> Do you have a PoC for the framebuffer driver owner at Fre
On 26 August 2011 20:06, Eric Miao wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 1:38 AM, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
>> On 26 August 2011 09:35, Eric Miao wrote:
>>> Hi Zach,
>>>
>>> We are really a bit short of resource at this moment. We'll definitely look
>>>
John,
I'm having some trouble booting Panda with our MLO that gets compiled
from source. We've got a bug:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linaro-android/+bug/833832
Which details the current state of things.
-Zach
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@li
Team (and others),
Now that we have images for all boards (2 images for Panda) it should
allow us to really start cranking. I recently reviewed the
capabilities of each board and would like to focus on enabling the
connectivity options for each. In order of importance we should make
sure these wor
Cool. Thanks for the input everyone.
On 26 August 2011 07:17, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 01:59:55PM +0200, Alexander Sack wrote:
>> > I don't think we should shut down the #linaro-android because it's an open
>> > channel rather than the private mailing list "linaro-
On 26 August 2011 00:04, Andy Green wrote:
> On 08/26/2011 12:12 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
>
>>> 1. Set up branch policy (naming, etc.) and enforce it on Gerrit level.
>>> This may require revamping branching in other toolchain/* components
>>> (upstreamed not from AOSP), but
nd I'm really sorry to have some delay here.
>
> - eric
>
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
>> The biggest priority is the display bug:
>>
>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/linaro-android/+bug/824506
>>
>> Where are you guys on fixing this?
&
It looks like just sending things to linaro-dev will be the easiest
and most transparent. Hopefully this will be one less thing to worry
about. I'll keep the alias around for a bit.
Now the question is should we shut down #linaro-android? Ideas?
-Zach
On 23 August 2011 07:46, Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Some time passed since last update on Gerrit deployment, that's
> because work on complete AOSP mirroring to out tree took longer than
> expected. All in all, following was done:
>
> Revamped branching in our toolchain/* components, free
On 25 August 2011 14:53, Tom Gall wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Christian Robottom Reis
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 04:15:37PM -0300, Ricardo Salveti wrote:
>>> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Zach Pfeffer
>>> wrote:
>>> > One thi
Adding linaro-dev.
On 25 August 2011 14:04, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
> One thing to keep in mind is that developers will get these tools from
> Google during their SDK install. Are we going to wrap that install?
>
> On 25 August 2011 13:12, Tom Gall wrote:
>> Hi Zach, Android W
Highlights
https://wiki.linaro.org/Cycles/1108/Release/Highlights
Upstream Build
https://android-build.linaro.org/builds/~linaro-android/panda-11.08-release/#build=4
Staging Builds
https://android-build.linaro.org/builds/~linaro-android/leb-origen-11.08-release/#build=5
https://android-build.l
Please contact Frans for anything general. For release related issues
over these 3 days we have the following people on call:
Shifts are UTC 00-08, 08-16, 16-24
22nd: 1st: 2nd: 3rd:
23rd: 1st: 2nd: 3rd:
24th: 1st: 2nd: 3rd:
-Zach
___
linaro-d
https://talkgadget.google.com/hangouts/cc2b83c2f98313a1544295457d191b6fb5fd054a?hl=en-US&authuser=0#
Here's the hangout
On 19 August 2011 13:51, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
> If you're around its in Plaza C. Feel free to IRC during the meeting
> in #linaro-android on Freenode.
Thanks Bero. Sending this extremely useful information out to a wider audience.
Alex,
I think you're probably be very interested in this for your Mozilla work.
>> -O3
>> * What is is, does, available on
>
> -O3 enables several additional compiler optimizations such as tree
> vectorizing a
On 19 August 2011 09:36, Botao Sun wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> Currently, we have 2 different situations according to our 2 different tool
> chains - old and new.
>
> For the old tool chain, use branch linaro_android_2.3.4 of my git
> repository: git://git.linaro.org/people/botaosun/busybox.git. This is
On 17 August 2011 06:05, Bernhard Rosenkranzer
wrote:
> On 17/08/2011, Chao Yang wrote:
>> Hi Bernhard,
>>
>> Well, I personally think so. Are we supposed to stop supporting 2.3.4 after
>> we release 2.3.5 and move all the activities to 2.3.5? Thanks.
>
> I think so - I think the idea is to alway
Sure. I didn't list it because Android doesn't really support generic
USB (it will in Ice Cream Sandwich through a new USB device layer)
Alexander,
Would you add:
* USB
* Keyboard
* Mouse
On 17 August 2011 01:46, David Gilbert wrote:
> On 16 August 2011 23:09, Zach P
Here's the general info I got from the Linux Foundation:
Can't make it to Vancouver this week for LinuxCon, the leading
technical conference for All Matters Linux? You can still take
advantage of the amazing content this event has to offer.
Live video streaming will be available for all of our ke
On 17 August 2011 04:12, Dave Martin wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 7:14 PM, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
>> Nicolas,
>>
>> Thanks for the notes. As you say there are many, many things that can
>> affect this demo. What notes like this really underscore is the
>> impor
ement
* Suspend and resume
* Wakelock
* Apps
* Can install apps
* Browser
* Calculator
* Calendar
* Camera
* Clock
* Contacts
* Email
* Gallery
* Messaging
* Phone
-Zach
On 16 August 2011 17:03, Alexander Sack wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 8:10 PM, Zach
To try out a build on Panda do:
wget --no-check-certificate
https://android-build.linaro.org/jenkins/job/linaro-android_leb-panda-11.08-release/1/artifact/build/out/target/product/pandaboard/boot.tar.bz2
wget --no-check-certificate
https://android-build.linaro.org/jenkins/job/linaro-android_leb-pa
benchmark numbers at:
https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/Android/AndroidToolchainBenchmarking
-Zach
On 13 August 2011 06:07, Dechesne, Nicolas wrote:
> Zach,
>
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 12:56 AM, Zach Pfeffer
> wrote:
>>
>> The demo consisted of two identical PandaBoards wi
On 15 August 2011 03:19, Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
> Hello Zach,
>
> On Sun, 14 Aug 2011 10:10:57 -0500
> Zach Pfeffer wrote:
>
>> Paul,
>>
>> I'd like to just save all toolchain builds from here on. Copying
>> builds to "good locations" just wa
I've used the following commands to create an Ubuntu build if it helps:
wget
http://snapshots.linaro.org/11.05-daily/linaro-ubuntu-desktop/20110728/1/images/tar/linaro-n-ubuntu-desktop-tar-20110728-1.tar.gz
wget
http://snapshots.linaro.org/11.05-daily/linaro-hwpacks/lt-panda/20110728/0/images/h
All,
While I'm at LinuxCon the 17th-19th and on a mini-break the 22nd-24th
please bring any urgent issues up with Frans Gifford.
For the release,
Our RC builds for Panda, Panda-Stage, Beagle, Snowball-Stage,
Origen-Stage and iMX53-Stage will be out by the 22nd at 16:00 UTC and
a final build will
Paul,
I'd like to just save all toolchain builds from here on. Copying
builds to "good locations" just wastes time since we have to redo the
builds. Will it be possible to save these and the release builds?
-Zach
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@
Chao,
Put this info and patches into a bug please so we can track it.
-Zach
On 12 August 2011 15:09, Chao Yang wrote:
> Hi Tom,
> As communicated before, I've committed the libjpeg-turbo to
> linaro-android-2.3.4. The wallpaper display problem is fixed by the patch
> enclosed.
> However, there
On 12 August 2011 10:08, Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 18:05:29 +0300
> Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 09:01:14 -0500
>> Zach Pfeffer wrote:
>>
>> > Oh, the other thing is to generate the pinned-manifest.xml before
>> &
Oh, the other thing is to generate the pinned-manifest.xml before the
build is made so that the build comes from the pinned-manifest.
This'll save us a step.
On 11 August 2011 22:26, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
> Paul,
>
> I was wondering if we could make a small change to android-b
Paul,
I was wondering if we could make a small change to android-build. I
just recently tested:
https://android-build.linaro.org/builds/~linaro-android/leb-panda/#build=166
It works great and I'd like to move it to a first 11.08 release. Its
based on toolchain:
https://android-build.linaro.org/
This looks really great Paul. Thanks!
Time to start pushing changes...
On 10 August 2011 12:48, Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Aug 2011 20:31:11 +0300
> Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
>
>> [originally sent from wrong email, so not sure if got thru]
>>
> []
>> The official Linaro builds at https://
On 10 August 2011 14:44, Michael Hope wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 2:29 AM, Bernhard Rosenkranzer
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> while working on some improvements, I noticed that our Android
>> toolchain binaries are built as 32-bit x86.
>> Is there any reason for this (other than "we inherited it from
Ramin,
Thanks for the email. I've added linaro-dev to my response.
The demo consisted of two identical PandaBoards with identical SD
cards running the 3D benchmark of 0xbench using software 3D to amplify
compiler and kernel improvements. 0xbench is a benchmarking program we
ship with our Android
ne fix this or should I just use master and revert later?
>
> I've attached the relevant file if anyone wants to push it (it gets
> back to 11.07 by simply specifying the correct revisions to pull -- no
> need to revert the other repositories).
>
> ttyl
> bero
>
>
Bero,
I think this might be a good patch to get up to AOSP after we try it
out. Assigning a bug for Chao to look at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linaro-android/+bug/822113
-Zach
On 2 August 2011 22:09, Bernhard Rosenkranzer
wrote:
> Hi,
> I just spotted this bit in Android's Makefiles (inherite
I have expanded and clarified the Android Plugfest page. I've also
listed a notes section for each session. Please take a look and send
me any questions you may have.
https://wiki.linaro.org/Events/LinaroConnectQ3.11/AndroidPlugfest/Agenda
I'm looking forward to working with everyone.
-Zach
___
All,
Arwen set up a private page for room numbers:
https://wiki.linaro.org/Internal/Events/LinaroConnectQ3.11/RoomNumbers
...if people want to share where they're at.
-Zach
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.o
Yeah...its Tuesday. Thanks for the clarification everyone and sorry
for the confusion.
-Zach
On 27 July 2011 15:18, Andy Green wrote:
> On 07/27/2011 08:41 PM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
>>
>> On Wed, 2011-07-27 at 14:33 -0500, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
>>>
>
Landing teams and other interested parties,
John Stultz will be in the Android hacking room from 11:00-13:00
(possibly earlier for working with Andy) on Monday. He'd like to meet
the other LTs as well. Everyone's who's interested is invited. We can
talk about the single kernel stuff and maybe get
This is so cool.
Thanks to the hard work of the Mathieu, Lee, Frans and others we'll be
able to release Snowball running Android to the launcher. Congrats
guys! A formal release announcement will come out soon.
See:
https://android-build.linaro.org/builds/~linaro-android/leb-snowball-11.07-relea
Until https://bugs.launchpad.net/linaro-image-tools/+bug/816010 gets fixed.
Its the last one that worked.
Use bzr up -r383 to check it out.
Issue is on 384, 385, 386
-Zach
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.or
On 21 July 2011 16:05, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
> All builds also ship with a MM framework. Take a look at:
> https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/Android/MultimediaTest
>
> You'll need the SDK to build the source.
>
>
> PandaBoard Linaro E
All builds also ship with a MM framework. Take a look at:
https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/Android/MultimediaTest
You'll need the SDK to build the source.
PandaBoard Linaro Evaluation Build RC Preview
--
Linux-3.0.0-rc7+, Linaro
Team,
George and Stephen have requested a side-by-side Panda demo by August
8th that can be loaded onto 2 SD cards and runs automatically when the
Panda boards boot up and features the great work that Linaro has done.
Some ideas (thanks to John for a lot of these):
Power saving measurements
libj
On 12 July 2011 13:34, Paul Larson wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Zach Pfeffer
> wrote:
>>
>> > This one is complete, results can be easily found at the usual place
>> > based
>> > on the
>> >
>> > url: http://validation
> lock(psPVRSRVMutexpsPVRSRVMutex);
> );
> lock([9.149963]
> lock(psPVRSRVMutexpsPVRSRVMutex);
> );
>
> *** DEADLOCK
> ***
>
> [
> 9.159881]
> [9.159881] *** DEADLOCK
> ***
> [
> 9.159881]
> May be due to missing lock nesting notation
>
Fellow PandaBoard enthusiasts, take our latest 3.0 kernel based,
Linaro GCC 4.5 upstream and enablement preview builds for a ride...
Upstream Focused Build:
After plugging in an SD card (listed here as /dev/sdc) run the
following commands:
wget --no-check-certificate
https://android-build.linaro
ndroid/+bug/812100
iMX53
~linaro-android/leb-imx53-11.07-release
Snowball
~linaro-android/leb-snowball-11.07-release
-Zach
On 17 July 2011 17:48, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
> Right now you'd just
>
> git clone git://git.linaro.org/android/platform/manifests.git
> cd manifests
> git che
Working on it...
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
In my excitement I forgot to include a link to the build. Here it is:
https://android-build.linaro.org/builds/~linaro-android/leb-snowball/
On 13 July 2011 21:17, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
> I have some exciting news.
>
> We have our first working Android Snowball build! By taking AOSP 2.
I have some exciting news.
We have our first working Android Snowball build! By taking AOSP 2.3.3
and adding a new board config based on Panda support the STE landing
team with help from the Android platform team and our valued partners
at STE were able to pull together a non-accelerated LEB for S
Original at https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/Android/Meetings/2011-07-13
=== Highlights ===
* Supported unaccelerated Snowball Android bringup and got the first
leb-snowball build going in https://android-build.linaro.org/
* Drove android-build to LAVA integration
* Onboarded Chao Yang, Tony Ma
an help it, and we want to follow Google's
processes as much as we can.
-Zach
On 12 July 2011 02:07, Ricardo Salveti wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 6:18 PM, Alexander Sack wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 4:11 PM, Zach Pfeffer
>> wrote:
>>> In-order to ma
All,
Just a quick reminder. If you're trying to get anything delivered into
an Android target for 11.07 you should have talked to me and we should
have an integration BP tracking it. You should also be testing your
stuff against the Android target you want to deliver on. Simply
getting source into
On 4 July 2011 12:29, Paul Larson wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 9:13 PM, Zach Pfeffer
> wrote:
>>
>> Yeah. Those results seem rational. Would you test:
>>
>>
>> https://android-build.linaro.org/builds/~linaro-android/panda-11.06-release/#build=3
>
2011 16:18, Alexander Sack wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 4:11 PM, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
>> In-order to make reproducible builds we create pinned manifests with
>> each commit explicitly listed. We also use this method to create a
>> release. We depend on these pinned commits - if th
201 - 300 of 380 matches
Mail list logo
