Binary build release process

2012-04-02 Thread Michael Hope
As part of closing out the Windows toolchain card, I've documented the binary build release process at: https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/ToolChain/BinaryBuild/ReleaseProcess The interesting thing is a script that pulls builds from S3 and posts them to Launchpad. There's a curl command at th

Re: [Linaro-toolchain-builds] [cbuild] eglibc-2.16~svn17843 armv7l completed

2012-04-02 Thread Michael Hope
On 2 April 2012 08:18, Michael Hope wrote: > On 1 April 2012 05:56, Ramana Radhakrishnan > wrote: >> I find it a bit worrying that all the nptl tests are failing with a >> common error message >> >>  http://builds.linaro.org/toolchain/eglibc-2.16~svn17843 >> >> Aborted' >> make[6]: *** >> [/scra

Re: GCC 4.7 runtime library plans

2012-04-02 Thread Michael Hope
On 2 April 2012 20:14, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 02.04.2012 03:49, Michael Hope wrote: >> >> On 23 March 2012 16:23, Michael Hope  wrote: >>> >>> On 16 March 2012 14:54, Michael Hope  wrote: Hi Ricardo, Matthias.  GCC 4.7 is almost here and it's likely that Linaro GCC 4.7 will come

Re: Armhf dynamic linker path

2012-04-02 Thread dann frazier
On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 07:56:16PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 17:15, Matthias Klose wrote: > > On 02.04.2012 21:46, Jon Masters wrote: > >> On 04/02/2012 03:04 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > >>> On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 09:19, Riku Voipio  wrote: > On 31 March 2012 19:52,

Re: Armhf dynamic linker path

2012-04-02 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 17:15, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 02.04.2012 21:46, Jon Masters wrote: >> On 04/02/2012 03:04 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: >>> On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 09:19, Riku Voipio  wrote: On 31 March 2012 19:52, Dennis Gilmore  wrote: > Linaro Connect and other events are probably

[ACTIVITY] March 26 - March 30

2012-04-02 Thread Thiago Jung Bauermann
Hi, GDB for Android: * Submitted upstream three patches for building gdbserver on Android. Reworked two of them based on review comments, and committed one. * Investigated ARM EABI build attributes and .note.ABI-tag as ways of marking binaries as Android apps so that GDB can differentiate t

Re: Armhf dynamic linker path

2012-04-02 Thread Matthias Klose
On 02.04.2012 21:46, Jon Masters wrote: On 04/02/2012 03:04 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 09:19, Riku Voipio wrote: On 31 March 2012 19:52, Dennis Gilmore wrote: Linaro Connect and other events are probably the worst place for such decisions and discussions to be made. tho

Re: Armhf dynamic linker path

2012-04-02 Thread Jon Masters
On 04/02/2012 03:04 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 09:19, Riku Voipio wrote: >> On 31 March 2012 19:52, Dennis Gilmore wrote: >>> Linaro Connect and other events are probably the worst place for such >>> decisions and discussions to be made. though maybe there is not a good >>

Re: Armhf dynamic linker path

2012-04-02 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 09:19, Riku Voipio wrote: > On 31 March 2012 19:52, Dennis Gilmore wrote: >> Linaro Connect and other events are probably the worst place for such >> decisions and discussions to be made. though maybe there is not a good >> place. the wider community needs to be engaged for

Re: Armhf dynamic linker path

2012-04-02 Thread dann frazier
On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 03:04:11PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 09:19, Riku Voipio wrote: > > On 31 March 2012 19:52, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > >> Linaro Connect and other events are probably the worst place for such > >> decisions and discussions to be made. though maybe t

Re: Armhf dynamic linker path

2012-04-02 Thread Riku Voipio
Hi Dennis, On 31 March 2012 19:52, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > Linaro Connect and other events are probably the worst place for such > decisions and discussions to be made. though maybe there is not a good > place. the wider community needs to be engaged for greatest acceptance. > otherwise then if f

Re: How to do a manual bzr merge when "bzr merge" fails

2012-04-02 Thread Ramana Radhakrishnan
> > Anyway, I doubt there's anybody else needs to know this: I've just posted it > in case I get hit by a bus before next month. It's probably something that should be documented and linked from BzrTips or a "how to do an upstream merge" in the toolchain wiki (if we had something like that ) ? >

How to do a manual bzr merge when "bzr merge" fails

2012-04-02 Thread Andrew Stubbs
Hi all, Right now, it's impossible to merge from lp:gcc/4.7 to lp:gcc-linaro/4.7. This is due to a BZR bug of some kind, so hopefully we won't have to work around it for too much longer. According to the nice folks at #bzr, here's how to do the same merge manually: bzr branch lp:gcc-lina

Re: GCC 4.7 runtime library plans

2012-04-02 Thread Matthias Klose
On 02.04.2012 03:49, Michael Hope wrote: On 23 March 2012 16:23, Michael Hope wrote: On 16 March 2012 14:54, Michael Hope wrote: Hi Ricardo, Matthias. GCC 4.7 is almost here and it's likely that Linaro GCC 4.7 will come out for next month's 2012.04 milestone. For the binary toolchain to wor