W dniu 30.04.2012 13:45, Marcin Juszkiewicz pisze:
W dniu 27.04.2012 03:30, Michael Hope pisze:
Could I also have a minimal sysroot that just has libc6 libc6-dev
libc6-dbg linux-libc-dev and zlib1g? We'll ship that with the binary
compiler. An example is here:
http://people.linar
W dniu 27.04.2012 03:30, Michael Hope pisze:
Hi Marcin. I've had a look at nano-dev. Please:
* Change the top directory from binary/boot/filesystem.dir/ to libc/
Will do.
* Remove etc
* Remove sbin, bin, usr/bin, usr/sbin
* Remove most under var
* Remove usr/local?
* Remove emp
I added Ubuntu 12.04 'precise' based sysroots to Jenkins yesterday. They
are built using 'armhf' architecture and available in three flavours:
- alip
- nano
- ubuntu-desktop
So far only -dev ones are present, will work on -dbg ones soon.
We have 'nano' one built and available to fetch at
http://
W dniu 16.03.2012 03:00, Matthias Klose pisze:
> On 16.03.2012 02:54, Michael Hope wrote:
>> Hi Ricardo, Matthias. GCC 4.7 is almost here and it's likely that
>> Linaro GCC 4.7 will come out for next month's 2012.04 milestone.
>>
>> For the binary toolchain to work we need the 4.7 runtime librarie
W dniu 07.03.2012 22:47, Ken Werner pisze:
> On 03/06/2012 01:26 AM, Michael Hope wrote:
>> Talking:
>> Say Hi to Validation re: EC2 and plans
>> Say Hi to the ARM landing team re: vexpress upstream support
>> Say Hi to Beth Flanagan re: Yocto's existing auto builders and any hints
>
> Yep, it lo
W dniu 07.03.2012 10:21, Zhenqiang Chen pisze:
> I try the sysroots to build small cases (with additional header files
> like ).
Ok. Inform me if any header will be missing.
BTW: which sysroot you are using to test?
> All can pass after coping the libgcc* to /lib
> (https://bugs.launchpad.net
Hi
Updated sysroots for binary toolchain are available at [1]. This time I
split -dev and -dbg sysroots so as long as dbgsym are not needed less
disk space is used.
Please take a look at them and report any issues.
1. http://people.linaro.org/~hrw/generic-linux/sysroots/20120301/
__
W dniu 29.02.2012 14:23, Marcin Juszkiewicz pisze:
Those packages may also work under Ubuntu 10.10 'maverick' and 11.04
'natty' but it was not tested. Users of Ubuntu 11.10 'oneiric' may
install libmpfr1ldbl package [2] and then use 'lucid' repositor
Linaro cross toolchain backport PPA [1] got updated to recent Ubuntu
12.04 versions:
- gcc 4.5.3
- gcc 4.6.2
- binutils 2.22
- eglibc 2.15
- linux 3.2
I tested both compiler versions against few packages, U-Boot and Linux
2.6.32.
Those packages may also work under Ubuntu 10.10 'maverick' a
W dniu 16.01.2012 15:51, Asa Sandahl pisze:
Thanks Michael for the walk through.
Matthias and Marcin: I am trying to find a new compiler for the bug
reporter of: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gcc-linaro/+bug/915689.
I was thinking it could be an option to install a new toolchain from the
linaro-ma
W dniu 20.09.2011 01:54, Michael Hope pisze:
> Nice. I backported libgmp10 and used it to build a simple C hello,
> world under lucid x86_64.
> The armel build seems to be a bit confused. It depends on gcc-4.4 but
> build-essentials is correctly pulling in 4.6. There's lots of 'gcc:
> not found
W dniu 16.09.2011 04:56, Michael Hope pisze:
> The Linaro Toolchain Working Group is pleased to announce the 2011.09
> release of both Linaro GCC 4.6 and Linaro GCC 4.5.
>
> Linaro GCC 4.6 2011.09-1 is the seventh release in the 4.6 series. Based
> off the latest GCC 4.6.1+svn178681, it contains
W dniu 22.08.2011 15:21, Marcin Juszkiewicz pisze:
> Hi
>
> Some time ago we agreed that not everyone here uses Ubuntu distribution
> and decided to provide so called 'generic linux' cross toolchain.
> Recently I managed to get it done and now need brave testers to te
Hi
Some time ago we agreed that not everyone here uses Ubuntu distribution
and decided to provide so called 'generic linux' cross toolchain.
Recently I managed to get it done and now need brave testers to tell is
it working or not.
Get it here: http://people.linaro.org/~hrw/generic-linux/ (64bit
On 29.07.2011 15:16, Matthias Klose wrote:
> the current gcc-4.6/eglibc is now built multilib'd for
> -mfloat-abi=softfp|hard, including the GCC runtime libraries. I hope
> that the gcc cross builds will pick this up soonish, not needing to
> build the cross compiler twice for softfp and hard float
On 08.07.2011 00:11, Michael Hope wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 1:36 AM, Marcin Juszkiewicz
>> There is no gcc-4.6 for Lucid currently as it requires newer versions of
>> few libraries (mpfr, mpc) and one of rule of this PPA is "do not update
>> packages which
Hi
Linaro backport PPA [1] got updated to latest versions of armel cross
toolchains -- oneiric packages were used as a base.
What got changed:
- gcc 4.4 was updated to 4.4.6-3ubuntu1
- gcc 4.5 was updated to 4.5.3-1ubuntu2
- binutils was updated to 2.21.52.20110606-1ubuntu1
- eglibc was updated
On czw, 2011-06-16 at 19:48 +0100, David Gilbert wrote:
> >> Ubuntu armel and armhf cross compilers, CSL 2011.03-42 have same
> >> problem.
> >
> > Compiled fine with gcc 4.3 from Poky toolchain. Same with Emdebian
> > gcc-4.3 cross compiler.
>
> Looks more to me like the old compilers are the one
On czw, 2011-06-16 at 20:31 +0200, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
> There is a ftbfs on armel bug for postler:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postler/+bug/791319
>
> Attached test compiles fine on amd64 but fails on armel:
>
> 20:16 hrw@malenstwo:postler-0.1.1$ gcc _bu
There is a ftbfs on armel bug for postler:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postler/+bug/791319
Attached test compiles fine on amd64 but fails on armel:
20:16 hrw@malenstwo:postler-0.1.1$ gcc _build_/.conf_check_0/test.c
_build_/.conf_check_0/test.c: In function ‘main’:
_build_/.conf_ch
Hi
Yesterday I looked at bug [1] in chromium-browser but checked oneiric
version: 12.0.742.91~r87961. It failed on linking to CUPS libraries so I
looked at upstream repository and found fix [2]. With patch applied it
failed on same place:
LINK(target) out/Release/chrome
[keep-alive] czw, 16 cze
Dnia 2011-03-26, sob o godzinie 16:00 -0700, Diane Holt pisze:
> As I mentioned, I can't use the one that's available as a
> debian pkg built by Linaro, because I need to use the toolchain in
> Scratchbox, which has a rather old libc (in its host_shared/lib), and
> the
> Linaro one was built again
On czw, 2011-03-03 at 09:04 +1300, Michael Hope wrote:
> It's funny how things happen at the same time. I've been asked a few
> times about how to compile Linaro GCC so I started this page a few
> days ago:
> https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/ToolChain/Using
>
> The goal is to describe how
Dnia poniedziałek, 20 grudnia 2010 o 20:03:03 Mark Mitchell napisał(a):
> I'm not trying to take an extreme position; I'm really looking for an
> answer here. We've got something approaching 100 engineers doing
> ARM-oriented work in various components. They build on ARM, test on
> ARM, benchmar
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/other-linaro-n-cross-compilers:
- wrote patches for creating backports PPA
- each component [1] generates versioned -source binary package
(eglibc-2.12.1-source etc)
- a-c-t-b [2] got "PPA" boolean variable in rules to have one source package
Dnia środa, 1 grudnia 2010 o 04:01:04 Michael Hope napisał(a):
> Hopefully it's easy to follow. It uses a binary sysroot and gives you
> vanilla binutils 2.20 and Linaro GCC 2010.11 in a good enough way that
> you can cross-compile for Maverick. The script is minimal and trades
> readability for
Like everyone from Toolchain WG I will share my activites in last week:
1. cross compilers for archive
- discussed with doko about dropping update-alternatives use
- wrote gcc-defaults-armel-cross 1.4 which does proper symlinks for cross
compilers
- wrote gcc-4.5-armel-cross 1.41 which removes
Dnia piątek, 12 listopada 2010 o 18:33:03 Dave Martin napisał(a):
> * -mimplicit-it is already required by the Linux kernel and
> possible other projects.
Qt and KDE4 require -mimplicit-it=thumb too. It is disabled in Ubuntu gcc-4.5
and as a result it does not build on armel without setting it
Dnia wtorek, 9 listopada 2010 o 00:09:03 Michael Hope napisał(a):
> I agree on the approach. I'm concerned about moving over to SVN for a
> few reasons:
> harder merging (with bzr you do a 'bzr merge lp:gcc' and it does a good,
> three way merge with trunk. Last time I used svn for this it was a
Dnia środa, 3 listopada 2010 o 19:19:22 Michael Hope napisał(a):
> Hi there. I plan to change the Toolchain WG meetings due to daylight
> savings and to better cover the US.
> The standup calls will be merged into one at 1800 UTC on Wednesday
> which is 6 pm in the UK, 7 pm in central Europe, and
Some of Linaro developers works with ARM devices older then ARMv7-a
architecture. Other people experiments with hard-float ABI. Each of them has
to rebuild toolchain for own use and that means playing with components to
have them build properly.
But it is no more - I made some patches and arme
Some of Linaro developers works with ARM devices older then ARMv7-a
architecture. Other people experiments with hard-float ABI. Each of them has
to rebuild toolchain for own use and that means playing with components to
have them build properly.
But it is no more - I made some patches and arme
Dnia piątek, 8 października 2010 o 02:52:13 Michael Hope napisał(a):
> Hi Marcin. Would you consider passing
> --enable-poison-system-directories to the cross compiler configure?
> This makes the '-Wpoison-system-directories' option available which
> warns you if the cross compiler picks up a lib
Dnia środa, 6 października 2010 o 00:10:58 Michael Hope napisał(a):
> (cc'ed to linaro-toolchain, bcc'ed to others who may be interested)
>
> I'm considering adding a new Linaro Toolchain meeting to cover people
> in the North/South American timezones. We've got quite a few people
> in that area
Dnia poniedziałek, 4 października 2010 o 14:17:36 Tim Gardner napisał(a):
> Is there any reason not to get these packages in universe ala Maverick?
> I'm finding the Maverick packages to be real handy for cross compiling
> ARM stuff, but Lucid will be around for a lot longer.
Those packages requi
Hi
I finally built armel cross compiler packages for Ubuntu 10.04 'Lucid' LTS.
They are available in unsigned APT repository:
deb http://people.canonical.com/~hrw/ubuntu-lucid-armel-cross-compilers/ ./
They are built from Maverick packages:
- binutils-source
- eglibc-source
- gcc-4.4-source
-
Dnia czwartek, 16 września 2010 o 22:35:30 Steve Langasek napisał(a):
> On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 06:19:28PM +0200, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
> > 1. a-c-t-base is at 1.47 in archive and was built from gcc-4.5-source
> >I have a version which does not provide gcc-4.5-arm-lin
I think that it is easier to describe situation in email then on irc.
Currently there are 4 packages related to cross compilation support:
- armel-cross-toolchain-base (a-c-t-base in short)
- gcc-4.4-armel-cross
- gcc-4.5-armel-cross
- gcc-defaults-armel-cross
Each of them got into archive but
I would like to announce that my work on armel cross toolchain got to the very
nice point - all packages are available from PPA.
What does it mean to you?
1. no "are you sure to install those unverified packages" messages from APT
2. ability to easily rebuild toolchain on own machines
So if yo
I want to share status of my cross compiler packages work with all of you.
Some time ago I did a split of them into two:
- armel-cross-toolchain-base (1.36 now)
- armel-cross-toolchain (1.29 now)
Where first one provides binutils, linux headers, libc6 and libgcc
packages. Second provides f
Dnia piątek, 16 lipca 2010 o 16:59:46 Marcin Juszkiewicz napisał(a):
> As you probably know I am working on bootstrapping cross compiler. Process
> is described on https://wiki.linaro.org/CrossCompilers page.
>
> Current status is: nearly done.
I have 12 bugs to be merged but hope to
Dnia środa, 28 lipca 2010 o 19:16:42 Hector Oron napisał(a):
> Hello Marcin,
>
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 01:06:15PM +0200, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
> > To make it possible I also have to alter contents of *-source binary
> > packages from binutils/eglibc/gcc/linux to have a
Dnia wtorek, 27 lipca 2010 o 14:03:57 Loïc Minier napisał(a):
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2010, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
> > And here I have a problem. How much of debian/ directory should be
> > provided in *-source binary packages? Minimal set just to be able to
> > call "dpkg
Hi
As some of you know I am working on cross compiler packages for Ubuntu. Those
of you who know what Emdebian is probably use their repositories for such
stuff. Thats ok - I just want to share with you what my job will bring in near
future and what I have done in last 3 months.
Since 26th Ap
44 matches
Mail list logo
