At 7:11 AM 3/5/2, Ken Prat wrote:
> Please stop this thread now. Anyone who thinks Flash will
> replace Director doesn't have any idea what the other tool does.
> It's ridiculous.
Thanks, Ken, Kurt, others. I'm getting really tired of trying to reassure
people of the obvious myself.
Recap: Direc
RE:
--
>From: Stuart Heimdal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: The new director?
>Date: Tue, Mar 5, 2002, 12:33 AM
>OK, so I've just spent the last year of my life learning Director for what?
>Now it looks as though I'll
At 12:05 -0500 03/05/2002, Colin Holgate wrote:
>My request in the past has been to make a Macromedia Web Studio kind
>of product, that includes both Flash and Director. I'm not against
>using Flash at all, and used inside Director it becomes better than
>either on their own.
I agree; this ki
But y'all have to agree that Flash has had more high-profile exposure than
director, and seems to have been helped along by Macromedia as well. I
don't blame them, as I too would push the product that was getting
attention.
With that in mind, it's sometimes been a hard sell with director in t
At 11:35 -0500 03/05/2002, the nightboy wrote:
>But to move from Lingo to actionscript is quite simple; it is a shame how
>people on both direct-l and flashcoders get so bent out of shape when the
>other software make leaps forward.
Agreed, but it happens largely because flame-trolling folks mak
>But to move from Lingo to actionscript is quite simple; it is a shame how
>people on both direct-l and flashcoders get so bent out of shape when the
>other software make leaps forward. Why not just learn both instead of beind
>tunnel visioned individuals.
My request in the past has been to make
>>The fact of the matter is that actionscript and lingo are very similar in
>>syntax, actionscript being slightly more "proper", in terms of traditonal
>>programming languages, and I find it quite simple to move back and forth.
>
>
>That's a bit misleading. It's true that using dot syntax in Direc
Alright, alright, - enough. ;) I'll quit worrying.
Take it easy on the new guy. :P
[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to
http://www.penworks.com/lingo-l.cgi To post messages to the list, email
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]). Lingo-
>The fact of the matter is that actionscript and lingo are very similar in
>syntax, actionscript being slightly more "proper", in terms of traditonal
>programming languages, and I find it quite simple to move back and forth.
That's a bit misleading. It's true that using dot syntax in Director
c
ECTED]]
Sent: 05 March 2002 15:33
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: The new director?
It's funny - the same sentiments have been voiced since '97, when Flash was
introduced, though they get more paranoid with each upgrade. I remember way
back in the early 90s, designers worrying that th
The fact of the matter is that actionscript and lingo are very similar in
syntax, actionscript being slightly more "proper", in terms of traditonal
programming languages, and I find it quite simple to move back and forth.
Brian Douglas (:ub)
Wow,
we have been discussing it on flashcoders, but the examples look pretty
damn good.
Brian Douglas (:ub)
[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to
http://www.penworks.com/lingo-l.c
It's funny - the same sentiments have been voiced since '97, when Flash was
introduced, though they get more paranoid with each upgrade. I remember way
back in the early 90s, designers worrying that the new Photoshop filters
were going to do them in, because "now anybody can make a drop shadow".
At 23:33 -0700 03/04/2002, Stuart Heimdal wrote:
>OK, so I've just spent the last year of my life learning Director for what?
Oh for Pete's sake quit panicking. Macromedia has made it VERY CLEAR
they intend to keep Director going.
Any implication to the contrary is flame bait laid by a pro-Fla
Please stop this thread now. Anyone who thinks Flash will replace Director
doesn't have any idea what the other tool does. It's ridiculous. Do we
really need another Flash kills Director thread in our lives ever again?
> Why will you have to? Would you like to explain this statement?
> Are we bei
Why will you have to? Would you like to explain this statement? Are we being spammed
by the I love Flash and want to marry it user group? ;)
-Original Message-
From: Stuart Heimdal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 05 March 2002 06:33
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: The new director
OK, so I've just spent the last year of my life learning Director for what?
Now it looks as though I'll get to learn ActionScript and JavaScript in the
near future. (not that that's such a terrible thing). Just a little
frustrating is all. (I'm just starting to get the hang of lingo - fairly
ea
17 matches
Mail list logo
