On Jun 24, 2004, at 7:24 PM, Pedja Guzvica wrote:
I like to have 15 apps running at the same time and
not hearing any complains about "not having enough memory"
OS9 is dead. Give it a rest.
--
Troy
RPSystems, Ltd.
http://www.rpsystems.net
[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest
ginal Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jakob Hede
Madsen
Sent: 24 June 2004 19:12
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: dual monitor projector?
At 11:29 +1200 24/06/04, Tony Bray wrote:
>We don't need another my Macs better than your PC battle.
O
At 11:29 +1200 24/06/04, Tony Bray wrote:
We don't need another my Macs better than your PC battle.
Ok, but my Mac is better than my PC... Hey even your Mac is probably
better than my PC, possibly even better than my Mac, and your PC is
likely... Nah I won't go there. :-)
Jakob
[To remove your
Dough!???
What's this all about?
We all know that "ET's" are more advanced than us and that our poor
technology is...well...still...on all levels...crap!
Now...Mac's and PC's are crap too and if it wasn't for the only cross
platform App that brings us all here the whole universe would
collapse...
Cath, Windows has overtaken the Mac's capabilities with 2 monitors
already
as long as you use XP and a modern dual head graphic card.
Let's be careful, boys and girls, this is going to end up in tears :-0
We don't need another my Macs better than your PC battle.
Just for the record, when I am tut
overtaken ?
just out of interest: do you care to elaborate, what are the
advantages of windows in regards to multiple monitors, other
than requiring dual head graphic cards instead of being able
to handle two seperate cards properly ?
--
Hi Alex!
Beeing a Mac fan, this is hard to say: I have been w
On 24 Jun 2004, at 4:01, Alex da Franca wrote:
Cath, Windows has overtaken the Mac's capabilities with 2 monitors
already
as long as you use XP and a modern dual head graphic card.
Let's be careful, boys and girls, this is going to end up in tears :-0
We don't need another my Macs better than your
>
> ah OK I see, I just feared I had missed something.
> so it are the same reasons, that windows has 'overtaken' mac
> in general, cheaper hardware, faster and inconsistent.
> it reminds me a bit of the advantage of being able to eject a
> CD-ROM, while it is in use...
> (I always felt uncomfo
At 16:04 Uhr +0200 23.06.2004, Florian Bogeschdorfer wrote:
Why I say "overtaken" is simply, that
1. cards are faster
2. cards are much cheaper (a 49.99 USD will do)
3. There are more settings (like the one huge desktop)
4. At least on my macs I have to reboot or go asleep and wake up to use a
fres
> overtaken ?
> just out of interest: do you care to elaborate, what are the
> advantages of windows in regards to multiple monitors, other
> than requiring dual head graphic cards instead of being able
> to handle two seperate cards properly ?
> --
Hi Alex!
Beeing a Mac fan, this is hard to
>I can independently configure size, colour depth or positioning, and
>synchronize them all too.
So, I think was was meant by "overtaken" was: "finally caught up with"...
[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to
http://www.penworks.com/lingo-l.cgi To post messages t
hem, I can independently configure size, colour depth
or positioning, and synchronize them all too. And I'm not running a super computer
either!
-Original Message-
From: Alex da Franca [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 23 June 2004 09:55
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: dual mo
At 9:51 Uhr +0200 23.06.2004, Florian Bogeschdorfer wrote:
Cath, Windows has overtaken the Mac's capabilities with 2 monitors already
as long as you use XP and a modern dual head graphic card.
overtaken ?
just out of interest: do you care to elaborate,
what are the advantages of windows in regards
>
> Hi Tony,
> I don't have the option to use a Mac for this project, but I
> will be trying all the options to see what works best on
> whatever final platform is chosen.
> Thanks for the offer of help!
>
Cath, Windows has overtaken the Mac's capabilities with 2 monitors already
as long as y
Hi Tony,
I don't have the option to use a Mac for this project, but I will be trying
all the options to see what works best on whatever final platform is chosen.
Thanks for the offer of help!
Cath
At 01:06 p.m. 23/06/2004 +1200, you wrote:
Hi Cath
Nice to see another Kiwi "Director" ;-)
I am abou
Thanks for all the advice!
I am looking forward to getting it going!
Cath
At 11:24 a.m. 22/06/2004 -0400, you wrote:
> I am about to start a project which will use two monitors -
> one will run
> video and the other the interface. Has anyone done this? Is
> the best way to
> treat the stage as one
> I am about to start a project which will use two monitors -
> one will run
> video and the other the interface. Has anyone done this? Is
> the best way to
> treat the stage as one large stage covering both monitors?
> Any pitfalls? Advice?
Colin gave you some good advice. I would emphasize C
>
> I may have missed that part. The ones I've done have had a
> touch screen for the first display, and additional graphics
> or video shown on the second display. Having scripts in the
> first monitor area that send messages or talk directly with
> sprites that are on the stage in the secon
But the thread was about having a controller on one monitor and the output
on the second, right.
I may have missed that part. The ones I've done have had a touch
screen for the first display, and additional graphics or video shown
on the second display. Having scripts in the first monitor area th
> If you're just going to show video on the second monitor,
> then a MIAW might well work. If any graphics need to span or
> move between the two areas, having the stage fill both
> screens is very convenient.
>
But the thread was about having a controller on one monitor and the output
on the
I do not agree in all points. I guess this is not a CD-Rom for sale, is it?
It is a special project for a limited, known range of customers. Since
almost every modern graphic card can handle two monitors (even the ATI SE
series) I would recommend to run the stage on monitor 1 and a MIAW in
monitor
>
> >I am about to start a project which will use two monitors - one will
> >run video and the other the interface. Has anyone done this? Is the
> >best way to treat the stage as one large stage covering both
> monitors?
> >Any pitfalls? Advice?
>
> Yes, yes, and yes. It may vary depending on
I am about to start a project which will use two monitors - one will
run video and the other the interface. Has anyone done this? Is the
best way to treat the stage as one large stage covering both
monitors?
Any pitfalls? Advice?
Yes, yes, and yes. It may vary depending on which video board you'
23 matches
Mail list logo
