Greetings; (Posted to VMESA-L and VSE-L and LINUX-390)
- - - Now in its fourth year! - - - - - - Now includes VSE! - - -
- - - - Now includes linux/390 - - - -
I have set up a public service web page at
http://www.eskimo.com/~wix/vm/
for posting positions available and
Folks,
I forwarded your question to Uli WEigand and Hartmut Penner
They know best about the gcc and its bugs ;)
Best Regards
Holger Smolinski
--
Dr. Holger Smolinski, Tech. Planning (Storage I/O) for Linux on zSeries
IBM Deutschland Entwicklung GmbH,Schönaicher Str. 220, 71032 Böblingen
Hi..
When I try to re-link the Oracle binaries, Iam getting the following error:
/oracle/ora901/rdbms/lib/opimai.o: file not recognized: File format
not recognized
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make: *** [/oracle/ora901/rdbms/lib/oracle] Error 1
Iam having Suse
Vic wrote:
On this list, there seem to be more Linux people than mainframe
people (or
maybe the Linux folk are more vocal), so you'd be forgiven for
thinking that
popular opinion goes in favour of RedHat. But it's been discussed
in the
past that most Linux/390 or
And among the mainframe people are some who remember the great OCO war of
the late 80's, early 90's between the VM world and IBM. A compromise (of
sorts) was reached where that part of VM that had always been source code
would remain so and so would new features that were not related to
I think I am doing something wrong, but I'm not sure what. I'm am trying
to
write a very simple IOCTL module using kernel version 2.4.5 from
TurboLinux.
I have included uaccess.h and I call the module copy_from_user. The
module
compiles correctly, but when I do an insmod on it I get an
Carol Saparnis wrote:
I think I am doing something wrong, but I'm not sure what. I'm am trying to
write a very simple IOCTL module using kernel version 2.4.5 from TurboLinux.
I have included uaccess.h and I call the module copy_from_user. The module
compiles correctly, but when I do an insmod
I think that most installations where Linux/390 is being installed
or tried have already accepted that large business risk by installing and
using IBM hardware and software in the first place. All of which is
patented,
copyrighted and licensed. I doubt that using a few kB of OCO OSA drivers
is
Hi!
Thank you! Thank you! Thank you!
That was it! I am compiling outside the normal build process. __KERNEL__,
__SMP__, and __MODULE__ are defined in my source, so my compile statement
looks like: gcc -Wall -I/usr/include -O2 -c tstioctl.c
Are there other parameters that I should be
Hi Carol,
That was it! I am compiling outside the normal build process. __KERNEL__,
__SMP__, and __MODULE__ are defined in my source, so my compile statement
looks like: gcc -Wall -I/usr/include -O2 -c tstioctl.c
Are there other parameters that I should be including?
Well, I think it
Gregg,
I am not 100% sure if you're talking about the Slackware port only, or
something else that goes with it. You also didn't mention any names of the
Slackware folks you spoke with at LWE. However, yes, the people at
Slackware were aware of the port. Mike Kershaw and I had been in frequent
Florian La Roche [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Are there some history pages about these discussions?
The entire history of VM, including Melinda Varian's VM and
the Community paper (an excellantly researched history, based
on years of interviews with key players) is online. The VM
community literally
I would imagine that some of that discussion has been preserved. Up until
recently I had a copy of the OCO white paper that was developed by the VM
group at SHARE. At that time (and perhaps still) it was the most cogent
argument as to why IBM should not remove access to the source code for VM.
Hello from Gregg C Levine normally with Jedi Knight Computers
Sheepish grin inserted here Mark, I did not mention who I spoke with,
because I actually do not remember who I spoke with, then. It has been
about a full year since then, after all, and the next LWE is practically
around the corner. I
On Thu, 27 Dec 2001, Dennis G. Wicks wrote:
I think that most installations where Linux/390 is being installed
or tried have already accepted that large business risk by installing and
using IBM hardware and software in the first place. All of which is
patented, copyrighted and licensed. I
Does anyone know if IBM or REDHAT will be offering redhat/390 centric
education ?
Thanks,
SG
Thanks to all for your responses.
I was able to properly code my qeth parameters with the portname and bring
up my
network with my rescue system. The bad news is, I destroyed my test system
doing it (don't ask).
What better way to learn :)
Thanks,
SG
-Original Message-
From: Post,
Sorry, there is no difference at all. My current hardware and software are
working just fine, thank you. So it is not at all different than if IBM or
RedHat had gone belly up. I would still be stuck with an old kernel or
operating system, exactly as I am now because I have no upgrade path
... not
Interesting approach to bringing LINUX into IT dept (CIO Magazine)
http://www.cio.com/archive/010102/shop.html
R. Greve
SDSU Computing Services
My mistake, I confused myself. Time to change feet...
I think what I was getting at is the packaging/kernel versioning used by
RedHat, which means that their 2.4.9 kernel is not called '2.4.9', but
'2.4.9-something special', which means you can't fit a version-labelled
module into it. My
Sandy,
I don't know if they well be or not, but I don't think that would be really
necessary. The S/390-specific parts are a very small percentage of the
whole learning curve. If you took any distribution-specific education (and
there's plenty of it out there for Intel-based Linux), you'd have
On Fri, 28 Dec 2001, John Summerfield wrote:
There is a good reason for the way RH names its kernels. ...
SuSE is following RedHat's lead
and making it harder for the customer to run third party modules.
I'm wondering if version information on all symbols might help.
That's the
If I try to run any tk GUI application, the fonts do not appear clearly.
What am I missing?
Thanks,
Samy Rengasamy.
-Original Message-
From: saparnis, carol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 11:16 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Help, copy_from_user_asm
Both z/VM 4.2 Hipersockets PTFs (UM30225 for CP and UQ61461 for TCP/IP) are COR
closed and available for ordering.
Best Regards,
Les Geer
IBM z/VM and Linux Development
24 matches
Mail list logo
