OT discussions (was Re: IBM announces LINUX-only 1 to 4 engine zSeries)

2002-01-29 Thread Rob van der Heij
> It's the only Linux list that goes into reminiscing like this at times. > The others I'm on or have been on are full of young upstarts who think > they know everything when they know nothing. I think it is remarkable how we managed to keep discussions on this list so focussed. I also subscribe

Re: Installing RH 7.2 with Hipersockets

2002-01-29 Thread Rob van der Heij
> When I try using the qdio driver, I get a bunch of "attempt to access > beyond end of device" errors. Help? Welcome! Adding the OCO modules grew the (unzipped) initrd beyond the 9216 blocks that apparently is the default with RedHat (the mkocord specifically extends the initrd.img for that). I

Red Hat "rawhide" update

2002-01-29 Thread Florian La Roche
Another update for the installation code as well as the anaconda and s390utils rpms has been done at ftp://ftp.redhat.de/pub/s390-rawhide and ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/rawhide/s390/. If no further bug-reports come in about this version, we will push out official updates for the Red Ha

Antwort: NT server consolidation with samba

2002-01-29 Thread Tim-Chr. Hanschen
Hi Matthias, first of all, samba is full compatible with WinNT, that means that you can easy integrate a linux fileserver into a winnt domain, without any changes. You can make a machine account at the domain controller, so that the password handling is done by the domain controller. You do not

Installing RH 7.2 with Hipersockets

2002-01-29 Thread Adam Thornton
Has anyone done this? I have an initrd built with the OCO modules and z/VM at the appropriate level to use HiperSockets (many of my other Linux guests are doing so). I think I must modify the /linuxrc to get it to believe that HiperSockets are the right thing, and additionally do something like

FTP directory ??

2002-01-29 Thread Ken Dreger: Dr. \"D\"
I HAVE JUST DOWNLOADED all THE REDHAT OS390 FILES TO MY DESKTOP 60 GIG. REMOVABLE DISK. I HAVE A FTP SERVER ON IT AND WANT TO TAKE IT TO ANOTHER INSTALLATION TO SERVE AS A FTP SERVER. So the question is: what dir do I need to load up to the ftp server so when I load the boot strap kernel in for

Moving a DASD Volume

2002-01-29 Thread Len Thomson
I am running a Linux390 system in an LPAR with a couple of dedicated DASD volumes. We are about to decommission the DASD unit they are installed on and I have to move these volumes off onto another unit. How do I do this? - Can I use DF/DSS Physical Volume Copy or something like that? or do I hav

Re: IBM announces LINUX-only 1 to 4 engine zSeries

2002-01-29 Thread Jim Pierson
Hey... I resemble that statement :) -Original Message- From: John Summerfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 4:27 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: IBM announces LINUX-only 1 to 4 engine zSeries [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > Interesting history, but is thi

[patch] Re: Linux for S/390: alpha patch for the IUCV device driv er for linux-2.2.16 now on developerWorks.

2002-01-29 Thread Patterson, Ross
Way back on Thu, 11 Oct 2001 at 15:48:40, Despina Papadopoulou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >An alpha patch for the IUCV device driver for linux-2.2.16 >is now available for download on developerWorks. > >You can find the patch and the release notes at: >http://www10.software.ibm.com/developerwork

[patch] "make clean" doesn't quite

2002-01-29 Thread Patterson, Ross
A "make clean" or "make mrproper" against the Linux kernel for S/390 doesn't quite do the job. This patch, for 2.2.16, will make those commands clean up the dasdfmt and silo directories as well. Enjoy, Ross Patterson Computer Associates diff -urN linux-2.2.16-old/arch/s390/Makefile linux-2.2.16

Re: getting GB ethernet working with SLES 7

2002-01-29 Thread Jim Sibley
John Taylor wrote: >What I don't know is how to manually concoct an "insmod qeth" command so >as to get this working. insmod qeth qeth_options=noatuo,0xee00,0xee01,0xee02,portname:OSA1 add_parms,0x10,0xee00,0xee02,portname:OSA1 (Note where upper case is used - only the portname - assuming there

Re: IBM announces LINUX-only 1 to 4 engine zSeries

2002-01-29 Thread John Summerfield
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > Interesting history, but is this really relevant for the LINUX list ? Relax and enjoy. Only the best lists do this. It's the only Linux list that goes into reminiscing like this at times. The others I'm on or have been on are full of young upstarts who think they know e

RAID / md

2002-01-29 Thread Mark . Pace
I am assuming the the root partition / could be part of a RAID configuration. But for that to happen does anything special need to be on a non-RAID device? Such as /boot? TIA. Mark D Pace Senior Systems Engineer Mainline Information Systems 1700 Summit Lake Drive Tallahassee, FL. 32311 [EMAI

Sterling Commerce to Offer CONNECT:Direct for Linux On IBM eServe r zSeries

2002-01-29 Thread Post, Mark K
For all you CONNECT :Direct fans out there... http://www.stercomm.com/about/news/pressrelease.asp?release=536 Mark Post

Re: OSA

2002-01-29 Thread Terry Spaulding
William, If the previous OS such as OS/390 had the OSA defined to it the portname will be specified by OS/390. Change your TCPIP defs for zVM to specify the original portname from the previous or other OS sharing the adapter. If the portnames match you can share the OSA adapter. I recently ran in

Re: OSA

2002-01-29 Thread Scully, William
Hmm. I confess my changes to /etc/modules.conf included a portname in lower-case. I can retry this with upper-case. I'll also try to give one path to the OSA adapter to VM and one to Linux, both using the same pathname. Thanks for the idea. I'll report back here with my results! -Orig

Re: OSA

2002-01-29 Thread Post, Mark K
William, Well, the "obvious" thing to try is have VM (or some other system) _specify_ a portname, so that can match that value (using all uppercase) on your Linux/390 system. :) Mark Post -Original Message- From: Scully, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 200

Re: OSA

2002-01-29 Thread Scully, William
The Linux systems are running under VM in an LPAR. Other nodes using the OSA adapters are in separate LPARs. I've asked and I'm told that no other system explicitly specifies a portname. I wanted to check this assertion. So we took one of the "failing" OSA adapters and gave it to TCP/IP on

Re: OSA

2002-01-29 Thread John P Taylor
Is the VM system in an LPAR? If so and another system uses the GB ethernet adapter, which is IPLed before yours, then I believe that system would determine what the portname is. Just a thought. >> ...we're suddenly having trouble using our OSA adapters. The problem first >surfaced after VM was

OSA

2002-01-29 Thread Scully, William
For reasons unknown we're suddenly having trouble using our OSA adapters. The problem first surfaced after VM was recently restarted after the upgrade of the processor microcode. Here's a snip from the console log: Setting up network device eth0 loading QDIO base support loading qeth S/

Re: getting GB ethernet working with SLES 7

2002-01-29 Thread Coffin Michael C
Hi John, It's just a guess, but have you tried using lower case alpha's in your hex addresses, i.e.: noauto,0xEE00,0xEE01,0xEE02,portname:OSA1,eth0 becomes noauto,0xee00,0xee01,0xee02,portname:osa1,eth0 I frequently find that nothing in upper case works in Linux (but that's not always true, and

getting GB ethernet working with SLES 7

2002-01-29 Thread John P Taylor
OK, I've looked at previous posts on this topic but can't put this together so that it works. There is no problem when I use SuSE 7.0, I simply specify the control-read,write and data options with the portname option during the initial ramdisk install and hey presto it works: noauto,0xEE00,0xEE01

Re: IBM announces LINUX-only 1 to 4 engine zSeries

2002-01-29 Thread Dennis G. Wicks
How can you tell where you're goin' if you don't know where you've been? Or in more modern terms "Been there, done that." And that oldie but goodie; "Those who don't study history are doomed to repeat it." "Tormey, Paul P" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 01/29/2002 08:09:20 AM

Re: dedicate DASD "not operational" under z/VM 4.1

2002-01-29 Thread Ingo Adlung
Holger, you confuse me - we can deal with VM rejecting our SPID requests. Worked fine with minidisk and dedicated disks in the past. Did smth change ? Best regards, Ingo ** Ingo Adlung, Linux for zSeries - Strategy & Design T

Re: dedicate DASD "not operational" under z/VM 4.1

2002-01-29 Thread Holger Smolinski
Did you define the DASDs as 'unsupported' in z/VM? z/VM imagining the device to be supported by itself prevents it from allowing a SetPathGroupID. Best Regards Holger Smolinski -- Dr. Holger Smolinski, Tech. Planning (Storage I/O) for Linux on zSeries IBM Deutschland Entwicklung GmbH,Schö

NT server consolidation with samba

2002-01-29 Thread Matthias . Wittpoth
Hello, currently we are evaluating the use of samba in an nt server consolidation project. We need to figure out if the samba server is 100 % compatible with our nt file servers or what differences exists. We plan to use samba 2.2 with suse and the samba server should be integrated as a member in

Re: dedicate DASD "not operational" under z/VM 4.1

2002-01-29 Thread Carsten Otte
Hi List, we've seen this problem before. Our investigation shows: - devices respond to SenseID in a correct way - devices respond to SetPathGroupID with a "deferred not operational" We think this problem is due to VM (other scenario was also caused by VM upgrade). Currently, VM folks are investi

Re: IBM announces LINUX-only 1 to 4 engine zSeries

2002-01-29 Thread Don Stubbs
PFR was not supported in OS/360 (MFT nor MVT) IOCS at least through Rel. 21 and yes it was supported in DOS which was the "logical" upgrade path for 1400 series customers. You had to write your own channel progams ensuring the correct ordering of type A and B CCW's. I wrote a civilian payroll sy

Re: dedicate DASD "not operational" under z/VM 4.1

2002-01-29 Thread Ferguson, Neale
What does a query of the real devices show? What does the CP directory entry of the Linux guest look like? > -Original Message- > Hi, > We installed Linux under z/VM 4.1 which is upgraded > from VM 2.4. Yesterday we restart the VM include all > related hardware power off/power on becaus

Re: IBM announces LINUX-only 1 to 4 engine zSeries

2002-01-29 Thread Tormey, Paul P
Interesting history, but is this really relevant for the LINUX list ? Paul Tormey Standard Bank of South Africa LAN Services -Original Message- From: Don Stubbs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29 January, 2002 16:05 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: IBM announces LINUX-only 1 to 4 engi

dedicate DASD "not operational" under z/VM 4.1

2002-01-29 Thread I-kuan Tsai
Hi, We installed Linux under z/VM 4.1 which is upgraded from VM 2.4. Yesterday we restart the VM include all related hardware power off/power on because of maintainence reason (just restart, not change in system), but after that we cannot start the linux servers properly. Now Linux can only dete

Re: IBM announces LINUX-only 1 to 4 engine zSeries

2002-01-29 Thread Phil Payne
> Punch read-feed might not have been included in OS360 (Why OS?) but is was > in DOS. Our 2540 punch station had the optional read feature and we read > cards and punched new info in them all the time. This was on a 360-40 > running three partition DOS. PFR was certainly possible under OS/360

Re: IBM announces LINUX-only 1 to 4 engine zSeries

2002-01-29 Thread Don Stubbs
For uncompressed object desks, location 56 in the next card contained the next "loading" instruction if a remember correctly. With no recollection of an "I" opcode for read, I searched and found http://1401.org/op-codes/. You were probably thinking of the clear storage and branch (i.e. /056). My

Re: zSeries Offering for Linux announce letter

2002-01-29 Thread Phil Payne
> The US announcement letter for the subject product is now on IBMLink. > > http://www.ibmlink.ibm.com/usalets&parms=H_102-030 Looks a nice clean announcement. One might wonder at the inclusion of Subspace Group Facility ... -- Phil Payne The Devil's IT Dictionary - last updated 2002/01/20:

Re: IBM announces LINUX-only 1 to 4 engine zSeries

2002-01-29 Thread Causey, James F.
Punch read-feed might not have been included in OS360 (Why OS?) but is was in DOS. Our 2540 punch station had the optional read feature and we read cards and punched new info in them all the time. This was on a 360-40 running three partition DOS. -Original Message- From:

Re: Unsubscribe

2002-01-29 Thread Uno Bengtsson
Med vänliga hälsningar/Best regards Uno Bengtsson Senior IT Specialist IBM Svenska AB, 164 92 Stockholm, Sweden Phone: +46 8 793 2326Mobile: +46 70 793 2326 SMS: [EMAIL PROTECTED] e-mail/Sametime: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: IBM announces LINUX-only 1 to 4 engine zSeries

2002-01-29 Thread Phil Payne
> 1 read from card readers ISTR 'I' was read a card. Operand A (if present) was the branch location - boot decks were a succession of 'I056' commands - the boot deck itself was executed to move its own contents into storage and set word marks. On a more relevant topic, the formal Announ

Re: IBM announces LINUX-only 1 to 4 engine zSeries

2002-01-29 Thread Don Stubbs
Not true IBM had other lines such as the 7090 series that were more powerful, high-end machines. The 1401 was a string machine using BCD. Fields were delimited by wordmarks and each instruction's opcode had to be wordmarked. Machine registers could not be directly addressed but one could us

Re: RH rhsetup "server" install did not install Samba RPM's

2002-01-29 Thread John Summerfield
> Dave, > > You're looking at the wrong file, s390/RedHat/base/packages.server, and not > s390/RedHat/base/list. If you look at s390/RedHat/base/list, you'll see > fully qualified file names. > > My guess is that what is happening during the install process is grossly > something like this: > for

zSeries Offering for Linux announce letter

2002-01-29 Thread Jim Elliott
The US announcement letter for the subject product is now on IBMLink. http://www.ibmlink.ibm.com/usalets&parms=H_102-030 Regards, Jim Elliott - Linux Advocate, IBM Canada Ltd.

Re: IBM announces LINUX-only 1 to 4 engine zSeries

2002-01-29 Thread Jim Elliott
> This begs the question: Does the $400,000 entry fee include the > disk, or only z/VM and the processor? Scott: The price does not include the disk subsystem. You can attach any ESCON or FICON supported disk subsystem. Of course we would prefer it to be Shark, but it could be your SVA box (or ev

Re: IBM announces LINUX-only 1 to 4 engine zSeries

2002-01-29 Thread David Goodenough
I think we are both showing our age here, perhaps we should draw a veil over such murky history! "Wolfe, Gordon W" cc: Sent by: Linux onSubject: Re: IBM announces LINUX-only 1 to 4 engine zSeries

Unsubscribe

2002-01-29 Thread Davis, Andrew Phillip (SWD)
Thanks for all the info... Andrew MVS TSG x46169 Important: Internet communications are not necessarily secure and may be intercepted or changed after they are sent. The Abbey National Group does not accept liability for any such changes. If you wish to confirm the origin or content of this