> Hello from Gregg C Levine
> Just your average web page ...
C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator\LocalSettings\Temp\~7458936.htm is a web page?
On whose system?
THAT is my point.
--
Phil Payne
http://www.isham-research.com
+44 7785 302 803
+49 173 6242039
Hello from Gregg C Levine
Just your average web page supplying folks with the means of initiating
a registration process for the upcoming road show. Why? Phil, you are
raising a good point, however the point is that he was mentioning to
people on this list. Anyone who is subscribed to both lists,
> Relax Phil, nothing to over react about. It probably is not in Marist's
bit bucket. If anything, Len was relating verbatim something he noted on
a different list. As it happens I saw that message, and registered via
that poorly written web page. If anything, they have just US based
gatherings, s
Sole mod was a slight change to Makefile.in ... found (very painfully a
nested call to shtool from inside "libtool --mode=install" which kept
making the SRPM build fail during the install phase ... removed the call to
shtool, bingo, it built -- no functional code mods at all :-)
And, oh yes, I *d
Hello from Gregg C Levine normally with Jedi Knight Computers
Relax Phil, nothing to over react about. It probably is not in Marist's
bit bucket. If anything, Len was relating verbatim something he noted on
a different list. As it happens I saw that message, and registered via
that poorly written
> ..website C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator\Local Settings\Temp\~7458936.htm
>or in the
attached
> invitation.
Am I being invited to read this file on a CA internal hard drive? A cracking licence?
> (See attached file: 7-10 to 8-8 IBM Corp.htm)
And _THAT_ will be in the Marist bit buc
Following is a scoop from Slashdot,
Thomas C. Green at The Register seems to think Microsoft is after far more
than the 'ubiquitous security' they're pitching to the mainstream press. In
this lengthy article, he contends that Microsoft's latest plans are in many
ways an attempt to kill Linux by r
Free half-day seminar that explores the value of Linux on zSeries and
offers practical implementation advice. Please find agenda, cities, dates,
enrollment procedures at website C:\Documents and
Settings\Administrator\Local Settings\Temp\~7458936.htm or in the attached
invitation.
(See attached f
Jim, just a friendly warning to NOT distribute any Linux modifications to
non-IBMers without the permission of the IBM Open Source Steering
Committee. BOE is the defined distribution point for IBM contributions
to open source.
Alan Altmark
Sr. Software Engineer
IBM z/VM Development
James Ti
So, you don't have Windows NT/2000 file servers doing the same thing now?
We're not talking about creating shares on the client desktop systems, after
all. That can be turned off if they're concerned about that. But, if you
want to have a file server, it's either going to be Novell, NT/2000, or
I would have to say that whether or not a samba share exists or NOT, and
there is 1) no anti-virus software running 2) all current maintenance for
the operating system on the user PC, the security vulnerability exists. So
it's not SAMBA that creates this vulnerability per se, but the act of
window
I would agree with that statement, with some slight editing, such that it
reads:
"Windows opens a security vulnerability to the users PC." :)
Michael Coffin, VM Systems Programmer
Internal Revenue Service - Room 6527
Constitution Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20224
Voice: (202) 927-4188
>From what he told me it is the issue of creating SAMBA shares in Windows. It opens a
>security vulnerability to the users PC.
-Original Message-
From: Post, Mark K [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 2:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: print server/SAMBA
I too would be very interested in what your security concerns are.
Lionel B. Dyck, Systems Software Lead
Kaiser Permanente Information Technology
25 N. Via Monte Ave
Walnut Creek, Ca 94598
Phone: (925) 926-5332 (tie line 8/47
Jammie,
Perhaps if we knew what your security guy thinks the issue is, we might be
able to help.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Hall, Jammie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 2:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: print server/SAMBA
I have rh7.2 installed i
My goal is to get Samba up and running w/acl support on Suse 7.0 running
on the 390.
I currently have SLES with kernel 2.4.7, from reading the newsgroup I saw a
previous person had a problem with 2.4.7 and the patches from acl.bestbits.at
and the suggestion was to upgrade to 2.4.17, so that's wha
Can you be a little more specific "security issue regarding SAMBA" ??
I'm planning on doing the same thing myself.
Thanks,
Josh
-Original Message-
From: Hall, Jammie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 1:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: print server/SAMBA
I
I have rh7.2 installed in a LPAR. I have setup some network printers and used them
okay with SAMBA. However, our security guy informs me that will not "fly" in
production environment due to security issue regarding SAMBA. Is there an alternative
or do I have to "sell" this as is?
regards, j-me
Wall Street Firms To Get Hands-On Look At Linux From IBM
IBM plans to open its first-ever Linux showroom in New York this
summer to give Wall Street financial companies an up-close view of what
the operating system can do for their businesses.
http://computerworld.com/newsletter/0%2C4902%2C72128
I red IBM's book and trying to setup this chain.
My ldap.conf:
# Your LDAP server. Must be resolvable without using LDAP.
host 172.16.2.72
base profiletype=USER,sysplex=plex1,o=iba
binddn racfid=name,profiletype=USER,sysplex=plex1,o=iba
bindpw **
ldap_version 3
pam_login_attribute racfid
Jim,
Florian's already got you where you need to go, but just for general FYI, I
didn't use an SRPM to build the binaries. I downloaded the source from
apache.org, and used the .spec file from the Apache SRPM shipped with SuSE
7.0 as a starting point to create my own .spec file. That pretty muc
On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, Massimiliano Belardi wrote:
> I'm not able to find any appreciable informations about running Sap Application
>Server on Linux390 platform. Does anybody know if this is possible?
> Witch DataBase server is reccomended? DB2 UDB or Oracle? Witch distribibution is
>suggest
On Wednesday 26 June 2002 10:15, Massimiliano Belardi wrote:
> Hello,
> I'm not able to find any appreciable informations about running Sap
> Application Server on Linux390 platform. Does anybody know if this is
> possible? Witch DataBase server is reccomended? DB2 UDB or Oracle? Witch
> distr
>It's not that it's stopping because of a console event, it's just
>dropping dead at the OS level and I can't even bring it back with the
console.
Does the system drop dead without the timer patch as well? And can you do
a "#cp cpu all d p" after the system stopped and post the result?
blue skie
Hello,
I'm not able to find any appreciable informations about running Sap Application
Server on Linux390 platform. Does anybody know if this is possible?
Witch DataBase server is reccomended? DB2 UDB or Oracle? Witch distribibution is
suggested? Any informations and any web links are apprec
Not to renew the discussion about the Rudy de Graaf article, but just
a heads-up that I have submitted a fairly detailed response to his
article to the editors at LinuxWorld and I look forward to seeing it
in print as well.
-- db
26 matches
Mail list logo
