Hello,
I was wondering if anyone else had any experiences installing and
running Patrol under Linux/390, specifically how can it be installed so
it can be shared among Linux images. It seems to want lots of
directories in read/write mode. On stand alone Unix systems we tend to
give Patrol a 1-2gi
I am having a problem with JAVA... The documentation tells me goto
"java.sun.com" and " blackdown" for 1.3.1 I remenber that IBM has their
JAVA.
Which one do I use or get???
Hi,
this APAR was mainly done for the may2002 - stream and the "access boxed
dasd" feature.
We started issuing a SNID as the first command to the device in order to
determine locking status with this stream. Before, we used SNID only after
a rejected SPID (to determine if a PGID was already set)
What flavor of LINUX would you pick if you were starting from the beginning?
We are currently at this point and I'm looking for pros and cons. Thank you.
As with anything, "it depends."
What are your objectives?
If this is a just-learning-about-it project, and if you don't require
vendor support, Debian is easier to install than either SuSE or Red Hat,
comes with a relatively recent kernel, and is extremely easy to keep
up-to-date. If you can pr
Folks, we're looking for your help in checking out our
new version, CM_SAFE for Linux/UNIX server configuration
management/disaster recovery. Please check out the
Web page URL for more information. Thanks for your help!
John Hoffmann
===
For more info and
Then what version of JAVA do I need for ORACLE
Hi Tim,
I believe the kernel patches are incomplete as far as s390(x) is concerned.
You will need to rework the kernel patch that updates the svc table. This
table is written in assembler in the arch specific part. rsbac has the same
issue. It is quite trivial to do, but it needs to be done.
J
IBM - it has a jit. Blackdown doesn't (for s390). IBM have also just
released their 1.4 JDK for s390.
-Original Message-
I am having a problem with JAVA... The documentation tells me goto
"java.sun.com" and " blackdown" for 1.3.1 I remenber that IBM has their
JAVA.
Which one do
> I was wondering if anyone else had any experiences installing and
> running Patrol under Linux/390, specifically how can it be installed so
Umm ... yes! But it has been a while. (early adopter here) ;-)
> it can be shared among Linux images. It seems to want lots of
> directories in read
Wher Can I get the IBM version for Linux/390???
http://www.ibm.com/java
-Original Message-
Wher Can I get the IBM version for Linux/390???
I suggest you get IBM's version. It works, it was made my the manufacturer
of your system and its better (in my opinion) than Sun's or Blackdown's
implementation.
Regards,
Steve Guthrie
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Eddie Chen
Sent: T
1.4 was NOT tested with Oracle, I would go with the 1.3.1 which does work.
Phil
Eddie Chen wrote:
> Then what version of JAVA do I need for ORACLE
>
>
>
* Adam Thornton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-10-01 12:11]:
> As with anything, "it depends."
>
> What are your objectives?
>
> If this is a just-learning-about-it project, and if you don't require
> vendor support, Debian is easier to install than either SuSE or Red Hat,
> comes with a relatively r
I am attempting to install SLES7 in another instance. This time I want to
use LVM and create a volume group that contains /usr and /home. I am
following the procedure in the Redbook - Linux on zSeries and S/390: Systems
Management (SG24-6820) in section 3.2.2. I start the bootstrap program and
log
On Tuesday 01 October 2002 05:26 pm, Geyer, Thomas L. wrote:
> When YAST tries to mount the filesystems I
> get the following mount error :
> An error occurred mounting the file system of partition
> "/dev/dasda1"to the directory "/mnt:. Here is the error message of the
> 'mount' command:
Please disregard the attached email. I just found my problem. I had
neglected to format the filesystems.
I have been fighting this the past two days and I guess I gave up too soon.
Sorry...
Thomas L. Geyer
Email:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone:(330) 471-2073
Fax:(330) 471-4034
> -
Thanks for your speedy response. To answer your question yes, I created the
filesystems but neglected to format.
Thanks again...
Thomas L. Geyer
Email:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone:(330) 471-2073
Fax:(330) 471-4034
-Original Message-
From: Scott Courtney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tues
IBM and Redhat have an agreement since 21 september 2002 that
Redhat will run on al X- I- P- and Z-series
IBM will port Lotus Notes,Websphere and Tivoli to Redhat
Maybe that helps you to make a choice.
Regards,
Roger Boussen
business email : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
private email : [EMAIL PROTE
On Tue, 1 Oct 2002 19:08:45 +0100, Eddie Chen wrote:
> Then what version of JAVA do I need for ORACLE
Which ever one they certify for it. blackdown is AFAIK not certified for much
right now, so consider it a possible optional. Otherwise go with the what your
vendor recommends.
regards
On Tue, 1 Oct 2002 09:25:09 -0400, Abruzzese, Pat wrote:
>What flavor of LINUX would you pick if you were starting from the beginning?
>We are currently at this point and I'm looking for pros and cons. Thank you.
SuSE - IMHO, they have a dedication to quality and reputation for the same.
I have
On Tue, 1 Oct 2002 14:49:47 -0500, David Rock wrote:
>Another consideration is what applications you intend to run. Generally
>speaking, there are cases where one distribution will get more support
>than another by a particular software company (i.e. redhat rpms don't
>necessarily work on SuSE).
Websphere runs today on SuSE Linux. I have also heard that Lotus Domino will
be ported to Linux for S/390, there was no mention that it would be
specifically Redhat. If it was, it would be a grave mistake.
On Tuesday 01 October 2002 04:57 pm, you wrote:
> IBM and Redhat have an agreement since
Not grave if you want to PR buzz, remember key is "WILLBE PORTING" OR HAVE
:~)
Jon R. Doyle
Sendmail Inc.
6425 Christie Ave
Emeryville, Ca. 94608
(o_
(o_ (o_ //\
(/)_ (\)_ V_/_
On Tue, 1 Oct 2002, Rich Smrcina wrote:
> Websphere runs today on SuSE Linu
Per Jessen said:
> Guys, you've got to realise that using Linux does in no way tie you in
> with any particular vendor. ...
This is part of what we mean when we say
"free as in speech" -vs- Linux NOT being "free as in beer".
There are costs, but the customers hands are UNtied.
* Per Jessen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-10-02 00:32]:
> On Tue, 1 Oct 2002 14:49:47 -0500, David Rock wrote:
> >Another consideration is what applications you intend to run. Generally
> >speaking, there are cases where one distribution will get more support
> >than another by a particular software
Yes, as typical the MKT FUD usually is the factor, while it is correct
that RH and IBM press about this was made a couple weeks ago SuSE has had
ports for PPC based systems, for some time and just as many press
releases:
http://news.com.com/2110-1001-827608.html?tag=rn
The thing to consider is t
On Wed, 2 Oct 2002 06:21, you wrote:
> Probably a good way to _use_ (read how you
> want) GPL.
rpm is GPM. rpm is from Red Hat
Anaconda (RHL installer) is GPL. YAST (SuSE installer) is not.
In fact, all the RH software I've seen is GPL.
I think the implication you make that RH is somehow unfair
Hmm. I was hoping that the Linux software developers would have taken the
LSB and applied it to Linux/390. I guess I should say I was _expecting_
that. There are so few differences between Linux/390 and the others, it
just seemed to be the sensible thing to do.
Mark Post
-Original Message
On Wed, 2 Oct 2002 00:57, you wrote:
> IBM - it has a jit. Blackdown doesn't (for s390). IBM have also just
> released their 1.4 JDK for s390.
Benchmark it before you decide the IBM one's faster. Back in the days of 1.1.x
IBM's had the JIT, Blackdown was faster on _my_ work which was CPU-intensiv
On Tuesday 01 October 2002 05:48 pm, Geyer, Thomas L. wrote:
> Thanks for your speedy response. To answer your question yes, I created the
> filesystems but neglected to format.
That's what I meant by "making the filesystems." :-)
In any case, glad you got the problem solved.
--
---
Hello from Gregg C Levine normally with Jedi Knight Computers but
speaking for myself
I would choose Red Hat. After that? Probably build my own, based on an
available distribution for Intel. Please ask whose. But that's not what
you want to know, sir, it's Red Hat. That's what I'd choose first.
On Tue, 2002-10-01 at 23:10, Rich Smrcina wrote:
> Websphere runs today on SuSE Linux. I have also heard that Lotus Domino will
> be ported to Linux for S/390, there was no mention that it would be
> specifically Redhat. If it was, it would be a grave mistake.
I would agree with that sentiment.
It is like the BSD's, there is a standard, LSB, but will RH and the group
Unitedlinux go along the same road? I think not if I read it correctly,
seems RH thinks they are the standard, same on the United side. It would
be interesting if RH did all the marketing and a group of United whatever
made t
35 matches
Mail list logo
