Greetings; (Posted to VMESA-L and VSE-L and LINUX-390)
- - Now in its sixth year! - - Includes VSE and linux/390!
I have set up a public service web page at
http://www.eskimo.com/~wix/vm/
for posting positions available and wanted for VM, VSE and linux/390.
Please visit the web pag
Hallo list,
I am a experienced in zVM but a novice in LINUX.
We are running zVM in a lpar with 2 real IFLs. The first test machine has 1
virtual processor and seems to run fine. I read the advise to define the same
number of virtual processors as real were available. So I started to define a
L
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 11:01:33 +0100, Leonard Janus
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My question is: Why is the second CPU nearly IDLE ?
> Is there any more setup (on linux) to do ?
Do you have a workload on Linux that allows work to be done on two
CPU's at the same time? If the application does not cr
Hi Daniel,
How right you are!, I just tried it. Very strange that on SLES8 (GNU sed
version 3.02.80) it lacks the "-i" option, but on SLES9 (GNU sed version
4.0.9) it is supported. You would think SUSE would keep SED up to date on
SLES8?
All the Best
Mark Perry
> -Original Message-
> Fro
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 19:49:09 +0100, Mark Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't believe that sed will do an in-place edit. Hence you must pipe the
> output to another file.
Make that *ANOTHER* since trying to use the same file for input and
output most times does not work as you would like. M
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 11:33:14 +0100, Mark Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
> How right you are!, I just tried it. Very strange that on SLES8 (GNU sed
> version 3.02.80) it lacks the "-i" option, but on SLES9 (GNU sed version
> 4.0.9) it is supported. You would think SUSE would keep SED
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 18:30:44 -0600, Rich Smrcina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You could define enough Hipersocket devices so that each Linux machine
> that needs a connection to z/OS can have it's own. (the preferred way,
> no extra routing hop required)
Preferred by some... Upto 5.1.0 owning a
it does it on EVERY system. Fresh install also. So unless every one of my
linux images is corrupted in exactly the same place in the file system, I
wouldn't expect FS corruption to be causing it.
The version we're running is 0.80. Looks like a new build was released
today, actually. clamav 0.81rc
Well I installed the new version .081rc1 - Doesn't seem to have changed the
behaviour. I presume nobody else is getting this error. It only shows up
when trying to run clamscan. When trying to run clamdscan, which uses
clamd, the error does not occur. (which of course makes sense)
Greetings All,
I am in the process of doing an exploration for a proof of concept
project on using Linux on a zSeries box (z900). I am trying to locate
information on which flavor of Linux is best suited for various types of
deployments. I have looked in the archives but cannot seem to
I cannot point you to any specific document but I am currently running
SuSe Linux on and IFL lpars on a Z800 and it is working very good. I
also understand the Redhat works well also.
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/20/05 08:52AM >>>
Greetings All,
I am in the process of doing an exploration for
On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 07:36:51AM +0100, Rob van der Heij wrote:
>
> > Depends on the tooling you have. Usually, you integrate it with your
> > other monitoring tools (sounds like you've already done this to some
> > extent). RSCS with a NJE license is very helpful here, as you can
> > usually use
I have worked with both redhat and suse on this platform and i seem to like
suse better. Suse seems to have betters tools to get the job done in my
opinion. Plus suse has a good backer with novell and ibm.
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Mi
For anyone that cares... if I directly specify the daily.cvd file, clamscan
works. This command, clamscan -r -d /var/lib/clamav/daily.cvd / works, so I
may have a bug or issue to report to the clam AV people.
A
I suspect you have more than one clamav installed and therefore you
might have some strange combination of lib and path.
I'd check the following:
which clamscan# to see where it's executed from
ldd `which clamscan` # to see what libs are accessed
strings `which clamscan` | grep conf # to see
On Thursday, 01/20/2005 at 09:58 EST, David Boyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 07:36:51AM +0100, Rob van der Heij wrote:
> >
> > > Depends on the tooling you have. Usually, you integrate it with your
> > > other monitoring tools (sounds like you've already done this to some
> > > I was going to recommend that, but afaik it requires VTAM
> to feed the
> > > PROP output into automation on z/OS.
> > Nope. RSCS still supports direct physical CTC connections, and PROP
> > still sends things via RSCS messages. The z/OS side gets
> them like any
> > other remote message. No
They almost certainly will not be available for free download. If you
activate the 30-days of support that you get with the free download, you
will be able to get them from the SUSE maintenance portal. If, that is,
they create new .iso files just for this. They don't always do that.
Mark Post
Picking a Linux/390 distribution is going to be very different from site to
site. You need to look at a number of things before deciding. The good
thing is you can get free evaluation copies for them and take a look for
yourself.
Things to consider:
Are you going to be using products that are ce
We are currently running SuSE SLES8-SP3 (31-bit) on our z800 mainframe under
z/VM 5.1.
We have a need to run the IBM Communications Server to replace
soon-to-be-unsupported communication controllers and CIP routers. This is an
ideal solution for us and a perfect use of Linux.
The IBM Manual G
See: http://linuxtoday.com/it_management/2005012001926NWSVSW
"Open source server virtualization got a boost this week with a new release
from the Xen project and a new IBM commitment to help 'harden' it.
"Xen is a virtual machine application that allows users to run multiple
operating s
We seem to be settling on SuSE, more for support than any other reason. If
we choose SuSE and an application we need will only be supported on RedHat,
we will deal with that on a case-by-case basis.
tom
- - - - - - - - - - - -
Toto, I have a feeling we're not in the mainframe world any more.
_
Thanks to all that have blazed the trail of sles9 before me.
I have followed this thread pretty close and have used the installroot
procedure to create an installroot for my CDs. I can start the install,
get into yast, setup the DASD, and then I change my software to Minimal
install. But when the
We're about the same as Tom's group. We went with Red Hat for a year and
then moved over to SuSE for support reasons. For us, because of our current
relationship with Novell, there are annual cost reduction benefits as well
but the move was primarily motivated by support.
Steve
-Original Mess
I kinda went around the README file and found a way to work using ftp and
ssh.
I had to mount cd 1 at /zlinux/cd1
mount cd1 again at /home//zlinux/cd1
then mount cd2 at /home//zlinux/cd2
cd3 etc.
I think it's because the first time it takes the full path that you give
(in my case /zlinux/cd1) an
Verify the checksum of your iso files and make sure they are good.
I have included a "cat mkinstallroot" make sure that the location from where
you mount and copy the CDs is accessible to the script. I used
/ISO_Images_Dir only as an example directory location. Yours will be
different.
Doug
#
Another option is to use SuSE, but contract with IBM for your support. We're
headed that direction, mainly to reduce the number of support agencies we have
to deal with on a regular basis.
--
Robert P. Nix 507-284-0844
Mayo Foundation
200 First St. SW
Rochester, MN 55905
"In
I'm having an interesting issue I'd like to get some opinions on.
I'm working in an environment with SLES-8 (ServicePack 3+) using reiserfs
for / and /var. It's running under z/VM 4.4 (RSU0403). If I shut down a
Linux guest (using SIGNAL SHUTDOWN WITHIN 300 (inittab sets C-A-D to
shutdown -h now
http://www-1.ibm.com/servers/eserver/zseries/os/linux/library/
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htb
We are running a RedHat 7-point-something system with Samba and Apache.
When we are loading files via Samba and someone is looking at (changing?)
the same file with Apache, the kernel crashes. I don't have a copy of the
console available at the moment. I can understand there being a problem,
but br
That functionality was added with the patches in
linux-2.4.21-s390-18-fixed-june2003.tar.gz, dated October 12, 2004. You'll
need a kernel and modules built from source that was updated after that.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf O
Anyone seen this?
http://www.computerworld.com/governmenttopics/government/legalissues/story/0,10801,99098,00.html?source=NLT_PM&nid=99098
Does it have any impact on this case?
__
Ranga Nathan / CSG
Systems Programmer - Specialist; Technical Services;
BAX
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005, Ranga Nathan wrote:
> Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 17:17:49 -0800
> From: Ranga Nathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Linux on 390 Port
> To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: Computerworld says - SCO wins a legal victory
>
> Anyone seen this?
>
>
> http://www.computerworld.com/g
Ranga Nathan wrote:
Anyone seen this?
http://www.computerworld.com/governmenttopics/government/legalissues/story/0,10801,99098,00.html?source=NLT_PM&nid=99098
They won a "discovery order" of sorts... they can get a look at code IBM
did not show them.
Does it have any impact on this case?
Hmm - th
On Thursday 20 January 2005 20:22, Federico Lucifredi wrote:
> Ranga Nathan wrote:
>
> >Anyone seen this?
> >
> >
> >http://www.computerworld.com/governmenttopics/government/legalissues/story/0,10801,99098,00.html?source=NLT_PM&nid=99098
> >
> >
> >
> They won a "discovery order" of sorts... they c
On Jan 20, 2005, at 7:17 PM, Ranga Nathan wrote:
Anyone seen this?
http://www.computerworld.com/governmenttopics/government/legalissues/
story/0,10801,99098,00.html?source=NLT_PM&nid=99098
Does it have any impact on this case?
_
Just another delaying tactic.
Read groklaw; they cover SCO vs. IBM in
36 matches
Mail list logo
