Rick Troth wrote:
Yet as David hinted, the majority of Linux sysadmin talent
is still unfamiliar with admin-for-sharing, and most Linux coders
are still unclued about build-for-sharing. They're used to having
a farm of discrete PCs, like the Windows folk.
and until someone with an intere
>>> On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 3:57 pm, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Thank you for responding.
>
> I ran the mksles9root and then installed SLES9x using NFS. It all worked
> great. SLES9 boots fine and SPident shows:
>
> CONCLUSION: System is up- to- date!
> found
Thank you for responding.
I ran the mksles9root and then installed SLES9x using NFS. It all worked
great. SLES9 boots fine and SPident shows:
CONCLUSION: System is up-to-date!
foundSLES-9-s390x-SP2
All that part worked fine.
The problem is when I go into YaST2 Online Updates, it still gi
I suspect you may have to run the mksles9root for sp2.
Regards,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
NCCI
Boca Raton, Florida
561.893.2415
greetings / avec mes meilleures salutations / Cordialmente
mit freundlichen Grüßen / Med vänlig hälsning
I have created a NFS SLES9x install tree and integrated the SLES9x SP2
CDs. SPident indeed shows that I am at SP2 level.
However, YaST2 Online Updates show all updates as outstanding. How do I
sync YaST2 online updates up with SP2? There are pages and pages of
outstanding online updates. Has anyon
On Jul 25, 2005, at 3:26 PM, Wolfe, Gordon W wrote:
Be careful or I'll send an .mp3 of "it's a small world".
There's no need to, NOW. Thanks. Thanks a bunch.
Adam
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instru
Oh, thanks so much! Now that old Woody Guhrie song is going to be going
through my head all day.
Be careful or I'll send an .mp3 of "it's a small world".
"The Church is near, but the road is icy. The tavern is far, but I will walk
carefully." - old Hungarian Proverb
Gordon W. Wolfe, Ph.D. Boe
>
> A discussion of SIE can be found in the z/VM Security and Integrity
> technical paper,
> http://www.ibm.com/servers/eserver/zseries/library/techpapers/
> pdf/gm130145.pdf.
>
> The SIE instruction has two levels of virtualization: one
> used by PR/SM to
> create partitions, the other by CP to cr
On Jul 25, 2005, at 3:10 PM, Rob van der Heij wrote:
On 7/25/05, Sal Torres/SBC Inc. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The Linux Journal had an article a while back:
http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/7714
That's unionfs - it shares some of the concepts but works on a
different level.
Am I the onl
I have created a NFS SLES9x install tree and integrated the SLES9x SP2
CDs. Does this mean that when I install SLES9X, it will be at SP2 level or
is there something else I need to do?
Also, when I go into YAST2 online updates, will it reflect all the SP2
updates so they do not show up in the selec
On 7/25/05, Sal Torres/SBC Inc. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Linux Journal had an article a while back:
>
> http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/7714
That's unionfs - it shares some of the concepts but works on a different level.
--
Rob van der Heij rvdheij @ gmail.com
--
*** Reply to note of Mon, 25 Jul 2005 13:17:06 -0500 (EST/CDT)
*** by LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
The Linux Journal had an article a while back:
http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/7714
For example, if you hava a readonly directory called /ro/etc, that has
two files, inittab and fstab:
/ro/et
On 7/25/05, James Melin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What, pray tell, is union mount?
Well, for Linux union mount is not there. Other systems (e.g. FreeBSD)
have this mechanism where you mount multiple devices on the same mount
point in some 'transparent' fashion where you're still able to see
th
On Monday, 07/25/2005 at 01:17 EST, James Melin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What, pray tell, is union mount?
The ability to mount two file systems at the same mount point. You mount
a r/w filesystem on top of a r/o file system. If you write to a file, it
is redirected to the r/w filesystem. Re
What, pray tell, is union mount?
Alan Altmark
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ibm.com> To
Sent by: Linux on LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
390 Port
On Monday, 07/25/2005 at 07:00 ZE2, Rob van der Heij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> And you're right, the potential savings with sharing binaries in DCSS
> are larger (and probably harder to manage from a software management
> point of view). The kernel in NSS and binaries in DCSS are independent
> i
THANK YOU
My apologies - I was under the incorrect impression that YAST did that for
you.
Peter.
John Schnitzler
Jr
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] To
com> LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
On Monday, 07/25/2005 at 07:11 ZE2, Ivan Warren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> What really makes the whole thing powerful with z/Architecture is the
SIE
> feature (Interpretative Exection).. Actually, this feature dates back
from
> the S/370 XA era.
>
> This is basically VM in a single instruction (
Peter,
Make sure your run mkinitrd and zipl after exiting yast, and before you
reboot.
Regards,
John
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO
>
> While CPU is not a zSeries strength,
> context switching *is* a strength, or seems to be.
> The insertion loss when putting z/VM between the hardware
> and the workload OS is very small compared to that for VMware.
> I always blame the INTeL chip more than VMware (inc, now EMC).
>
I'd like
On 7/25/05, Joerg Reuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Quite frankly, in my opinion you really don't gain that much from this
> feature (unless you have a great amount of almost identical guests, all
> of them running the same kernel) and upgrading the kernel probably
> becomes an administrative ni
What does "The link between the console and the processing unit is not
connected" mean on the MP3000 Support Element and how do you fix it?
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL P
There are certainly a number of ISV and other service vendors
who are looking at (or already employing!) z/VM to host
multiple Linuxen, one or more for each customer.
> Once again, lots of variables. Feel free to comment on
> *what* variables are the key ones to control (and in what wa
I have successfully installed SUSE 9 SP2 on a 2G LUN - the swap is on VDISK
(using SWAPGEN5).
At this point all is OK.
I am now trying to add a partition (sdb1) on a 8G LUN.
Using YAST I can successfully add the ZFCP device, add the partition and
provide a load point.
Once I exit YAST I can issue
Assuming you have a 3390 (or something that looks like a 3390) then you get 12
4K blocks on a track, and 15 tracks on a cylinder. That adds up to 720K on a
cylinder (12 * 4 * 15 = 720).
Note that there is some overhead for inodes and such, and you probably don't
want to fill a HFS or ZFS datas
Let's change the question somewhat: what workloads do *you* propose
to run
in the environment? That'd probably give us a better idea of what
you're
trying to do and how it will scale. Are we talking about WWW
hosting, or
application hosting, or ??? Pick a couple hypothetical scenarios
and let's
gi
Starting with z/VM 510, the new service command can also be used. Examples
are available at:
http://www.vm.ibm.com/service/servstat.html
Kurt Acker
Leonard Janus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: Linux on 390 Port
07/25/2005 11:14 AM
Please respond to
Linux on 390 Port
To
LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Hi there,
in former times you have to look into the CPLOAD MAP , usually on the 493
minidisk.
here you can search to the apar (or ptf-) number i.e. &/ UM31391
With VM 5.1 there is a menu called VMFINFO. You have to select the PPF (maybe
ZVM)
and on a second screen the CPMPONENT (maybe CP).
On
On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 09:02:09PM +0200, Tobias Dörkes wrote:
> Some weeks ago, i tried to implement the "VM shared kernel" using SLES9.
> But without success. So i asked SUSE, but SuSE does not support the "VM
> shared kernel" !!!
Well, there are no support services from SUSE for this kernel fe
29 matches
Mail list logo
