Hello!
I understand the idea behind asymmetrical routing, (Thank you Harold!), but
for the folks who are rather new to the ideas behind how Linux does his
routing, would one of you carefully reiterate the whole concept?
Oh and while I am at it, Zach, would you explain what prompted your
suggestion
I've done some further reading on the topic of asymmetrical routing,
and I'm wondering if I should set up two routing tables (one for each
interface). Any suggestions?
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instruct
> REXEC -l vanbredt -p kaliannr 172.19.208.10 batch /hwwd/clbsc.sh
> READY
Side note (not the cause of this problem): DNS is important if you're
going to use the REXEC server and client. IP addresses change frequently
and what little security there is in the r-commands is based on IP
address or
My RHEL distribution doesn't have ncurses-32bit. I can only find x86
rpms on the web.
Betsie
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Marcy Cortes
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2007 9:45 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: NetBackup question
>>> On Tue, Aug 7, 2007 at 4:01 PM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Britz, Anton
- CO 7th" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Ok.. My users are trying to execute a "Remote Script" to load the MySQl
> tables as follows :
>
> READY
Hi,
Ok.. My users are trying to execute a "Remote Script" to load the MySQl
tables as follows :
READY
REXEC -l vanbredt -p kaliannr 172.19.208.10 batch /hwwd/clbsc.sh
READY
Just to affirm that this is the (a?) proper direction, we have a set of
filesystems built on 3390 DASD that is just over 600 gigabytes. Originally,
it was built entirely with 3390 mod 3 disks, but is now on mod 27.
The other nice thing about LVM is that you can add a new disk, and mark an
old one
Mark,
Thanks for the response - we were able to add a directory opt/something
and get by! We don't have anything like LVM set up yet but if we
proceed with this project, sounds like we should do something like that.
I'm sure you'll be hearing more questions from us in the future :)
Val Phillips
>>> On Tue, Aug 7, 2007 at 1:52 PM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Phillips.Val" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello, all, we're testing Novell SLES9 SP3 under VM 5.3.
>
> We have a real shortage of disk space in our test system and the guy
> installing the app has run out of space. He wants
LVM would be the way to go if this system continues to grow. But if you
just need a quick and dirty. Add the new disk as a mountpoint within /opt
eg. /opt/IBM
--
Mark Pace
Mainline Information Systems
--
For LINUX-390 subscri
Did you use LVM to design the system for future expansion? Or, did you just
build a filesystem for /opt on its own 3390, without the benefit of
something like LVM?
The ideal situation for fixed / limited size disks (IMHO) is to use LVM and
create a volume group, for the single mount or for a set o
Hello, all, we're testing Novell SLES9 SP3 under VM 5.3.
We have a real shortage of disk space in our test system and the guy
installing the app has run out of space. He wants to increase the size
of his /opt directory. I can give him another 3390 mod3, but I don't
know how to ADD it to his cu
Hello Betsie,
I see now that Veritas is Symantec (makers of ESM). I wonder how that
bodes for our Netbackups and ESM agents ?!
I don't have RHEL, but SuSe, but I have that level (2.4.21 6.0).
It says
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/openv/netbackup/bin> file bp
bp: ELF 32-bit MSB executable, IBM S/390,
>>> On Tue, Aug 7, 2007 at 2:30 AM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Lee Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-snip-
> However the new ISOs included the updated SP3 CDs (...-CD1a.iso etc.).
> And they did kick out a little more info, though not much help... On
> the Putty session I now also see:
>
Hi,
Is anyone running a NetBackup client on RHEL AS 4? What version,
please? Is the bp executable a 64-bit or 32-bit executable?
I installed NetBackup-IBzSeriesLinux2.4.21 6.0.When trying to run
/usr/openv/netbackup/bin/bp, I get an error message that a shared
library could not be loaded.
I have had loads of trouble on my laptop with talking through my
WPA-protected wireless router at home. WEP worked fine, but WPA has
been a royal pain. I finally got it running using a couple of
wpa-supplicant commands, but it still drops out frequently. I can boot
the same laptop on XP and all
>>> On Tue, Aug 7, 2007 at 6:24 AM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Harold
Grovesteen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Whatever happened to the discussion of a CMS based install?
The discussion wasn't about that, exactly, rather a DDR-based restore of a
pre-built installation server. It may see th
>>> On Tue, Aug 7, 2007 at 5:08 AM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Rob van der Heij
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-snip-
> and central upgrade of software.
You're going to have to explain that one a little. I don't know what you mean.
Mark Post
-
>>> On Tue, Aug 7, 2007 at 2:44 AM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jorge Souto
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You won't like this, but "I think" bacula isn't "Novell supported" on SLES
> 10 SP1 (SLES 9 SP3 and SLES10)
No, it's not, but it's going to be in SUSE Linux 10.3, and I've already put i
> Three interfaces? You only talked about OSAs previously.
eth0, eth1, and dummy0.
> What interface the packets leave on isn't the issue. It's that the system is
> receiving packets on an interface that it wouldn't expect them to be arriving
> on. Packets for the IP address of eth1 arriving
> -Original Message-
> From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of David Boyes
> Sent: Monday, August 06, 2007 8:49 PM
> To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: Re: tape backups
>
>
> > I prefer NFS but we don't have it installed. I suppose it's no-cost,
> and
> > com
Whatever happened to the discussion of a CMS based install?
Harold Grovesteen
Mark Post wrote:
Now that SP1 for SLES10 is out, planning efforts are turning to SLE[SD]11. If
you have anything you'd like to see added, removed, or improved for the
mainframe version, please send me an email _of
Comments below.
Mark Post wrote:
On Mon, Aug 6, 2007 at 4:08 PM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, zach pratT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have been receiving some martian source messages in
/var/log/messages as I have been working on our SLES 10 system's
network configuration, and I am at
On 8/6/07, Mark Pace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Smaller, smaller, smaller, base install. Some of the default stuff that
> gets installed is way beyond what a normal person would consider a basic
> (mainframe) install.
This probably should also hold for the default services that get started.
On 8/6/07, Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Today there are very few laptops on the market, the rest is
> configuration and packaging. Its Intel mobile + MICH + intel video +
> intel wireless (aka "Centrino"), Intel mobile + MICH + intel video + other
> wireless, AMD + ATI + broadcom and a fe
25 matches
Mail list logo
