Just a few questions.
Should I be using ANSI or IBM Tape Labels. Which is preferable?
Should all the Tapes be labeled with VM and them and them added to
Bacula. Ie not labeled with Bacula.
Do you them update the changer list?
The other problem I have is that RAWBACIF cannot find
Another good part of the z10 announcement:
quote
HMC version 2.10.0 along with SE version 2.10.0 on System z10 EC will
now provide the ability to install Linux on System z in a z/VM virtual
machine using the Hardware Management Console (HMC) DVD drive. This new
function does not require a network
Hi,
It's no longer a rumor. Here's some web sites for your
reading pleasure
IBM System z10 announcement web site:
http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/z/news/announcement/20080226_annc.html
US Announcement Letter:
Has anyone been able to successfully recover a SLES 10 SP1 server using
FCP devices in a disaster recovery scenario? Recently, I attempted to do
so and the server failed to boot (either in normal or fail safe modes)
because the FCP devices that are normally attached to the server at my
home site
Did you resolved this issue? I have just fighted with initramfs-tools in
Debian. It seems to be that you have no valid device on virtual address
0150. Or maybe you have not valid device up scripts in initramdisk. That
mechanizm is some strange :-). While you are in (initramfs) prompt -
check what
And there are some manuals on IBM's ResourceLink. But not a new
Principles of Operation [rats}
https://www-01.ibm.com/servers/resourcelink/hom03010.nsf?OpenDatabase
Oh, requires a logon from IBM, usually only for customers.
--
John McKown
Senior Systems Programmer
HealthMarkets
Keeping the
PoPs tends to follow about 90 days after GA.
On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 10:10 -0600, McKown, John wrote:
And there are some manuals on IBM's ResourceLink. But not a new
Principles of Operation [rats]
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe /
Hi!
I'm using the redbook Security on z/VM to try to use RACF as authorize
logon to z/Linux.
Now following the redbook carefully, I'm stock in Chapter 3 z/VM LDAP
server bullet 12 Verify LDAPADM2 is able to use native authentication:
I've added user linux2 to RACF:
rac adduser linux2
We've recovered SLES 10 SP1 under z/VM 5.2 in a disaster recovery
scenario using FCP. We use a rescue system, either sles 9 or sles 10, to
fix the ailing sles 10's files and make it bootable.
As you're aware, you need a way to edit the files that reference the
old WWPNs. One way to get an ssh
Should I be using ANSI or IBM Tape Labels. Which is preferable?
In an IBM environment, both work, but IBM SL tapes will be more
friendly to the other systems sharing your ATL.
Should all the Tapes be labeled with VM and them and them added to
Bacula. Ie not labeled with Bacula.
You use the
We've recovered SLES 10 SP1 under z/VM 5.2 in a disaster recovery
scenario using FCP. We use a rescue system, either sles 9 or sles 10,
to
fix the ailing sles 10's files and make it bootable.
As you're aware, you need a way to edit the files that reference the
old WWPNs. One way to get an
I posted a few weeks ago and Mark tried to help.
I'm pretty sure our contracts stuff is straighted out on novell.com now
- I can now pull stuff as described here in testing your id:
http://www.novell.com/support/search.do?cmd=displayKCdocType=kcexterna
lId=10099959
But when I run online_update
No, we haven't figured it out yet. Results of commands sent to Piotr via
personal email. If I should post them here, please let me know.
Regards,
DJ Foreman
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED](imapd)
Sent: Tuesday, February
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 1:23 PM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Marcy
Cortes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I posted a few weeks ago and Mark tried to help.
I'm pretty sure our contracts stuff is straighted out on novell.com now
- I can now pull stuff as described here in testing your id:
Yep, it's all up to date. Spident -vvv gives me all +'s except for
net-snmp from Velocity.
Marcy Cortes
This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If
you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the
addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose, or take
what he would be sudoers? how I use?
Thank you.
Diego Gimenez
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
I would like to know if someone has any experience using the barrier
option while mounting in EXT3 under Linux for z/Series (z/Linux). It
should better overall performance on the discs, but does it compromise
integrity? Has anyone got any info on this?
Felipe Bannwart Perina
IBM - Server Systems
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Diego Sales Gimenez
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 1:17 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Sudoers
what he would be sudoers? how I use?
Thank you.
Diego Gimenez
The sudo command allows
Thank You John.
McKown, John [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: Linux on 390 Port LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
26/02/2008 16:32
Please respond to
Linux on 390 Port LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
To
LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: Sudoers
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port
I would like to know if someone has any experience using the barrier
option while mounting in EXT3 under Linux for z/Series (z/Linux). It
should better overall performance on the discs, but does it compromise
integrity? Has anyone got any info on this?
Felipe Bannwart Perina
One caveat you can execute commands as root BUT you
are not root.
I found this out after knocking my head against the
wall
--- McKown, John [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Diego Sales Gimenez
Sent:
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of LJ Mace
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 1:41 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Sudoers
One caveat you can execute commands as root BUT you
are not root.
I found this out after
Just read this in: System z10 Enterprise Class, System Overview,
SA22-1084-00
quote
Program directed re-IPL is designed to allow Linux on System z10 EC to
re-IPL without operator intervention. Linux can identify how it was
IPL'd from the load device. Program directed re-IPL uses LIC to request
a
IBM Announces System z10 servers
26 Feb 2008: The System z10 Enterprise Class (TM) (z10(TM) EC) is a
world-class enterprise server designed to meet your business needs. The
z10 EC is built on the inherent strengths of the IBM System z (TM)
platform and is designed to deliver new technologies
And also your PATH remains intact, you do not inherit root's PATH. So
things may not quite as expected.
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 3:04 PM, McKown, John [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of LJ Mace
Sent: Tuesday,
Best regards,
Pieter Harder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel +31-73-6837133 / +31-6-47272537
Heiko Carstens [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/24/08 10:39
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 02:27:22PM +0100, Pieter Harder wrote:
Hi list,
I am looking for a place where I can see the active cmma setting. I can't
find it
When setting up the IP address for a hipersocket I am curious as to if people
are giving it the same IP address as with the regular outside of the mainframe
(OSA or whatever) IP address. We have TCP/IP stacks with hipersockets running
on VSE, Linux and z/OS. On some of the VSE stacks we use
When I set up my hipersocket network between two z/VM LPARs, I went to
the networking people and got a 10.x.y.0-255 segment for my own use.
They promised not to let anyone else use it in the rest of the network.
/Tom Kern
Frank Swarbrick wrote:
When setting up the IP address for a hipersocket
The hipersocket network devices should be on a separate subnet from the
rest of your network devices. The hipersocket network is a private
network and it needs to be treated as such.
Also, different hipersocket CHPIDs require different subnets since they
represent different network segments.
McKown, John wrote:
Very good point! I ran into this trying something like:
sudo secure-command /output.file
Well, that didn't work because the redirection to /output.file happens
as myself, not root.
Well.. of course..
Although it has nothing to do with sudo.. I mean, it's not sudo's
Mark Pace wrote:
And also your PATH remains intact, you do not inherit root's PATH. So
things may not quite as expected.
IIRC, sudo -i will let you do that (only, this is basically the same
as su only you have to give your own password, not the target user's
password)
--Ivan
31 matches
Mail list logo
