Rob wrote:
Some of you have heard me present about the need for idle Linux
servers drop from queue. When idle servers don't drop from queue they
continue to consume memory real memory resources. I have explained at
many occasions that some applications in Linux prevent the virtual
machine
On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 11:46:58AM -0500, Sam Bass wrote:
It is zfcp.
No we do not have NPIV turn on since we just upgraded the SVCs this week
(and the old one did not support NPIV (IBM 2145 firmware v3) and the new
SVCs are loaded with latest V4.
Whether NPIV can be used does not depend on
Hi,
I have a SLES11 image installed and up to date with security patches.
It has been live for just over a week. Reboots have taken place due to
implement security updates, fixes, etc with no problem.
Just today, it was rebooted to verify that services required on boot
would come up. It has now
I may have some interest in zLinux around here. The usual caveat of
ABSOLUTLY NO MONEY to spend on POC is in place. I've some room on the
z9BC-LO3. Just four z/OS lpars and using less than 50% capacity in
normal times.
I understand that it's all easier with z/VM, but I, see above under
Gibney, Dave wrote:
I may have some interest in zLinux around here. The usual caveat of
ABSOLUTLY NO MONEY to spend on POC is in place. I've some room on the
z9BC-LO3. Just four z/OS lpars and using less than 50% capacity in
normal times.
I understand that it's all easier with z/VM, but I,
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:linux-...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Rich Smrcina
Sent: Monday, May 11, 2009 4:50 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: In an LPAR once again?
Gibney, Dave wrote:
I may have some interest in zLinux around here. The
Gibney, Dave wrote:
Well, ok. Assuming I could get a trial :) Would I gain anything by
starting zLinux experiments with zVM fully expecting the need to drop
the zVM and run in Lpar(s) for some period of time. At least until the
next biennial budget cycle?
I'm sure there are an infinite
