On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 6:16 AM, Alan Altmark alan_altm...@us.ibm.com wrote:
On Monday, 12/07/2009 at 10:47 EST, Shane Ginnane sginn...@isi.com.au
wrote:
Hands up all those using vdisk for swap ...
Set up a minidisk for another swap partition at a lower priority and
specify it on resume= so
On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 03:01:43PM +0200, Offer Baruch wrote:
I am using redhat v5.2.
my zfcp definitions are at /etc/zfcp.conf (just another text config file
with the WWPNs in it).
but i think that this file is read very early in the boot process. when? i
don't know.
I would like to change
There is some chatter (I am ignorant of the details) about z/VM high
availability clusters. I am not sure how they work.
My understanding is that the Z/VM folks are trying to catch up with the concept
of a parallel sysplex.
snip
John Summerfield wrote:
Presumably if you're updating the
That is exaclty what i was looking for!
Can't thank you enough...
Offer Baruch
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Christof Schmitt
christof.schm...@de.ibm.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 03:01:43PM +0200, Offer Baruch wrote:
I am using redhat v5.2.
my zfcp definitions are at
On Tuesday, 12/08/2009 at 05:28 EST, Rob van der Heij
rvdh...@velocitysoftware.com wrote:
But the swap space already in use by the time you suspend must also be
retained. You could address that by swapoff -a before you suspend
but the ride gets more bumpy.
True, but for the purpose of
On Tuesday, 12/08/2009 at 08:46 EST, Staller, Allan
allan.stal...@kbm1.com wrote:
There is some chatter (I am ignorant of the details) about z/VM high
availability clusters. I am not sure how they work.
My understanding is that the Z/VM folks are trying to catch up with the
concept
of a
On 12/8/09 8:44 AM, Staller, Allan allan.stal...@kbm1.com wrote:
There is some chatter (I am ignorant of the details) about z/VM high
availability clusters. I am not sure how they work.
My understanding is that the Z/VM folks are trying to catch up with the
concept of a parallel sysplex.
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 2:55 PM, Alan Altmark alan_altm...@us.ibm.com wrote:
On Tuesday, 12/08/2009 at 05:28 EST, Rob van der Heij
rvdh...@velocitysoftware.com wrote:
But the swap space already in use by the time you suspend must also be
retained. You could address that by swapoff -a before
On 12/8/09 9:54 AM, Rob van der Heij rvdh...@gmail.com wrote:
Oh, but if you don't plan to move your frozen penguins, then freeze
them into VDISK and let VM page out those VDISK pages when it makes
sense. Just hope the ice water does not cause SWAPGEN to wipe out the
VDISK (but the same
I was curious if anyone had any experience with running VERITAS
NetBackup (specifically 6.5.4) for Linux on System z (SLES10)? We've
noticed extremely high amounts of memory usage when VERITAS is running a
full back up of a server; end result is swapping to disk.
Scenario prior to full back
And it will only be for Linux guests, as well.CMS-based guests will
not be able to be moved between systems.
On 12/08/2009 08:52 AM, David Boyes wrote:
On 12/8/09 8:44 AM, Staller, Allanallan.stal...@kbm1.com wrote:
There is some chatter (I am ignorant of the details) about z/VM high
This is the information I have so far:
BL Server - no way, no how for Z
BL Client - The 7.5 client works for SLES up to 10 SP 2 (verified) and
reportedly SLES 10 SP3 works as well. The Agent WILL NOT WORK for SLES 11 (any
flavor). We are waiting for word from BMC as to what release will support
Not sure if the attachment will get through, but this is the support matrix as
of 8-14-09.
George Shedlock Jr
AEGON Information Technology
AEGON USA
502-560-3541
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:linux-...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Steve Carl
Sent: Friday, December
On Wed, December 9, 2009 06:08, Rodery, Floyd A Mr CIV US DISA CDB12 wrote:
I was curious if anyone had any experience with running VERITAS
NetBackup (specifically 6.5.4) for Linux on System z (SLES10)? We've
noticed extremely high amounts of memory usage when VERITAS is running a
full back
On Tuesday, 12/08/2009 at 12:14 EST, Dave Jones d...@vsoft-software.com
wrote:
And it will only be for Linux guests, as well.CMS-based guests will
not be able to be moved between systems.
You will be able to relocate any guest that doesn't hit any of the
tripwires. But as it works out, CMS
Since VDISKs is z/VM are implemented as FBA devices, it is not difficult
to write an app that can backup the contents of a Linux swap disk to a
CMS file and restore it back to a VDISK. Once in a CMS file, the swap
disk can be moved around to other user ids, sent across the Net, etc.
without much
I am out of the office until 10/12/2009.
I am currently out of the office on annual leave.
If it is urgent then please contact Rachel Hill for all ITS Server Managed
Services or Steve Lee of the ITS SDCoE for related matters.
Note: This is an automated response to your message Re: BMC
17 matches
Mail list logo
