Interesting it works for you, our setup is:
NICDEF 0700 TYPE QDIO DEV 3 LAN SYSTEM VSW1
NICDEF 0710 TYPE QDIO DEV 3 LAN SYSTEM VSW1
zlin0068:~ # ifconfig -a
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 02:03:00:00:00:22
inet addr:131.97.122.248 Bcast:131.97.122.255 Mask:255.255.255.128
Mark Post wrote:
On 8/24/2010 at 03:15 PM, Graves, Aaron aaron.gra...@citi.com wrote:
How about a z/VM zLinux response to this?
http://www.computerworld.com/pdfs/RedHat_Enterprise_Linux_has_Best_TCO.pdf
If I were to say what I really think about this, I would most likely be
perceived as
On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 11:00 -0400, Richard Troth wrote:
As others have said, ReiserFS wants to replay the journal. EXT3 does
too. (Not sure about EXT4.) So for RO I recommend EXT2.
Whilst I'm prepared to believe anything of reiserfs (not having
attempted to use it since before it was named
Difference is that ext3 is prepared to fall back to ext2 functionality when
being read from a read-only device - which makes perfect sense, given that
the journal's purpose is to protect the integrity of writes and (as Mark
pointed out) it is of no value on a disk which will never again be written
The implication is that these represent the leading edge of virtualization,
completely ignoring z/VM's capabilities. This happens time after time,
conference after conference and webcast after webcast. It's almost like z/VM
with zLinux exists in some parallel universe that is outside the
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:linux-...@vm.marist.edu] On
Behalf Of Graves, Aaron
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 7:53 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Virtualization with the Best TCO?
The implication is that these represent the leading edge of
It is is not Intel, then it does not exist. How many Linux people (general
population) consider Linux on the z, i, or p? Unless you came up in the z, i,
or p world, those processors simply do not exist. computer is identically
equal to Intel processor.
Then why are you talking about Linux? You
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:linux-...@vm.marist.edu] On
Behalf Of Harder, Pieter
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 8:08 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Virtualization with the Best TCO?
It is is not Intel, then it does not exist. How many Linux
Why don't we all from now on always mentioned zLinux in one way
or another (depending on subject, situation) when we post comments
at various sites, fa ce book, my sp ace, email, you name it.
All of us here cover the world you know !
Why not spread some z info as a balance to all the x86 info.
Or
Pushy is used in the proper context. However, it may not be the
Kings English (no slight intended).
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:linux-...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Agblad Tore
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 9:27 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re:
Isn't the real problem that the VMWare vendor(s) does a LOT of
advertising and marketing, and the z/VM vendor does not (other than
preaching to the choir)?
Graves, Aaron wrote:
The implication is that these represent the leading edge of
virtualization, completely ignoring z/VM's capabilities.
It may be that there is more revenue to be made from that platform.
Selling subscription/support on a per IFL basis is not as lucrative as
targeting the mass xSeries market.
One can assume that they are in business to make money. The non-zSeries
markets are the easiest way to achieve this.
12 matches
Mail list logo
