Hi Mark,
I know that HyperPAV is only possible in SLES11. I'm trying to get the
'old' PAV to work. HyperPAV should be backwards compatible according to
the IBM manuals.
dm_multipath is loaded and I ran "/etc/init.d/multipathd start". What did
I forget?
Best regards,
Samir Reddahi
From: Ma
Hello lists,
We are pleased to announce the IBM Redbook "z/VM and Linux on IBM System
z: The Virtualization Cookbook for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.0" is
*finally* published (lawyer+lawyer=slow:)) at
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/abstracts/sg247932.html
Thanks goes out to Sue Baloga, Bill Bitner
On Sun, 20 Feb 2011 23:19:04 -0500 (EST), Mark Gillis wrote:
>
> I'm writing an application that communicates between z/OS (1.12) and
> z/Linux (SuSE SLES11) using an SSL connection. On the z/OS (client)
> side, I'm using the System SSL API and on the z/Linux (server) side I'm
> using OpenSSL. I'm
I'm beginning to like this guy's articles.
http://www.infoworld.com/t/unix/when-in-doubt-reboot-not-unix-boxes-061
John McKown
Systems Engineer IV
IT
Administrative Services Group
HealthMarkets(r)
9151 Boulevard 26 * N. Richland Hills * TX 76010
(817) 255-3225 phone *
john.mck...@healthmarkets
Of course - even the CP TRACE said "FIXED DIVIDE". I was sent off on the wrong
track by the fact that I'd received a signal 8 which is described in signum.h
as "Floating-point exception (ANSI)" - I guess they just lump all arithmetic
errors under that.
-Original Message-
From: Linux on
Actually, I was originally using the very same certificate and getting
this problem. I'll contact SuSE.
Thanks,
Mark Gillis.
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
Alan Altmark
Sent: Monday, 21 February 2011 3:48 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST
Hi...We've got a customer that runs their hardware clock on local
time, and just installed RedHat 5.5. I think I remember seeing this
before where RH doesn't speak local clock time on Z and we had to play
games to get the time right. But I'll be darned if I can remember what
we did.Any
>>> On 2/21/2011 at 04:51 PM, Lee Stewart
>>> wrote:
> Hi...We've got a customer that runs their hardware clock on local
> time, and just installed RedHat 5.5. I think I remember seeing this
> before where RH doesn't speak local clock time on Z and we had to play
> games to get the time ri
Are you talking about the UTC setting? You can select whether UTC is used
or not at install..from a blurb on the web for RHEL5:
To change your time zone configuration after you have completed the
installation, use the *Time and Date Properties Tool* .
Type the system-config-date command in a
>>> On 2/21/2011 at 03:40 AM, Samir Reddahi wrote:
> I know that HyperPAV is only possible in SLES11. I'm trying to get the
> 'old' PAV to work. HyperPAV should be backwards compatible according to
> the IBM manuals.
I've never been in a position to test that (certainly not with SP2) so I can't
Yes, but if you select that the system/hardware clock is on LOCAL time,
(install time or later) RH seems to ignore that still uses the timezone
offset for whatever timezone you specified.
Lee
On 2/21/2011 3:09 PM, Scott Rohling wrote:
Are you talking about the UTC setting? You can select wheth
We're going to be upgrading to SLES11 and we have the desire to
standardize all of our file systems layouts. We did start out with a
standard, but that has evolved over the years and it's now pretty
stable, so we figure we might as well take the opportunity...
Up til now we've used Reiser and wo
>>> On 2/22/2011 at 01:42 AM, Leland Lucius wrote:
> Up til now we've used Reiser and would convert to ext3 as part of the
> rebuilds. But, should we leave all of this until the next upgrade?
> Will the next recommendation be btrfs or ext4? Will they still be too
> "new" to bet the house on?
I
On Mon, 21 Feb 2011 23:54:53 -0700
Mark Post wrote:
> >>> On 2/22/2011 at 01:42 AM, Leland Lucius
> >>> wrote:
> > Up til now we've used Reiser and would convert to ext3 as part of
> > the rebuilds. But, should we leave all of this until the next
> > upgrade? Will the next recommendation be btr
14 matches
Mail list logo
