What a hassle!
I tested some today, and found that indeed, it takes some time before
changes are seen on the R/O disk. But if I do a sync after my database
backup (on the RW linux), then umount/mount pm the RO,
the changes are immediately visible. Why should I have to do a
detach/attach?
I was working with SMT and everything seem to be working and now, all of a
sudden I am seeing the following:
Mirroring: https://nu.novell.com/repo/$RCE/SLES11-SP1-Pool/sle-11-s390x/
Target:/srv/www/htdocs/repo/$RCE/SLES11-SP1-Pool/sle-11-s390x
E
On 10/14/11 11:28 AM, Roger Evans ro...@autodata.no wrote:
What a hassle!
I tested some today, and found that indeed, it takes some time before
changes are seen on the R/O disk. But if I do a sync after my database
backup (on the RW linux), then umount/mount pm the RO,
the changes are
Did you recently patch perl-libwww-perl?
Marcy
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:LINUX-390@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Peter E.
Abresch Jr. - at Pepco
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2011 11:52 AM
To: LINUX-390@vm.marist.edu
Subject: [LINUX-390] 500 Internal Server Error
No, I was just doing some testing and doing some minor tweaks and now I
the 500 message. I do not know if I did something or there is an issue
with Novell.
Peter
From: Marcy Cortes marcy.d.cor...@wellsfargo.com
To: LINUX-390@vm.marist.edu
Date: 10/14/2011 03:10 PM
Subject:Re:
On 10/14/2011 at 02:51 PM, Peter E. Abresch Jr. - at Pepco
peabre...@pepco.com wrote:
Is the 500 Internal Server Error on my end or Novell?s end?
Looks like Novell's end is the problem. I just pointed my web browser to
nu.novell.com, and got this back:
500 Internal Server Error
All LDAP
Thanks, I reported it to Novell, hopefully it will not be too long.
Peter
From: Mark Post mp...@novell.com
To: LINUX-390@vm.marist.edu
Date: 10/14/2011 03:25 PM
Subject:Re: 500 Internal Server Error with smt-mirror
Sent by:Linux on 390 Port LINUX-390@vm.marist.edu
On
Bernie I forgot to thank you!
This did enable the GUI to come up at http://myserver:631
The Lexmark models are not in the drop down so will look into getting
drivers from Lexmark.
I tried just picking 1 in the Lexmark list but test page but I killed a
tree.
-Original Message-
From: Linux
Hello listers,
I was in the process of verifying that the proper patches were installed
on a group of servers that were freshly upgraded from SLES10SP3 to
SLES10SP4. When I went into online update, I noticed several patches
that were classified as security or recommended that were not auto
More information:
When I invoke the graphical version of online update, under the summary
heading,
I see a green checkmark followed by summary information.
Dusting off a few brain cells, I seem to remember this happening
ocassionally for
one or two patches at a time. This system has 27 patches
On 10/14/2011 at 04:29 PM, Ron Foster at Baldor-IS rfos...@baldor.com
wrote:
If I manually select a patch, I get installation finished in the
progress log, but none of the other indiations that a patch is actually
applied (like messages indicating things were being downloaded, or
patches
Mark,
It sounds logical, but the line in the yast update screen implies SP4. For
example,
│slesp4-SPident │Recommended update for SPident
│recommended│7441-0│
Ron
From: Linux on 390 Port [LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf
It looks like Novell has corrected their problem. I finished my SMT
testing and then went to the client. I ran the following script:
./clientSetup4SMT.sh --host linuxsmt.pepcoholdings.biz
And all was looking good until then end when I get the following messages:
All repositories have been
This just has to be disaster waiting to happen - as per the initial
post.
Detach/attach is the only time Linux forces a re-read of the data
actually on the disk for the R/O systems, so you need to sync on the
R/W system, then detach/attach on the R/O systems to pick up the
actual changes.
We are getting ready to move from our old cpu to a new z114. I think
most of my z/Linux guest machines will move to the new equipment without
any problems, but I have one z/Linux machine that was built on zfcp dasd
only, and it has me worried. I can change the world wide information in
the vm
Sue,
I just had the fun of moving 32 linux guests with allocated fcp luns. When
it comes down to it this really depends on what is changing to your
connection to the san switch. The SAN team will have to rezone the luns to
the wwpn's of the new cpu chpid (to the san team this is an HBA). If
16 matches
Mail list logo
