On Friday, 02/20/2015 at 04:32 EST, Carlos Bodra - Pessoal
wrote:
> If I IPL Linux in a z/VM mode partition (as a z/VM guest) with CP and
IFL
> allocated to lpar, where Linux will run???
If the guest has virtual IFLs defined as the primary CPU type then
If CPU affinity is ON then
Guest ru
Alan,
If I IPL Linux in a z/VM mode partition (as a z/VM guest) with CP and IFL
allocated to lpar, where Linux will run???
*Carlos Bodra
IBM Certified zEnterprise
Sao Paulo - SP - BRAZIL*
On 20/02/2015 19:09, Alan Altmark
On Friday, 02/20/2015 at 01:05 EST, Steve P
wrote:
> I have a Suse zLinux on an system z Lpar (not under zVM).
> Are there message(s) or indicators at Linux startup that tells me that
I'm
> running on an IFL processor?
You sound like you don't trust the machine, Steve. :-) Here's how it
works:
Good to know. Thanks!
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Mark Post
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2015 2:40 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: IFL vs Non-IFL processor
>>> On 2/20/2015 at 03:00 PM, Linker Harley - hlinke
>>>
wr
>>> On 2/20/2015 at 03:00 PM, Linker Harley - hlinke
wrote:
> I doubt that they expose the difference between an IFL and a GP (General
> Purpose) engine as an IFL, basically, is a GP engine loaded with different
> microcode (to prevent the engine from being able to run z/OS). It is a full
>
>>> On 2/20/2015 at 03:12 PM, Michael MacIsaac wrote:
> How about QUERY CPUS:
>
> # *vmcp q cpus*
> CPU 00 ID FF0777188000 (BASE)* IFL* CPUAFF ON
Would be a nice trick in an LPAR. ;)
Mark
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe /
I doubt that they expose the difference between an IFL and a GP (General
Purpose) engine as an IFL, basically, is a GP engine loaded with different
microcode (to prevent the engine from being able to run z/OS). It is a full
speed engine where a GP engine can be slowed down, via microcode, to r
How about QUERY CPUS:
# *vmcp q cpus*
CPU 00 ID FF0777188000 (BASE)* IFL* CPUAFF ON
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 2:01 PM, Michael O'Reilly wrote:
>
> Steve,
>
>You might be able to tell with "hyptop" under Linux, from the "man"
> pages, the first line shows:
>
> CPU TYPES
>Dependi
Steve,
You might be able to tell with "hyptop" under Linux, from the "man"
pages, the first line shows:
CPU TYPES
Depending on the hypervisor different CPU types are supported.
These CPU types can be selected either interactively or with the
"--cpu_types" command line option. The ca
>>> On 2/20/2015 at 01:26 PM, Steve P wrote:
> I have installed zVm with zLinux under it on a System z Lpar with IFL
> processors before. I could verify that the IFLs were being used with zvm
> commands.
>
> With this one, I know we have an IFL that has been dedicated to this Lpar.
> I was just
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 12:26 PM, Steve P wrote:
> I have installed zVm with zLinux under it on a System z Lpar with IFL
> processors before. I could verify that the IFLs were being used with zvm
> commands.
>
> With this one, I know we have an IFL that has been dedicated to this Lpar.
> I was j
I have installed zVm with zLinux under it on a System z Lpar with IFL
processors before. I could verify that the IFLs were being used with zvm
commands.
With this one, I know we have an IFL that has been dedicated to this Lpar.
I was just curious if there are messages or commands within the zLinu
>>> On 2/20/2015 at 01:02 PM, Steve P wrote:
> I have a Suse zLinux on an system z Lpar (not under zVM).
> Are there message(s) or indicators at Linux startup that tells me that I'm
> running on an IFL processor?
Not that I'm aware of. I believe the only way to tell is from the HMC. Since
yo
I have a Suse zLinux on an system z Lpar (not under zVM).
Are there message(s) or indicators at Linux startup that tells me that I'm
running on an IFL processor?
Thanks,
Steve
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive acces
>>> On 2/20/2015 at 10:59 AM, Ron Foster wrote:
> Hello listers,
>
> We are still in midst of upgrading our last SLES11SP2 system.
>
> We have made several attempts on this system. We have tried Suse Manager.
> We have tried SMT. We have tried wagon. And we have tried various
> repositorie
Hello listers,
We are still in midst of upgrading our last SLES11SP2 system.
We have made several attempts on this system. We have tried Suse Manager. We
have tried SMT. We have tried wagon. And we have tried various repositories.
SMT and Suse Manager.
We are investigating using the
Hi All,
With SHARE one week away it looks like we have some really great
session left. If you are attending the SHARE conference and see a session you
would like to chair for us please send me an e - mail with the session or
session you would like to chair.
SHARE CHAIR SESSIONS
:-)
-
Filipe Miranda
On Feb 20, 2015, at 7:26 AM, Mark Post wrote:
On 2/19/2015 at 09:27 PM, Alan Ackerman wrote:
>> OK, so what is Docker? What is a "container"? For that matter what is the
>> "go" language? Don't we have enough languages, already?
>
> Get off my lawn!
>
>
> Mark Pos
>>> On 2/19/2015 at 09:27 PM, Alan Ackerman wrote:
> OK, so what is Docker? What is a "container"? For that matter what is the
> "go" language? Don't we have enough languages, already?
Get off my lawn!
Mark Post
--
For LINUX
Victor,
Try "chkconfig boot.lvm on" then a reboot.
HTH.
-Mike
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 8:37 AM, Victor Echavarry Diaz <
vechava...@evertecinc.com> wrote:
> Is strange, we continue the installation with the errors. It finishes and
> after reboot the server it install all without the LVM's.
Is strange, we continue the installation with the errors. It finishes and after
reboot the server it install all without the LVM's. But, when we try to mount
the failing LVM's its mount without any problems. Do anyone of you pass this
before.
BTW, we open an issue with Novell.
Regards,
Victor
21 matches
Mail list logo
