bc12 moved successfully and is back up.
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX
> On Aug 19, 2015, at 11:18 PM, Cohen, Sam wrote:
>
> Gregory,
>
> It is, of course, more art than science. In my case, I've done the following:
>
> My SYSTEM CONFIG file has EQID FCP6000 for addresses 6000 and 6100, EQID
> FCP6001 for addresses 6001 and 6101, etc. The SAN team has zoned the
> On Aug 20, 2015, at 9:23 AM, Alan Altmark wrote:
>
> The constant in this discussion is that FCP subchannels (device numbers)
> with the same EQID are defined to have the same access rights, without
> regard to the chpid. This means they are in the same SAN zone and are
> masked to the sa
Due to system upgrade, Velocity Software and other hosted sites will be
down today. Note these websites all run under z/VM on a BC12, secured
by RACF. Our growth, current projects, and many projected future
projects require a move to a larger space.
We are looking at a large number of interest
On Wednesday, 08/19/2015 at 10:58 EDT, Grzegorz Powiedziuk
wrote:
> I?ve been thinking about this and I am afraid that doing one EQID for
all
> devices on one CHPID will not work for us.
> The point is to predict WWPNs which would be used if machine is being
relocated
> so the storage team can
>>> On 8/20/2015 at 09:11 AM, Michael Weiner wrote:
> Which do you download the ISO?
>
> Does this get installed on vmWARE or System z?
As I stated in my email, the ISO image contains all the SRPMs for the product.
Not needed for installation, but made available as the licensing requires. The
Which do you download the ISO?
Does this get installed on vmWARE or System z?
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 3:59 AM, Christer Solskogen <
christer.solsko...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 11:41 PM, Mark Post wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > I'm glad to (finally) be able to announce that our SUSE
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 11:41 PM, Mark Post wrote:
> All,
>
> I'm glad to (finally) be able to announce that our SUSE Manager product is
> now available for the mainframe.
We've been using this since february. It's working pretty good, but
taskomatic tends to crash (and not able to recover) some
