Great summary Robert and very true. In the case of one shop because z/VM was
costly and a pain to manage, meaning the Linux folks could not easily use it to
provision Linux guests, the project was killed and moved to x86.
With IBM now introducing KVM for z I am hoping this will open the door aga
Hi:
I would like to attend your performance class, I am a software developer
at Innovation Data Processing here in NJ.
Thanks, Ed Gilroy (IDP USA)
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 3:32 PM, Magnelia Necoy
wrote:
> Once again we are offering the famous Performance Class for z/VM and Linux
> on z Syste
The 2016 VMWorkshop is scheduled for June 23-25, 2016,it is being held
at Rutgers University, Busch Campus Center. 604 Bartholomew Rd,
Piscataway Township, NJ 08854.
This years VMWORKSHOP is the 6 since they were reanimated at Ohio State
in 2010.
Please go to VMWORKSHOP.ORG to register.
T
Mark,
My employer has a z13s and we would be happy to test your script.
Eric
On 3/15/16 12:03 PM, Mark Post wrote:
Cross-posted to IBMVM and Linux-390...
Does anyone on the list have a z13s or the new LinuxONE Rockhopper running
Linux that could test an updated cputype script for me? I real
In our case, we had the zVM expertise, and we automated the Linux image
installation down to about 120 seconds between request and log in, and
anyone (with the privilege) could do it in one command. So the whole
expertise issue was removed at that point. Adding disk was mostly a
Dirmaint thing. And
>>> On 3/19/2016 at 09:34 AM, Jake Anderson wrote:
> Hi
>
> Is there any difference running a openstack in Linux running on x86 and
> open stack on zVM ?
As far as the interfaces to the hypervisor(s) go, yes. Other than that, there
shouldn't be. I haven't heard of Red Hat offering their Ope
2016 VMWORKSHOP registration is now open.
The 2016 VMWorkshop is scheduled for June 23-25, 2016,it is being held
at Rutgers University, Busch Campus Center. 604 Bartholomew Rd,
Piscataway Township, NJ 08854.
This years VMWORKSHOP is the 6 since they were reanimated at Ohio
State in 2010.
Ple
On 03/14/2016 11:29 AM, Ambros, Thomas wrote:
> To start to contest the perception that Linux on system Z is a 'one-off',
> where would one find out for themselves roughly how many shops in North
> America are running production implementations of Linux on system Z and what
> proportion of all z
For those who are interested in blockchain, or openledger, or hyperledger
(I can’t keep up with the names) and would like to get their hands dirty;
I’ve created an open chain peer container which will allow you to play
with it. The instructions may be found at:
https://hub.docker.com/r/brunswickhe
The VM Workshop committee is in the process of building the agenda and
soliciting presenters. If anyone has a topic they would like to be considered,
please post it at http://vmworkshop.org/2016sesp.shtml. As the agenda is built
and finalized, it will be posted at http://vmworkshop.org/2016agen.
Hi
Is there any difference running a openstack in Linux running on x86 and
open stack on zVM ?
Jake
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO
³Once it¹s up, linux is linux²Š
Right up until you want to install some piece of software. Unless you have
the source, then linux is x86, or linux is arm, or linux is z.
This is the main issue we ran into in getting acceptance of Linux on z
here, and which ultimately led to its death. Far too man
Great summary, Robert ... I've been involved with z/Linux POC's for well
over 10 years and if they died, it was almost always due to vendor products
not being certified/supported on z (s390). This is what made it a 'one
off' - having to find a different solution for the z platform.IBM has
o
13 matches
Mail list logo
