Re: /tmp as a logical volume

2005-06-27 Thread Post, Mark K
dless of the architecture. Mark Post -Original Message- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thomas Kern Sent: Monday, June 27, 2005 5:45 PM To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: /tmp as a logical volume My thinking was that /tmp on real dasd requires REAL

Re: /tmp as a logical volume

2005-06-27 Thread Thomas Kern
TECTED] On Behalf Of > Thomas Kern > Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 8:50 AM > To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU > Subject: Re: /tmp as a logical volume > > > I was thinking that putting /tmp on a vdisk like we do with swap would > be better than lvm or a se

Re: /tmp as a logical volume

2005-06-27 Thread McKown, John
> -Original Message- > From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Post, Mark K > Sent: Monday, June 27, 2005 10:51 AM > To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU > Subject: Re: /tmp as a logical volume > > > Why is using expanded storage for work fil

Re: /tmp as a logical volume

2005-06-27 Thread Post, Mark K
rom: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thomas Kern Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 8:50 AM To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: /tmp as a logical volume I was thinking that putting /tmp on a vdisk like we do with swap would be better than lvm or a separate minidisk. Wh

Re: /tmp as a logical volume

2005-06-22 Thread Little, Chris
X-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: /tmp as a logical volume I build all my systems with /tmp separate from /. That goes for Linux/390 and Intel Linux. SLES9 will handle it nicely. I'm beginning to have doubts about LVM (version 1 at least) on 64-bit systems. I've had two cases where my vol

Re: /tmp as a logical volume

2005-06-22 Thread Uriel Carrasquilla
HS, the contents of /tmp are > not guaranteed across a reboot anyway. > > > Mark Post > > -Original Message- > From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Uriel > Carrasquilla > Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2005 6:10 PM > To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU > S

Re: /tmp as a logical volume

2005-06-22 Thread Uriel Carrasquilla
VM.MARIST.EDU m> cc: Sent by: Linux on Subject: Re: /tmp as a

Re: /tmp as a logical volume

2005-06-22 Thread Thomas Kern
gt; not guaranteed across a reboot anyway. > > > Mark Post > > -Original Message- > From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Uriel > Carrasquilla > Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2005 6:10 PM > To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU > Subject: /tmp as a logi

Re: /tmp as a logical volume

2005-06-21 Thread Post, Mark K
nts of /tmp are not guaranteed across a reboot anyway. Mark Post -Original Message- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Uriel Carrasquilla Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2005 6:10 PM To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: /tmp as a logical volume We have /tmp as pa

Re: /tmp as a logical volume

2005-06-21 Thread Little, Chris
go for it. you'll be fine. you'll have the same risks as any other mounted filesystem. -Original Message- From: Uriel Carrasquilla [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2005 5:10 PM To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: /tmp as a logical volume We have /tmp

/tmp as a logical volume

2005-06-21 Thread Uriel Carrasquilla
We have /tmp as part of the / (root) file system in one 3390 volume (m9). I was wondering what reaction I would get from this list if I was to create a logical-volume (lvtmp), part of an existing volume-group (vgsys01) and mount it as /tmp. Would SuSE SLES-9 be ok with it? what are my risks if