gone back to the old way using /mnt and /etc/fstab
-- R;
Mark Post <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: Linux on 390 Port
06/27/2007 03:52 PM
Please respond to Linux on 390 Port
From
Mark Post <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To
LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: BaseVol/GuestVol serv
loppy" and "cdrom".
-- R;
Mark Post <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: Linux on 390 Port
06/27/2007 03:52 PM
Please respond to Linux on 390 Port
From
Mark Post <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To
LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: BaseVol/GuestVol server for SLES9
&
Vol/GuestVol server for SLES9
(Sorry this is so late; we wanted to make sure we had something solid
before I responded.)
Michael MacIsaac wrote:
> What are other people using for the layout of their master/golden image?
>
>
Right now, we're testing out the basevol/guestvol setup
(Sorry this is so late; we wanted to make sure we had something solid
before I responded.)
Michael MacIsaac wrote:
What are other people using for the layout of their master/golden image?
Right now, we're testing out the basevol/guestvol setup at
http://www.linuxvm.org/Info/HOWTOs/basevol9.h
>>> On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 4:06 PM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Fargusson.Alan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So does the Filesystem Hierarchy Standard carry an weight? It says that
> /media is the place for automatically mounted devices like floppy and cdrom.
Clearly it does, or distribu
, June 27, 2007 12:53 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: BaseVol/GuestVol server for SLES9
>>> On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 3:33 PM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "McKown,
John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-snip-
> Hum, I guess. Except that /mnt has been around
>>> On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 3:33 PM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "McKown,
John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-snip-
> Hum, I guess. Except that /mnt has been around vaguely forever and
> perhaps the architect was concerned with name collisions of some sort.
> /mnt/media might be a bit better th
Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
McKown, John
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2007 12:34 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: BaseVol/GuestVol server for SLES9
> -Original Message-
> From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Mark Post
> Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2007 2:06 PM
> To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: Re: BaseVol/GuestVol server for SLES9
>
>
> >>> On Wed, Jun 27, 20
>>> On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 2:59 PM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "McKown,
John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-snip-
> Why do you say that /media is worthless? Perhaps it is on System z, but
> it is very nice on Intel where it automounts my USB stick when I plug it
> in.
Any reason why it could
> -Original Message-
> From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Mark Post
> Sent: Friday, June 22, 2007 3:46 PM
> To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: Re: BaseVol/GuestVol server for SLES9
> I don't think you can blame SUSE for that.
Mark Post wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 4:30 PM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Stricklin, Raymond J" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Probably. Generally accepted practice in the Unix world
separates /, /usr, /var, /opt, /home, and /srv (if used) into
distinct filesystems.
I'm going to h
Stricklin, Raymond J wrote:
Probably. Generally accepted practice in the Unix world
separates /, /usr, /var, /opt, /home, and /srv (if used) into
distinct filesystems.
I'm going to have to respectfully disagree.
Making separate filesystems without understanding the _reasons_ for
making thi
;m certain I'll fall into holes
along the way, may end up learning alot after all.
Thanks very much to all for your insights.
susan
--
Date:Mon, 25 Jun 2007 11:52:09 -0400
From:"Edmund R. MacKenty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: BaseVo
On Friday 22 June 2007 16:30, Stricklin, Raymond J replied to :
David Boyes:
>> Probably. Generally accepted practice in the Unix world
>> separates /, /usr, /var, /opt, /home, and /srv (if used) into
>> distinct filesystems.
>
>I'm going to have to respectfully disagree.
>
>Making separate filesys
> > Probably. Generally accepted practice in the Unix world
> > separates /, /usr, /var, /opt, /home, and /srv (if used) into
> > distinct filesystems.
>
> I'm going to have to respectfully disagree.
> Making separate filesystems without understanding the _reasons_ for
> making things separate fil
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject
IST.EDU> Re: BaseVol/GuestVol server for
SLES9
On Jun 22, 2007, at 3:30 PM, Stricklin, Raymond J wrote:
I have never, ever, EVER seen /etc split out, or at least not as
anything other than a joke. Off the top of my head I can think of at
least four different varieties of UNIX which won't even boot if you do
that. Don't do it, it's completely
>>> On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 4:30 PM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Stricklin, Raymond J" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Probably. Generally accepted practice in the Unix world
>> separates /, /usr, /var, /opt, /home, and /srv (if used) into
>> distinct filesystems.
>
> I'm going to have to
> Probably. Generally accepted practice in the Unix world
> separates /, /usr, /var, /opt, /home, and /srv (if used) into
> distinct filesystems.
I'm going to have to respectfully disagree.
Making separate filesystems without understanding the _reasons_ for
making things separate filesystems
>>> On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 8:26 AM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Susan Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-snip-
> Please bear with me (this is still very new to me), but do you put
> your file systems on their own minidisks and then group them together as
> one logical volume? Since the f
> Some shops have used it and are using it, I believe. Some have backed
away
> from it. Are people still using basevol/guestvol?
It's still valuable, but it's more a hack until we can provide something
more sophisticated like unionfs support. Much of what basevol/guestvol
does could be done better
Susan,
> I'd like to save disk storage as well as simplify maintenance so thought
> the concept of a basevol/guestvol penguin colony sounded perfect.
Some shops have used it and are using it, I believe. Some have backed away
from it. Are people still using basevol/guestvol?
> I'm a relative newb
cheme)?
Is there a way to easily determine the amount to allocate to each file
system?
thanks again...
Susan
--
Date:Wed, 20 Jun 2007 16:19:36 -0600
From:Mark Post <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: BaseVol/GuestVol server for SLES9
>>> On Wed, Jun
>>> On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 4:50 PM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Susan Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-snip-
> The only way I've built a Linux system is outlined in the Redbook " z/VM
> and Linux on zSeries: From LPAR to Virtual Servers in Two Days".
> Everything gets installed in / (ro
Hi Listers.
I'd like to save disk storage as well as simplify maintenance so thought
the concept of a basevol/guestvol penguin colony sounded perfect.
I'm a relative newbie, so what might be obvious to most administrators is
lost on me.
I am referencing both the Redbook "Large Scale Linux Deplo
26 matches
Mail list logo
