On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 10:04 AM, Jose Raul Baron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why is it that there's the same problem everywhere ?
> Life would be much easier and problems could be solved faster and better
> with just some more DASD but it seems like the management guys must create
> the dasd
o:[EMAIL PROTECTED] En nombre de Higgins,
Neil S
Enviado el: jueves, 14 de febrero de 2008 18:50
Para: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Asunto: Re: Copying 3390-9 to 3390-3 Linux LVM under z/VM.
Your concerns are VERY valid about DRA recovery.
Maybe another angle would be to advise management about NOT being
: jueves, 14 de febrero de 2008 17:28
Para: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Asunto: Re: Copying 3390-9 to 3390-3 Linux LVM under z/VM.
We don't have any mod 9 available in the z/VM pool, all were re-allocated
to the z/OS Adabas databases. We are trying to get more dasd, but approval
is very slow and pai
consequences being unable to recover
would be.
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Luis La Torre
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 11:28 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Copying 3390-9 to 3390-3 Linux LVM under z/VM.
We don't have an
What kind of dasd do you have?
As you said you have snapshot, you probably have some type of raid box that
emulates 3390 dasd. If
you do then just change some mod 3 to mod 9. Their is no cost in making that
change. Just be sure
that you have enough backing storage for the new disks.
Luis La To
We don't have any mod 9 available in the z/VM pool, all were re-allocated
to the z/OS Adabas databases. We are trying to get more dasd, but approval
is very slow and painful and management does not want to spend any money
at all.
I just want to thank everyone for their response, You people prov
Edmund R. MacKenty wrote:
On Wednesday 13 February 2008 11:28, Luis La Torre wrote:
Why?. because we have the z/VM and all Linux guests on 3390-3 volumes. And
for some reason our previous administrator defined the LVM on a 3390-9,
maybe he ran out of 3390-3.
Aha! So your 3390-9's contain a s
Would it not be much less trouble to change the backup volumes to 3390-9?
Luis La Torre wrote:
Why?. because we have the z/VM and all Linux guests on 3390-3 volumes. And
for some reason our previous administrator defined the LVM on a 3390-9,
maybe he ran out of 3390-3.
Anyway our current backu
You could also format the new mod 3's, go ahead and add them to the volume
groups you want them to end up in, and then pvmove the old extents to the
new ones. Once the data is migrated, use pvremove to take the old physical
volumes out of the volume group. You needn't even bring down the
applicatio
On Wednesday 13 February 2008 11:28, Luis La Torre wrote:
>Why?. because we have the z/VM and all Linux guests on 3390-3 volumes. And
>for some reason our previous administrator defined the LVM on a 3390-9,
>maybe he ran out of 3390-3.
Aha! So your 3390-9's contain a set of LVM physical volumes
Why?. because we have the z/VM and all Linux guests on 3390-3 volumes. And
for some reason our previous administrator defined the LVM on a 3390-9,
maybe he ran out of 3390-3.
Anyway our current backup job using FLASHCOPY does not include mixing
device volumes. We do volume dumps using flashcopy a
On Tuesday, 02/12/2008 at 05:38 EST, "Huegel, Thomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I asume by 3 partitions you mean each mod-9 represents 3 mod-3's.. DDR
> should work just fine.
No, not really. Remember that partitions 2 and 3 need an extra cylinder
to allow for a label.
HOWEVER, since we're on
>>> On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 5:06 PM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Luis
La Torre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am looking for any information or ideas on how to copy 7 3390-9 volumes
> splitted into 3 partitions per volume into probably 21 3390-3 volumes. Or
> maybe copy them to tape.
First
>>> On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 5:37 PM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Huegel, Thomas"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I asume by 3 partitions you mean each mod-9 represents 3 mod-3's.. DDR
> should work just fine.
Ah, not really. The partition table is only in one place on the volume, as is
the f
I asume by 3 partitions you mean each mod-9 represents 3 mod-3's.. DDR
should work just fine.
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Luis La Torre
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 4:06 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Copying 3390-9 to 3
Am looking for any information or ideas on how to copy 7 3390-9 volumes
splitted into 3 partitions per volume into probably 21 3390-3 volumes. Or
maybe copy them to tape.
Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance,
Luis La Torre
BAX Global Inc.
Irvine, CA 92602
---
16 matches
Mail list logo
