Duplicate rpm packages s390 - s390x, can one of them be removed?

2011-09-20 Thread CHAPLIN, JAMES (CTR)
We have several Red Hat servers that were set up by our Unix group when we started into the zLinux world. All these servers are running in 64 bit architecture. As I am getting to know they systems better, I did a search on the packages we have installed and found about 71 packages that have both a

Re: Duplicate rpm packages s390 - s390x, can one of them be removed?

2011-09-20 Thread Richard Troth
Check the contents of each package. If the package supplies libraries, then DO NOT remove them because other things may depend on them. If the package supplies commands, you may have difficulty removing. (But re-install of preferred arch may suffice.) In the case of libraries, it is normal to have

Re: Duplicate rpm packages s390 - s390x, can one of them be removed?

2011-09-20 Thread R P Herrold
On Tue, 20 Sep 2011, Richard Troth wrote: In the case of libraries, it is normal to have both architectures installed. Desirable even. So ... again ... check what is supplied, and if they are libs, don't sweat it. Not sure about 'Desirable' actually. If a file is not needed, or useful, it h

Re: Duplicate rpm packages s390 - s390x, can one of them be removed?

2011-09-20 Thread Richard Troth
Good point, Russ, but presumes that legitimate executables will only be under the purview of RPM. That may be the preferred policy, but is not universal. (And questionable if it really agrees with Unix philosophy, but we're drifting into theory ... history ... opinion.) So if a (legitimate) progr