-Original Message-
From: Rick Troth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Is it as user friendly? No.
UNIX is user friendly - it is just very particular who its friends are.
Internet communications are not secure and therefore the Barclays Group
does not accept legal responsibility for
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Alan Cox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 3:28 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: General LINUX Question
On Fri, 2002-09-06 at 17:45, Post, Mark K wrote:
Bruce,
That's a big question. Certainly you're unlikely to find
Didn't know that, thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Jim Elliott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 4:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: General LINUX Question
Bruce,
That's a big question. Certainly you're unlikely to find VisualBasic
on Linux or Linux
The comparison is impressive. Thanks!
-Original Message-
From: Martin Stricker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 4:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: General LINUX Question
Bruce Fry wrote:
We're researching the opportunity of server consolidation
Important data and articles, thanks!
-Original Message-
From: Dwight Tuinstra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 3:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: General LINUX Question
Bruce ---
Look over recent copies of the C/C++ Users Journal (ISSN 1075-2838
On Monday 09 September 2002 06:23 am, Colin Walls wrote:
Is it as user friendly? No.
UNIX is user friendly - it is just very particular who its friends are.
Let's understand that ease of use and efficiency of use are orthogonal
concepts. In a GUI, it is very easy to navigate through
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 6:24 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: General LINUX Question
-Original Message-
From: Rick Troth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Is it as user friendly? No.
UNIX is user friendly - it is just very particular who its friends are.
I want to argue against that with a sample:
The Austrian oil company OMV runs several very big
SAP R3 applications (approved by SAP) for
several 1000 users under Linux on the mainframe. Why ?
A lot less cost and less administration overhead than running
the software on other servers, and FAR
Anyone,
We're researching the opportunity of server consolidation through the
investment of LINUX images on our mainframe. Is anyone aware of compiler
limitations concerning programming languages, or anything at all between
Microsoft or Unix environments to LINUX? Several members of our
not a
guarantee, but the chances are better than if everyone was losing money.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Alan Cox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 12:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: General LINUX Question
-snip-
As to whether S/390 is an IBM cash
Thanks! It does.
-Original Message-
From: Rick Troth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 11:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: General LINUX Question
We're researching the opportunity of server consolidation through the
investment of LINUX images on our
Thanks for the info, it helps!
-Original Message-
From: Thomas David Rivers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 1:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: General LINUX Question
Anyone,
We're researching the opportunity of server consolidation through
, September 06, 2002 2:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: General LINUX Question
I need examples like this, thanks!
-Original Message-
From: H. Szumovski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 1:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: General LINUX Question
I
I need examples like this, thanks!
-Original Message-
From: H. Szumovski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 1:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: General LINUX Question
I want to argue against that with a sample:
The Austrian oil company OMV runs several
Thanks, this all helps!
-Original Message-
From: Alan Cox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 11:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: General LINUX Question
On Fri, 2002-09-06 at 16:59, Bruce Fry wrote:
We're researching the opportunity of server
Thanks!
-Original Message-
From: Post, Mark K [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 11:46 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: General LINUX Question
Bruce,
That's a big question. Certainly you're unlikely to find VisualBasic on
Linux or Linux/390. Microsoft
: Friday, September 06, 2002 1:28 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: General LINUX Question
I don't think there's any debate about Linux and Linux/390
being a cash cow
for IBM. It is, hands down, which is a good thing for IBM,
and hopefully as
a result, the Linux community. The more
That's what _I_ call making money from Linux. They wouldn't have had that
revenue if it weren't for Linux.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: McKown, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 3:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: General LINUX Question
On Friday 06 September 2002 11:59 am, Bruce Fry wrote:
We're researching the opportunity of server consolidation through the
investment of LINUX images on our mainframe. Is anyone aware of compiler
limitations concerning programming languages, or anything at all between
Microsoft or Unix
On Fri, 2002-09-06 at 17:45, Post, Mark K wrote:
Bruce,
That's a big question. Certainly you're unlikely to find VisualBasic on
Linux or Linux/390. Microsoft has been understandably reluctant to make
Historically the Unix world has used perl/python for the job that visual
basic gets used
On Fri, 2002-09-06 at 21:13, Scott Courtney wrote:
Linux started as a reverse-engineered UNIX-like operating system, and although
today it has many new features that aren't common to all *NIX systems, there
is still enormous commonality.
Linux was not reverse engineered from Unix.
Bruce ---
Look over recent copies of the C/C++ Users Journal (ISSN 1075-2838,
http://www.cuj.com) or Dr. Dobb's Journal (ISSN 1044-789X,
http://www.ddj.com), checking the adverts and product announcements (and
even articles). You'll see plenty of commercial stuff for Linux. You
can also
Bruce,
That's a big question. Certainly you're unlikely to find VisualBasic
on Linux or Linux/390.
However, Stryon ( http://www.stryon.com ) has a VisualBasic to Java
conversion product!
Regards, Jim
Bruce Fry wrote:
We're researching the opportunity of server consolidation through the
investment of LINUX images on our mainframe. Is anyone aware of
compiler limitations concerning programming languages, or anything at
all between Microsoft or Unix environments to LINUX? Several members
there's a lot of folk who say it doesn't work well that's the reason
the kernel's shipped without the support being built.
Writing is said to be especially hazardous to the data.
Reading seems pretty solid now days although I doubt it works at all on XP.
Generally its best to exchange data
How to access NTFS from Linux?
Is there an easy way to access NTFS File system from SuSe Linux in a dual
boot PC?
Do I have to recompile the kernel to do this?
Thanks,
Samy Rengasamy.
be docs for it in your linux
source directory.
chris (this was also written by a five y/o child!) :
From: Rengasamy, Samy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2002/04/15 Mon PM 06:15:25 EDT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: General Linux Question
How to access NTFS from Linux?
Is there an easy way
Now, now. That excuse worked once/twice before. We're not going to let you
get away with it forever! :)
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Chris Little [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 6:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: General Linux Question
-snip
not caused any problems,
as Chris indicates.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Chris Little [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 6:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: General Linux Question
There is an NTFS module available. If I'm not mistaken, read works pretty
well
29 matches
Mail list logo
