On Thursday, 11/15/2007 at 05:28 EST, "Spracklen, Ken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I think part of my confusion came from reading section 4.3 of the Linux
> for IBM System z9 and IBM zSeries redbook and mis-interpreting the
> paragraph regarding the hipersockets not using LAN frame, instead they
rsday, November 15, 2007 09:12
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Hipersocket Guest Lan Question
On Wednesday, 11/14/2007 at 06:00 EST, "Spracklen, Ken"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Recently we started planning for Linux guests to access data on the
> z/os lpars via hipersocke
On Wednesday, 11/14/2007 at 06:00 EST, "Spracklen, Ken"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Recently we started planning for Linux guests to access data on the z/os
> lpars via hipersockets. As part of that process, we defined a new
> hipersocket, IUTIQDEF, to the z/VM TCPIP guest profile and added the
>
>>> On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 4:21 PM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Spracklen, Ken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-snip-
> Recently we started planning for Linux guests to access data on the z/os
> lpars via hipersockets. As part of that process, we defined a new
> hipersocket, IUTIQDEF, to the z/
Hi,
Considering the following scenario possible.
One our CEC we have 3 z/os lpars and an IFL running z/VM 5.3. On the
z/VM we have a few SUSE Linux quests as well as TCPIP and MPROUTE
guests. On all three z/OS lpars and the TCPIP guest I have a hipersocket
device, IUTIQDFF, defined in the profil