Re: IODF-HCD Defining FCP on a z9 for z/Linux

2008-01-14 Thread Robert J Brenneman
Both Linux and VM can talk directly to the channels so you don't have to define anything for Linux or VM in HCD OS config. As long as the channels, CU devices are attached to the lpar Linux VM can use them. -- Jay Brenneman

Re: IODF-HCD Defining FCP on a z9 for z/Linux

2008-01-14 Thread Mark Post
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 4:11 PM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Robert J Brenneman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Both Linux and VM can talk directly to the channels so you don't have to define anything for Linux or VM in HCD OS config. As long as the channels, CU devices are attached to the lpar

Re: IODF-HCD Defining FCP on a z9 for z/Linux

2008-01-14 Thread Alan Altmark
On Monday, 01/14/2008 at 04:46 EST, Mark Post [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 4:11 PM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Robert J Brenneman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Both Linux and VM can talk directly to the channels so you don't have to define anything for Linux or VM in HCD

Re: IODF-HCD Defining FCP on a z9 for z/Linux

2008-01-14 Thread Sam Bass
Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Post Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 3:38 PM To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject:Re: IODF-HCD Defining FCP on a z9 for z/Linux On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 4:11 PM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Robert J Brenneman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote

Re: IODF-HCD Defining FCP on a z9 for z/Linux

2008-01-14 Thread Marcy Cortes
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [LINUX-390] IODF-HCD Defining FCP on a z9 for z/Linux On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 5:11 PM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Alan Altmark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -snip- Define attached in this context. Configured is the term of art. As long as the chpids, CUs

Re: IODF-HCD Defining FCP on a z9 for z/Linux

2008-01-14 Thread Mark Post
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 5:11 PM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Alan Altmark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -snip- Define attached in this context. Configured is the term of art. As long as the chpids, CUs, and devices are configured to the VM LPAR (via IOCDS, HCD, or dynamic DEFINE), then CP

Re: IODF-HCD Defining FCP on a z9 for z/Linux

2008-01-14 Thread Alan Altmark
On Monday, 01/14/2008 at 05:43 EST, Mark Post [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This was the problem the OP was having. Since the LPAR was defined as being an MVS LPAR (BTW, why should PR/SM care what OS is to be run in the LPAR?), HCD would not allow him to configure the FCP I/O devices onto the

IODF-HCD Defining FCP on a z9 for z/Linux

2008-01-11 Thread Sam Bass
I am trying to define FCP Channel, Controller and Unit so z/Linux native can use it. The LPAR that we are using for z/Linux is defined as MVS. HCD does not allow me to attach FCP units to an MVS LPAR. If I define a new LPAR as VM and it allows me to attach it. In order for z/Linux native to