Red Hat 7.1 and 7.2 were not commercial product offerings from Red Hat.
Red Hat introduced its commercial offering with Red Hat Enterprise Linux
2.1, which was not offered on the s390. So I believe that there is
confusion here between what is Red Hat Enterprise Linux and what is Linux.
uname -r
On 12/3/2008 at 9:41 AM, Eric Sammons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Red Hat 7.1 and 7.2 were not commercial product offerings from Red Hat.
Red Hat introduced its commercial offering with Red Hat Enterprise Linux
2.1,
I'm sure the people at Red Hat who were there at the time would be very
Mark Post wrote:
On 12/3/2008 at 9:41 AM, Eric Sammons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Red Hat 7.1 and 7.2 were not commercial product offerings from Red Hat.
Red Hat introduced its commercial offering with Red Hat Enterprise Linux
2.1,
I'm sure the people at Red Hat who were there at the time
David Boyes wrote:
I could be wrong, but I think the first 390-enabled RHEL was RHEL
3.x.
2.4
is really, really ancient.
I think you are wrong;
I probably am. I'm told it's a genetic failing in men. 8-)
--
For LINUX-390
Going to try and help out David here, and Like David I may be wrong, but I
don't see a RHEL 2.1 AS for any platform other than ia64 and i386.
-Eric
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 9:19 AM, David Boyes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Boyes wrote:
I could be wrong, but I think the first 390-enabled
On 12/2/2008 at 10:50 AM, Eric Sammons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Going to try and help out David here, and Like David I may be wrong, but I
don't see a RHEL 2.1 AS for any platform other than ia64 and i386.
The very first versions of Red Hat for the mainframe were Red Hat Linux 7.2 for
31-bit
I could be wrong, but I think the first 390-enabled RHEL was
RHEL 3.x. 2.4 is really, really ancient.
David: I think you are right here. My records show the first RHEL
release to support s390 and s390x was RHEL 3 Update 3 which was
kernel level 2.4.21. This may be the confusion with 2.4.
Jim
Do we have a RHEL 2.4 available for my Z9? Is anyone using it today?
Lea Stahr
Senior Systems Engineer
Linux and zLinux
Navistar, Inc.
630-753-5445
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff /
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stahr, Lea wrote:
Do we have a RHEL 2.4 available for my Z9? Is anyone using it today?
I assume you mean a redhat enterprise with a linux kernel revision of
2.4, yes? Because RHEL 2 is only ever released up to RHEL 2.1
As it happens, RHEL 3 is
I could be wrong, but I think the first 390-enabled RHEL was RHEL 3.x. 2.4
is really, really ancient.
-- db
On 12/1/08 12:47 PM, Stahr, Lea [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do we have a RHEL 2.4 available for my Z9? Is anyone using it today?
Lea Stahr
Senior Systems Engineer
Linux and
I'll chime in here, RHEL 3 on s390 was not pretty. I highly suggest you go
to at least RHEL 4, the later the better (4.7 is the latest); if possible go
to RHEL 5.
-Eric
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 1:09 PM, Patrick Spinler [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David Boyes wrote:
I could be wrong, but I think the first 390-enabled RHEL was RHEL 3.x. 2.4
is really, really ancient.
I think you are wrong; I seem to recall a 2.1 for 390 and a 2.1 beta for
390x.
I also think that was a 2.2 kernel. Long may it RIP.
--
Cheers
John
-- spambait
[EMAIL
12 matches
Mail list logo
