On 9/9/19, 11:49 PM, "Linux on 390 Port on behalf of Jake Anderson"
wrote:
ro ramdisk_size=4 cio_ignore=all,!condev"
I should have seen this earlier. Duh. There's your missing quote - at the end
of the above line.
He is implying that the contents of your GENERIC PRM file needs fixing.
On 9/11/19, 06:53, "Linux on 390 Port on behalf of Jake Anderson"
wrote:
"Looks like the storage component blivet of anaconda tries to parse the
kernel
commandline in order to configure FCoE, and it does not
"Looks like the storage component blivet of anaconda tries to parse the
kernel
commandline in order to configure FCoE, and it does not like what's in the
kernel command line, probably a mis-balanced quote. The kernel command line
comes from the parm file you booted the installer with."
Is this
On 9/10/19 6:54 PM, Adolph Kahan wrote:
Jake, I installed into an LPAR using FTP server running on Intel Based Linux.
Here is my prm file. This should be a single line
While it's certainly safe to have it as one single line, I think that bug was
fixed quite a while ago, so not only the kernel
On 9/11/19 10:37 AM, Jake Anderson wrote:
I tried again the first error message went off but this time message is
different
Ý 116.752969¨ anacondaÝ1837¨: Traceback (most recent call last):
Ý 116.753003¨ anacondaÝ1837¨: File "/usr/sbin/anaconda", line 285, in
Ý 116.753145¨
I tried again the first error message went off but this time message is
different
Ý Ý0;32m OK Ý0m¨ Started Hardware RNG Entropy Gatherer
Daemon.
Starting Login
Service...
Starting pre-anaconda logging
service...
Starting Service enabling compressing RAM with
Thanks I will transfer again.. I was pretty sure that kernel, initrd disk
were transferred as binary.
I will try again transferring.
On Wed, 11 Sep, 2019, 8:37 AM David Boyes, wrote:
> > On Sep 11, 2019, at 12:04 AM, Jake Anderson
> wrote:
> >
> > Ok there was an error with the subnet mask
> On Sep 11, 2019, at 12:04 AM, Jake Anderson wrote:
>
> Ok there was an error with the subnet mask and it is going fine, but find
> some message which am not sure from Linux point of view .
>
> Warnings : can't find installer main page path in .treeinfo
>
> AnacondaY1787 : raise Value
Ok there was an error with the subnet mask and it is going fine, but find
some message which am not sure from Linux point of view .
Warnings : can't find installer main page path in .treeinfo
AnacondaY1787 : raise Value error("No closing quotation")
AnacondaY1787 : valueError: No closing
On 9/10/19, 11:58 AM, "Linux on 390 Port on behalf of Jake Anderson"
wrote:
Is there anyone who have attempted to install redhat from windows instead
of mounting in Linux server ?
Just wanted to understand your experience ? If this is doable or not ?
You may have more
Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port On Behalf Of Jake Anderson
Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2019 12:44 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Redhat 8.1 error
So right now I don't have an option to use Linux location to mount this ISO..
Is there a way to make this work using ftp folder
So right now I don't have an option to use Linux location to mount this
ISO..
Is there a way to make this work using ftp folder by placing the redhat
image in it ?
Or else are there any other alternative to attempt this installation ?
On Tue, 10 Sep, 2019, 8:38 PM Neale Ferguson, wrote:
> Not
Not in many years when mounting an ISO image for use in an FTP installation
required what was called "Rock Ridge Extensions". This was back in the days of
Win2K and WinXP so I can't imagine this is still required today.
On 9/10/19, 11:58, "Linux on 390 Port on behalf of Jake Anderson"
wrote:
Even the condev to removed ?
Is there anyone who have attempted to install redhat from windows instead
of mounting in Linux server ?
Just wanted to understand your experience ? If this is doable or not ?
On Tue, 10 Sep, 2019, 7:48 PM Mark Post, wrote:
> On 9/9/19 11:48 PM, Jake Anderson
On 9/9/19 11:48 PM, Jake Anderson wrote:
> ro ramdisk_size=4 cio_ignore=all,!condev"
Please, please, please, get rid of that cio_ignore parameter. When
installing Linux as a guest of z/VM, it's absolutely useless and has
frequently caused all sorts of problems.
Mark Post
on 390 Port on behalf of Jake Anderson
Sent: September 10, 2019 2:45 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Redhat 8.1 error
I am trying to FTP the Linux files from my windows (which is an ftp
server).
After changing enccw0.0.0600:none to
enc600:none. The message was different this time
Also, make sure you don't change the filename or directory case. Windows
doesn't care it
a file is uppercase/lowercase, but Linux will.
On Tue, 2019-09-10 at 09:53 +0200, Dan Horák wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Sep 2019 11:29:29 +0400
> Jake Anderson wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > No firewall is not
On Tue, 10 Sep 2019 11:29:29 +0400
Jake Anderson wrote:
> Hi
>
> No firewall is not blocking as I tested from the guest session with
> FTP command and I was able to logon to my windows FTP server from zVM.
>
> Secondly I have moved all the image file content to my windows FTP
> folder Which
Hi
No firewall is not blocking as I tested from the guest session with FTP
command and I was able to logon to my windows FTP server from zVM.
Secondly I have moved all the image file content to my windows FTP folder
Which has
Boot - security catalogue
Cdboot - disc image file
Cdboot - PRM file
On Tue, 10 Sep 2019 10:45:04 +0400
Jake Anderson wrote:
> I am trying to FTP the Linux files from my windows (which is an ftp
> server).
>
> After changing enccw0.0.0600:none to
>
> enc600:none. The message was different this time and I got
>
> RTNETLINK answers : Network is unreachable
IIRC
I am trying to FTP the Linux files from my windows (which is an ftp
server).
After changing enccw0.0.0600:none to
enc600:none. The message was different this time and I got
RTNETLINK answers : Network is unreachable
Warning : can't find installer main image path in .treeinfo
Failed to
On Tue, 10 Sep 2019 07:48:09 +0400
Jake Anderson wrote:
> ro ramdisk_size=4 cio_ignore=all,!condev"
> Ip=9.1.3.35::9.1.3.1:20:jaklnx.cit.mov.internal:enccw0.0.0600:none
please make sure all options are in lowercase (ip=), udev in rhel8
changed/shortened the persistent naming for network
ro ramdisk_size=4 cio_ignore=all,!condev"
Ip=9.1.3.35::9.1.3.1:20:jaklnx.cit.mov.internal:enccw0.0.0600:none
rd.znet=qeth,0.0.0600,0.0.0601,0.0.0602,layer2=1
nameserver=9.1.6.14 nameserver=9.1.6.17
inst.repo=ftp://mylogin:password@9.1.9.166//images
rd.dasd=0.0.0100 rd.dasd=0.0.0101
What does your parm file look like?
On 9/9/19, 04:28, "Linux on 390 Port on behalf of Jake Anderson"
wrote:
Hi
When I run RHEL81 exec from the linux guest logon I get some message like
Sha256 module not found
DASD layout is not supported
DASD.conf
Hi
When I run RHEL81 exec from the linux guest logon I get some message like
Sha256 module not found
DASD layout is not supported
DASD.conf warning: 0.0.0100 is already online not configuring.
Warning : dracut-initqueue timeout - starting timeout scripts.
Warning /Dev/root does not exist.
25 matches
Mail list logo
