On 08/17/2016 12:14 PM, Mark Post wrote:
> I'm hoping that when people are saying "SLES12" they are really
> meaning "SLES12 SP1 or later." SLES12 GA has been out of support for
> a while now.
Oh, definitely. For sure :) As soon as we jump in we'll grab the latest...
> With SLES12, zipl really
>>> On 8/17/2016 at 06:14 AM, Jorge Fábregas wrote:
> I'm looking forward to btrfs on SLES 12; specifically its snapshot
I'm hoping that when people are saying "SLES12" they are really meaning "SLES12
SP1 or later." SLES12 GA has been out of support for a while now.
> capabilities and how we
On 08/16/2016 02:45 PM, Marcy Cortes wrote:
> Was wondering what other people have decided to do for their file systems in
> SLES 12.
> Stable tried and try ext3 or new function (and more space) with btrfs.
I'm looking forward to btrfs on SLES 12; specifically its snapshot
capabilities and how we
On 08/16/2016 06:20 PM, Rick Troth wrote:
> The problem with EXT3/4 is mostly that the EXT*FS family has fallen out
> of popularity. They're rock solid. They just work
Is ext4 available con SLES 12 (s390x)? We haven't tried SLES 12 yet as
we're waiting for Oracle to certify its database against
On 08/16/2016 04:55 PM, Marcy Cortes wrote:
> Larry wrote:
> "I would look at your backup mechanism and make sure it is compatible before
> you commit to it."
>
> Thanks Larry, that answers that!!
A note about volume management:
Btrfs can do multi-volume backing store. In English, a Btrfs filesy
Rick wrote:
"Where possible, keep your business apps above the op sys. Curious what backup
methods (or products) would have trouble because of a different filesystem."
We do and it's Netbackup. It may well work but it is currently has a note that
says unsupported. Many times that means "unt
On 08/16/2016 04:55 PM, Marcy Cortes wrote:
> Larry wrote:
> "I would look at your backup mechanism and make sure it is compatible before
> you commit to it."
>
> Thanks Larry, that answers that!!
Where possible, keep your business apps above the op sys. Curious what
backup methods (or products)
Thanks, Aria. Good to know!
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Aria
Bamdad
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 2:27 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [LINUX-390] SLES 12 - to btrfs or not to btrfs
Marcy you also asked about xfs
us problems if they were due for a check.
Aria
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Marcy
Cortes
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 2:46 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: SLES 12 - to btrfs or not to btrfs
Was wondering what other
Behalf Of van
Sleeuwen, Berry
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 4:50 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: SLES 12 - to btrfs or not to btrfs
Hi Larry,
Can you explain your changed procedures a bit more? What are the
considerations, pitfalls etc?
We are going to install new (SLES12) machines
ct: Re: SLES 12 - to btrfs or not to btrfs
Hello,
On 16 August 2016 at 19:45, Marcy Cortes wrote:
> Was wondering what other people have decided to do for their file systems in
> SLES 12.
> Stable tried and try ext3 or new function (and more space) with btrfs. Any
> use of xfs?
&
, August 16, 2016 8:59 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: SLES 12 - to btrfs or not to btrfs
We are using btrfs and it just requires some changes to adding DASD and
expanding file systems.
I would look at your backup mechanism and make sure it is compatible before you
commit to it
Larry wrote:
"I would look at your backup mechanism and make sure it is compatible before
you commit to it."
Thanks Larry, that answers that!!
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lis
>>> On 8/16/2016 at 03:17 PM, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 16 August 2016 at 19:45, Marcy Cortes
> wrote:
>> Was wondering what other people have decided to do for their file systems in
> SLES 12.
>> Stable tried and try ext3 or new function (and more space) with btrfs. Any
>
We have kicked the tires of btrfs, but are still staying with ext3 for now.
-Mike MacIsaac
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 3:17 PM, Dimitri John Ledkov
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 16 August 2016 at 19:45, Marcy Cortes
> wrote:
> > Was wondering what other people have decided to do for their file
> syst
Hello,
On 16 August 2016 at 19:45, Marcy Cortes wrote:
> Was wondering what other people have decided to do for their file systems in
> SLES 12.
> Stable tried and try ext3 or new function (and more space) with btrfs. Any
> use of xfs?
>
It is a different kind of pokemon.
Do you have softwa
@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Marcy
Cortes
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 2:53 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: SLES 12 - to btrfs or not to btrfs
"tried and true" that is.
darn autocorrect
Marcy
--
For LINUX-390
"tried and true" that is.
darn autocorrect
Marcy
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvin
Was wondering what other people have decided to do for their file systems in
SLES 12.
Stable tried and try ext3 or new function (and more space) with btrfs. Any
use of xfs?
Marcy
This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are
not the addressee or authorized
19 matches
Mail list logo
