Re: Shared fcp between two linux guests

2010-06-24 Thread Christof Schmitt
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 02:53:23PM -0400, Bob McCarthy wrote: > Ray, >The following displays are for the 2nd RedHat guest that is brought > up. It fails. > > > kernel: zfcp: The adapter 0.0.2107 reported the following > characteristics: > tdcrac02 kernel: WWNN 0x5005076400cb90c4, WWPN 0x500507

Re: Shared fcp between two linux guests

2010-06-24 Thread Bob McCarthy
r = "IBM02000B90C4" speed = "2 Gbit" supported_classes = "Class 2, Class 3" supported_speeds = "4 Gbit" tgtid_bind_type = "wwpn (World Wide Port Name)" Class = "scsi_host" cmd_per_lun = &

Re: Shared fcp between two linux guests

2010-06-24 Thread Raymond Higgs
Linux on 390 Port wrote on 06/24/2010 01:02:06 PM: > Bob McCarthy > Sent by: Linux on 390 Port > > 06/24/2010 01:02 PM > > Please respond to > Linux on 390 Port > > To > > LINUX-390@vm.marist.edu > > cc > > Subject > > Re: Shared fcp betw

Re: Shared fcp between two linux guests

2010-06-24 Thread Raymond Higgs
Linux on 390 Port wrote on 06/24/2010 12:24:38 PM: > Alan Altmark/Endicott/i...@ibmus > Sent by: Linux on 390 Port > > 06/24/2010 12:24 PM > > Please respond to > Linux on 390 Port > > To > > LINUX-390@vm.marist.edu > > cc > > Subject > > Re:

Re: Shared fcp between two linux guests

2010-06-24 Thread Mark Post
>>> On 6/24/2010 at 10:43 AM, Bob McCarthy wrote: > Additionally, we have set up two guests with the exact same > configuration, but using SUSE 10SP2. This configuration has no problems > sharing the SAN disk. Is there configuration in RedHat that must be done > that would be different from SUSE

Re: Shared fcp between two linux guests

2010-06-24 Thread Bob McCarthy
: Thursday, June 24, 2010 12:25 PM To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: Shared fcp between two linux guests On Thursday, 06/24/2010 at 10:59 EDT, Richard Troth wrote: > > NPIV is not turned on at the lpar level, but it is turned on at the SAN > > level. > > If you're sharin

Re: Shared fcp between two linux guests

2010-06-24 Thread Bob McCarthy
Re: Shared fcp between two linux guests Bob -- You said: > NPIV is not turned on at the lpar level, but it is turned on at the > SAN level. If you're sharing the same physical FCP adapter(s) between the two Linux guests, then you probably need NPIV (at the LPAR level). I cannot i

Re: Shared fcp between two linux guests

2010-06-24 Thread Alan Altmark
On Thursday, 06/24/2010 at 10:59 EDT, Richard Troth wrote: > > NPIV is not turned on at the lpar level, but it is turned on at the SAN > > level. > > If you're sharing the same physical FCP adapter(s) between the two > Linux guests, then you probably need NPIV (at the LPAR level). > > I cannot im

Re: Shared fcp between two linux guests

2010-06-24 Thread Richard Troth
Bob -- You said: > NPIV is not turned on at the lpar level, but it is turned on at the SAN > level. If you're sharing the same physical FCP adapter(s) between the two Linux guests, then you probably need NPIV (at the LPAR level). I cannot imagine how your other Linux guests are able to share a

Shared fcp between two linux guests

2010-06-24 Thread Bob McCarthy
We are planning to setup an Oracle RAC environment with two linux guests on the same vm lpar. They will be accessing fcp disk. The problem is as follows: 1. Guest 1 is brought up. "lszfcp -D" command will show the wwpn and lun as expected 2. Guest 2 is brought up. "lszfcp -D" command shows nothing.