To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: What file system type to use for LVM ?
Hi Listserv,
Just trying to gauge which is the more popular filesystem type to use for
logical volumes, reiserfs or ext3 and why.
Seems like reiserfs will allow resizing through the YaST GUI, whilst ext3
filesystems
On Iau, 2006-04-27 at 13:41 -0400, Hall, Ken (GTI) wrote:
Mount options NOATIME and NODIRATIME
But I don't see those on the current Reiser doc pages.
You wouldn't as they more generic options. Reiserfs does have some
specific options such as those to disable tail packing which are
documented
Thanks David, your comment makes a lot of sense.
Install EVMS and use evmsn in place of the YaST storage gui. Then you
get a nice front end for both, and a whole lot more.
I took a quick look at EVMS, and it does look quite comprehensive.
However, are there any howto's for migrating an
Hi Listserv,
Just trying to gauge which is the more popular filesystem type to use for
logical volumes, reiserfs or ext3 and why.
Seems like reiserfs will allow resizing through the YaST GUI, whilst ext3
filesystems forces CLI interaction.
Bernie Wu
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The information contained
Just trying to gauge which is the more popular filesystem type to use
for
logical volumes, reiserfs or ext3 and why.
Reiserfs is more popular, because it is the default in SuSE. We've
observed a fair number of cases where reiserfs fails at very high I/O
rates, so we tend to use ext3 in places
I thought there were some data corruption problems with Reiser on s390. Is my
impression mistaken?
Jon
snip
Reiserfs is more popular, because it is the default in SuSE. We've
observed a fair number of cases where reiserfs fails at very high I/O
rates, so we tend to use ext3 in places where we
On Apr 27, 2006, at 9:52 AM, Bernard Wu wrote:
Hi Listserv,
Just trying to gauge which is the more popular filesystem type to
use for
logical volumes, reiserfs or ext3 and why.
Seems like reiserfs will allow resizing through the YaST GUI,
whilst ext3
filesystems forces CLI interaction.
I
I thought there were some data corruption problems with Reiser on
s390.
Is my impression mistaken?
That's what I meant by fail. You have to drive it pretty hard to
generate the problem though -- it's some kind of race condition in the
journal code that only appears at very high load (formatting
David Boyes wrote
In a earlier life I had implemented Reiserfs for a series large (200Gb
) samba filesystems. We experienced significant problems at the peak
access times (9am and 4pm) after many months of hair pulling we found
the culprit. The last referenced field was being updated and
file system type to use for LVM ?
David Boyes wrote
In a earlier life I had implemented Reiserfs for a series
large (200Gb
) samba filesystems. We experienced significant problems at the peak
access times (9am and 4pm) after many months of hair pulling we found
the culprit. The last
: Re: [LINUX-390] What file system type to use for LVM ?
David Boyes wrote
In a earlier life I had implemented Reiserfs for a series
large (200Gb
) samba filesystems. We experienced significant problems at the peak
access times (9am and 4pm) after many months of hair pulling we found
the culprit
, Ken (GTI)
Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2006 1:42 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: What file system type to use for LVM ?
Mount options NOATIME and NODIRATIME
But I don't see those on the current Reiser doc pages.
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Hall, Ken (GTI)
Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2006 1:42 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: What file system type to use for LVM ?
Mount options NOATIME and NODIRATIME
But I don't see those on the current Reiser doc pages.
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390
On Thu, 27 Apr 2006, Bernard Wu wrote:
Just trying to gauge which is the more popular filesystem type to use for
logical volumes, reiserfs or ext3 and why.
Seems like reiserfs will allow resizing through the YaST GUI, whilst ext3
filesystems forces CLI interaction.
I've been happy with xfs,
14 matches
Mail list logo