> Xenia, wouldn't it be better if VMRM didn't have ...
> ...
> Our approach is to look in side (sic) the server ...
Moderator - order in the court please! Again, we're all trying to do what
is best for the z/VM/Linux customer.
Let's try to understand the difference between how VMRM and *this oth
Xenia, wouldn't it be better if VMRM didn't have to depend on users
remembering to do this as their workload changes? If they have one large
server say with a large oracle application, the minimum value setting
would have to be the minimum for this server? So all servers are treated
and trimmed eq
I'm curious that Barton wrote on August 28th:
> VMRM has taken so much storage away from servers that the
> server or application dies. I would HIGHLY recommend against using it.
z/VM has recently documented how to keep VMRM from eating up too much
memory, though the mechansim to do so has bee
Barton,
I wrote,
> ... could you point to some numbers ...
You replied, but I don't see a reference to any numbers.
You wrote in a reply:
> VMRM should have been enough, but it has very poor feed back
> mechanisms, and has no clue about what is happening inside Linux.
And:
> With that in mind, wi
>>> On 9/23/2009 at 10:51 AM, Michael MacIsaac wrote:
-snip-
> Good question. You've turned on CMM1 on Linux, but as I understand it,
> there must also be a *collaborative* piece enabled on z/VM.
If you want to have the size of the "balloon" dynamically changed with insight
from the z/VM perspe
Mike, CMM does require a collaborative piece. Or one can tune the
system manually with CMM commands, but that gets boring. VMRM should
have been enough, but it has very poor feed back mechanisms, and has no
clue about what is happening inside Linux. It is thus severely limited,
has lots of repor
X-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [LINUX-390] When will CMMA be removed from the kernel?
This presentation might be of some interest to those looking
at the CMM-1 and CMM2/CMMA options:
http://www.linuxvm.org/Present/SHARE113/S9272lj.pdf
Enjoy.
DJ
- Original Message -
From: "Hall, Ken
This presentation might be of some interest to those looking
at the CMM-1 and CMM2/CMMA options:
http://www.linuxvm.org/Present/SHARE113/S9272lj.pdf
Enjoy.
DJ
- Original Message -
From: "Hall, Ken (GTS)"
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: When will CMMA be removed from
-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:linux-...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Michael MacIsaac
Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 10:51 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [LINUX-390] When will CMMA be removed from the kernel?
Sam,
> We load the CMM module via
> /etc/sysconfig/kernel
>
Sam,
> We load the CMM module via
> /etc/sysconfig/kernel
> MODULES_LOADED_ON_BOOT="vmcp cmm"
>
> So what is it that we have turned on?
Good question. You've turned on CMM1 on Linux, but as I understand it,
there must also be a *collaborative* piece enabled on z/VM.
In both the latest Virtualizat
at we have turned on?
Sam Bass
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:linux-...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Leland Lucius
Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 4:53 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: When will CMMA be removed from the kernel?
Barton Robinson wrote:
>
Barton Robinson wrote:
So you should probably measure the two before deciding on which one you
want to keep. CMM-1 has very positive results, cmma not so positive.
At the risk of bringing on the wrath of the performance gods, I just
have to say that I'm not really interested in measuring whethe
So you should probably measure the two before deciding on which one you
want to keep. CMM-1 has very positive results, cmma not so positive.
Leland Lucius wrote:
Mark Post wrote:
On 9/22/2009 at 11:35 PM, Leland Lucius wrote:
Is it being removed entirely or will distros be providing it?
Fir
Mark Post wrote:
On 9/22/2009 at 11:35 PM, Leland Lucius wrote:
Is it being removed entirely or will distros be providing it?
First, let's distinguish between CMM-1 and CMM-2/CMMA. It is the latter that
is being dropped by IBM. It will remain in the distribution versions in which
it curre
Am Mittwoch 23 September 2009 07:15:23 schrieb Mark Post:
> >>> On 9/22/2009 at 11:35 PM, Leland Lucius wrote:
> >
> > Is it being removed entirely or will distros be providing it?
>
> First, let's distinguish between CMM-1 and CMM-2/CMMA. It is the latter
> that is being dropped by IBM. It wil
>>> On 9/22/2009 at 11:35 PM, Leland Lucius wrote:
> Is it being removed entirely or will distros be providing it?
First, let's distinguish between CMM-1 and CMM-2/CMMA. It is the latter that
is being dropped by IBM. It will remain in the distribution versions in which
it currently resides,
Is it being removed entirely or will distros be providing it?
Leland
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.m
17 matches
Mail list logo