Rob van der Heij wrote:
On Feb 1, 2008 11:36 PM, John Summerfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Rob van der Heij wrote:
On Feb 1, 2008 2:52 PM, Mark Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Gee, I really want to comment, can I, dare I ?
In der Beschr�nkung zeigt sich erst der Meister
My eyes got parit
>>> On Sat, Feb 2, 2008 at 6:19 AM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Mehdi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for replies, so seems that the main reason behind using zLinux under
> z/VM is to have shared resources (CPU, DASD,...) in better management. Will
Those are the technical reasons. The b
Ivan Warren wrote:
on a z9, it's going to be virtualized ANYWAY since I believe you can't
run a z9 in basic mode.
Woah!
z9 does storage virtualization now?
Before z/VM 5.3, I would have somewhat disagreed with you.. However,
starting with z/VM 5.3 which (IIRC) removed preferred/V=R/V=F guest
Mark Perry wrote:
Dear Rob,
getting back to my original post which is being "snipped" mercilessly ;-)
"z/OS is a proprietary OS from IBM designed and engineered
specifically for the IBM System z series of Mainframe computers.
z/OS performs at its best in a non virtualized environment, and that
i
Rob van der Heij wrote:
On Feb 2, 2008 2:45 PM, Mark Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
running natively. My point was that Linux should be run under z/VM, and
that z/OS should be run natively.
For z/OS, you might add "production workload" to that statement. I
have seen many installatio
On Feb 2, 2008 2:45 PM, Mark Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> running natively. My point was that Linux should be run under z/VM, and
> that z/OS should be run natively.
For z/OS, you might add "production workload" to that statement. I
have seen many installations very happy running z/OS in a
Michael MacIsaac wrote:
Linux for System z is at its heart still Linux, and hence was never
or will ever be designed nor engineered with the IBM System z in mind.
But I would like to think that System z Linux developers are driving
virtualization features into the Linux kernel. A couple of exam
> Linux for System z is at its heart still Linux, and hence was never
> or will ever be designed nor engineered with the IBM System z in mind.
But I would like to think that System z Linux developers are driving
virtualization features into the Linux kernel. A couple of examples might
be the tracki
Mehdi wrote:
Thanks for replies, so seems that the main reason behind using zLinux under
z/VM is to have shared resources (CPU, DASD,...) in better management. Will
you suggest z/VM if you have to install z/OS instead zLinux too or that is
another story?
z/OS is a proprietary OS from IBM design
Thanks for replies, so seems that the main reason behind using zLinux under
z/VM is to have shared resources (CPU, DASD,...) in better management. Will
you suggest z/VM if you have to install z/OS instead zLinux too or that is
another story?
Main reason why I want to try zLinux on zSeries is to hav
On Feb 1, 2008 11:36 PM, John Summerfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rob van der Heij wrote:
> > On Feb 1, 2008 2:52 PM, Mark Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Gee, I really want to comment, can I, dare I ?
> >
> > In der Beschr�nkung zeigt sich erst der Meister
>
> My eyes got parity err
Rob van der Heij wrote:
On Feb 1, 2008 2:52 PM, Mark Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Gee, I really want to comment, can I, dare I ?
In der Beschr�nkung zeigt sich erst der Meister
My eyes got parity errors, they can't make any sense of that.
--
Cheers
John
-- spambait
[EMAIL PROTECTE
>>> On Fri, Feb 1, 2008 at 8:42 AM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Mehdi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> I'm a newbie not linux world but to zLinux world. As I know I should be able
> to install zLinux on zseries standalone or under zvm but don't know the
> difference, which one is be
Mehdi wrote:
Hi List,
I'm a newbie not linux world but to zLinux world. As I know I should be able
to install zLinux on zseries standalone or under zvm but don't know the
difference, which one is better, preferable and WHY? I know I'm limited in
number of LPARs if I install zLinux standalone but
On Feb 1, 2008 2:52 PM, Mark Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gee, I really want to comment, can I, dare I ?
In der Beschränkung zeigt sich erst der Meister
-Rob ;-)
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instr
On Friday, 02/01/2008 at 09:29 EST, Mark Pace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 1, 2008 9:15 AM, Chase, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Virtual network: No physical wires, switches; no (or reduced) need to
> > encrypt/decrypt data "in transit" within the box (CPU savings).
>
> Good point, bu
On Feb 1, 2008 9:15 AM, Chase, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Linux on 390 Port On Behalf Of Mark Pace
> >
> > On Feb 1, 2008 8:42 AM, Mehdi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi List,
> > >
> > > I'm a newbie not linux world but to zLinux world. As I kn
> -Original Message-
> From: Linux on 390 Port On Behalf Of Mark Pace
>
> On Feb 1, 2008 8:42 AM, Mehdi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi List,
> >
> > I'm a newbie not linux world but to zLinux world. As I know I should
> > be able to install zLinux on zseries standalone or under zvm
While Linux can be installed in an LPAR directly, there are considerable
advantages to running your Linux images beneath z/VM as a hipervisor.
The first is a common interface to all the consoles. Each is just a virtual
3215 console terminal, with access gained by logging into the Linux guest
useri
Mehdi wrote:
--
/* Of one Essence is the human race,
Thusly has Creation put the Base;
One Limb impacted is sufficient,
For all Others to feel the Mace.
~Saadi (persian poet) -1258 */
--
On Feb 1, 2008 8:42 AM, Mehdi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> I'm a newbie not linux world but to zLinux world. As I know I should be
> able
> to install zLinux on zseries standalone or under zvm but don't know the
> difference, which one is better, preferable and WHY? I know I'm limited
Hi List,
I'm a newbie not linux world but to zLinux world. As I know I should be able
to install zLinux on zseries standalone or under zvm but don't know the
difference, which one is better, preferable and WHY? I know I'm limited in
number of LPARs if I install zLinux standalone but what are other
22 matches
Mail list logo