There is also a unix-like port to C64.. I couldnt believe..
http://www.heilbronn.netsurf.de/~dallmann/lunix/lunix.html
Eberhard
> We were discussing a little while ago the idea of *nix on an Apple ][
> class machine. Well, it seems someone already did it. I don't remember
> where I found it, the the filename is "apple2xinu.tar.gz". What is it?
> You guessed it -- Xinu for the Apple 2.
There was also a package that basi
: I don't think ELKS has floating point support yet, Alistair would be the best
: person to ask this question to, I think.
:
ELKS doesn't yet support floating point. The bcc compiler libraries have
support for 32 bit floating point though. All ELKS float support will have
to come from bc
>
> Perry,
>
> Cool! Thanks for the heads-up on that one. Excellent 16-bit compiler.
>
> I used Turbo C several years doing firmware development for an embedded
> 80c186 processor.
>
> We did not use DOS nor BIOS; we had the Paradigm "locate" program and
> burned the code into eprom. Wrote
: The Problem is that the Tarball has no filename information in it, so
: all the contents just spit put into one large file that I can't use.
:
Sounds like something a typical Apple ][ hacker would do... ;-)
Tell me where it is, I'd like to see this.
gh
Hi all, I was just hopping around old FTP sites, getting some disk
images for my Apple //c, and I ran across a peculiar package.
We were discussing a little while ago the idea of *nix on an Apple ][
class machine. Well, it seems someone already did it. I don't remember
where I found it, the the
On Thursday, July 29, 1999 12:47 PM, Matt [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
: I have an old 286 that's just collecting dust, but if I could use ELKS and
: minicom then I'd have a nice little terminal. Can ELKS run minicom? It
: says it has serial IO support.
:
: Matt
:
What's minicom?
I have an old 286 that's just collecting dust, but if I could use ELKS and
minicom then I'd have a nice little terminal. Can ELKS run minicom? It
says it has serial IO support.
Matt
: The idea would be to get a real mode compiler that can do the things we
: want, but it would need a back end linker to produce ELKS executables.
:
Not if we added back MSDOS binary support in the kernel. This
would be fairly simple to add. We wouldn't have MSDOS emulation, just
the b
On Thursday, July 29, 1999 11:16 AM, David Murn [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
: On Thu, 29 Jul 1999, Perry Harrington wrote:
:
: > I brought up a thread a long time ago on this, Borland wasn't interested
: > then, but they just released Turbo C for free.
:
: Source, or just free binaries? If
On Thu, 29 Jul 1999, Perry Harrington wrote:
> I brought up a thread a long time ago on this, Borland wasn't interested
> then, but they just released Turbo C for free.
Source, or just free binaries? If it's only binaries it's not much use to
us.
> This means we can use it for compiling in the
I brought up a thread a long time ago on this, Borland wasn't interested
then, but they just released Turbo C for free. This means we can use it
for compiling in the ELKS project.
The idea would be to get a real mode compiler that can do the things we
want, but it would need a back end linker to
12 matches
Mail list logo
