Linux-Advocacy Digest #316, Volume #31Sun, 7 Jan 01 04:13:02 EST
Contents:
Re: Nobody wants Linux because it destroys hard disks. ("Kyle Jacobs")
Re: Nobody wants Linux because it destroys hard disks. ("Kyle Jacobs")
Re: Microsoft is 20-years BEHIND other OS vendors ("Tom
Linux-Advocacy Digest #317, Volume #31Sun, 7 Jan 01 05:13:06 EST
Contents:
Re: Need help with NT ("Erik Funkenbusch")
Re: Uptimes ("Erik Funkenbusch")
Re: Windows 2000 ("Erik Funkenbusch")
Re: Windows 2000 ("Erik Funkenbusch")
Re: Windows 2000 ("Tom Wilson")
Re: Windows
Linux-Advocacy Digest #318, Volume #31Sun, 7 Jan 01 05:13:06 EST
Contents:
Re: Why Hatred? ("Erik Funkenbusch")
Re: Operating Systems? Where would you go next? (Andy Newman)
Re: Windows 2000 (Ed Allen)
Linux-Advocacy Digest #319, Volume #31Sun, 7 Jan 01 09:13:05 EST
Contents:
Re: Windows 2000 ("Erik Funkenbusch")
Re: Where can I get good info on setting up Linux (Peter =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=F6hlmann?=)
Re: Sucking Linux 2.0.4!!! ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Linux is crude and
Linux-Advocacy Digest #320, Volume #31Sun, 7 Jan 01 13:13:09 EST
Contents:
Re: Linux is crude and inconsistant. ("MH")
Re: Computers, monopoly... (WAS: Re: Big government and big business: (Jure Sah)
Re: Big government and big business: why not fear both - www.ezboard.com
Linux-Advocacy Digest #321, Volume #31Sun, 7 Jan 01 14:13:03 EST
Contents:
Re: Linux is easier to install than windows ("ono")
Re: RPM Hell (JM)
Re: Nobody wants Linux because it destroys hard disks. (JM)
Re: Windows fails again (JM)
Re: Windows fails again (JM)
Re: open
Linux-Advocacy Digest #322, Volume #31Sun, 7 Jan 01 16:13:06 EST
Contents:
Re: linux does NOT suck (oh yes it does) (Roberto Alsina)
Re: linux does NOT suck (oh yes it does) (Roberto Alsina)
Re: Linux is crude and inconsistant. ("Kyle Jacobs")
Re: Nobody wants Linux because
Linux-Advocacy Digest #323, Volume #31Sun, 7 Jan 01 18:13:04 EST
Contents:
Re: Linux is easier to install than windows ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Linux is not UNIX(tm) ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Why Advocacy? (Roberto Alsina)
Re: Operating Systems? Where would you go next? (John
Linux-Advocacy Digest #325, Volume #31Sun, 7 Jan 01 21:13:04 EST
Contents:
Re: OEditors: Xedit vs. vi or emacs ("Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz")
Re: Operating Systems? Where would you go next? ("Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz")
Re: Operating Systems? Where would you go next? ("Shmuel
Linux-Advocacy Digest #326, Volume #31Sun, 7 Jan 01 22:13:03 EST
Contents:
Re: linux does NOT suck (oh yes it does) ("Kyle Jacobs")
Re: Big government and big business: why not fear both - www.ezboard.com (.)
Re: Could only... (Charlie Ebert)
Re: Would Linux be invented if?
Linux-Advocacy Digest #327, Volume #31Sun, 7 Jan 01 22:13:03 EST
Contents:
Re: Windows 2000 (T. Max Devlin)
Re: Windows 2000 (T. Max Devlin)
Re: Uptimes (T. Max Devlin)
Re: Why Hatred? (T. Max Devlin)
Re: open source is getting worst with time. (T. Max Devlin)
Re: Uptimes
Linux-Advocacy Digest #328, Volume #31Sun, 7 Jan 01 23:13:04 EST
Contents:
Re: Why Hatred? (T. Max Devlin)
Re: Windows fails again (Tim Smith)
Re: Sucking Linux 2.0.4!!! (Tim Smith)
Re: Linux is crude and inconsistant. (Chris Ahlstrom)
Re: Windows fails again (Charlie
Linux-Advocacy Digest #329, Volume #31Mon, 8 Jan 01 00:13:02 EST
Contents:
Re: Why Hatred? (T. Max Devlin)
Re: RPM Hell (T. Max Devlin)
Re: Step-by step to install Linux RH7 and Win98. (gataway)
Re: RPM Hell (T. Max Devlin)
Re: RPM Hell (T. Max Devlin)
Re: RPM Hell (T.
Linux-Advocacy Digest #330, Volume #31Mon, 8 Jan 01 03:13:03 EST
Contents:
Try Linux 2.4.0 next time (was Re: Sucking Linux 2.0.4!!!) EOM (spicerun)
Re: RPM Hell (J Sloan)
Re: Linux is crude and inconsistant. ("Kyle Jacobs")
Re: Linux is crude and inconsistant. ("Kyle
14 matches
Mail list logo
