Linux-Advocacy Digest #302, Volume #35 Sat, 16 Jun 01 13:13:03 EDT
Contents:
Re: More microsoft innovation (Rick)
Re: Linux inheriting DLL Hell (Mark)
Re: More microsoft innovation (Rick)
Re: Linux penetration MUCH lower than previously claimed (The Ghost In The Machine)
Re
Linux-Advocacy Digest #302, Volume #34Mon, 7 May 01 17:13:02 EDT
Contents:
Re: the Boom, Boom department (.)
Re: Microsoft standards... (was Re: Windows 2000 - It is a crappy product) (Edward
Rosten)
Re: Why is Microsoft opening more Windows source code? (Erik Funkenbusch
Linux-Advocacy Digest #302, Volume #31Sat, 6 Jan 01 15:13:05 EST
Contents:
Re: Why Hatred? (T. Max Devlin)
Re: Deja No News ("Ayende Rahien")
Re: Computers, monopoly... (WAS: Re: Big government and big business: why not fear
both - www.ezboard.com) ("Ayende Rah
Linux-Advocacy Digest #302, Volume #30 Sun, 19 Nov 00 02:13:02 EST
Contents:
Re: I have had it up to *here* with Linux (Uncle Fester)
Re: It's even worse than I thought. (Gary Hallock)
Re: Linux Can't find PC133 memory??? (munke)
Re: Need some advice on Linux (nickr_21045)
Re
Linux-Advocacy Digest #302, Volume #29 Mon, 25 Sep 00 13:13:04 EDT
Contents:
Re: Id Software developer prefers OS X to Linux, NT ("Stuart Fox")
Re: Because programmers hate users (Re: Why are Linux UIs so crappy?) (Roberto
Alsina)
Re: The Linux Experience
Re:
Linux-Advocacy Digest #302, Volume #28Tue, 8 Aug 00 06:13:05 EDT
Contents:
Re: ATTN: REX BALLARD: Microsoft's contracts not volountary (Steve Chaney)
Re: MS advert says Win98 13 times less reliable than W2k ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Why Linux will crash and burn...
Linux-Advocacy Digest #302, Volume #26 Fri, 28 Apr 00 23:13:04 EDT
Contents:
Re: Beer Tosser a Sabre Fan? Nope. (Charles Philip Chan)
Re: So what is wrong with X? (Christopher Browne)
Re: Microsoft Office Linux Edition! ("Mike Palmer")
Re: X Windows must DIE!!! (C
