Linux-Advocacy Digest #429

2001-05-11 Thread Digestifier
Linux-Advocacy Digest #429, Volume #34 Fri, 11 May 01 16:13:04 EDT Contents: Re: Justice Department LOVES Microsoft! (Bob Hauck) Re: W2K/IIS proves itself over Linux/Tux (mlw) Re: W2K/IIS proves itself over Linux/Tux ("Ayende Rahien") Re: Linux still not ready fo

Linux-Advocacy Digest #429

2001-04-07 Thread Digestifier
Linux-Advocacy Digest #429, Volume #33Sat, 7 Apr 01 05:13:03 EDT Contents: Re: Communism (Roberto Alsina) Re: IA32, was an advocacy rant (Brian Inglis) Re: IA32, was an advocacy rant (Brian Inglis) Re: "The Linux Desktop", by T. Max Devlin (Bloody Viking) Re:

Linux-Advocacy Digest #429

2001-02-23 Thread Digestifier
Linux-Advocacy Digest #429, Volume #32 Fri, 23 Feb 01 11:13:05 EST Contents: Re: State of linux distros (chrisv) Re: Microsoft says Linux threatens innovation (T. Max Devlin) Re: Are todays computers 1000 times better than the original PCs? (chrisv) Re: Maximum Linux Magazine

Linux-Advocacy Digest #429

2001-01-12 Thread Digestifier
Linux-Advocacy Digest #429, Volume #31 Fri, 12 Jan 01 23:13:02 EST Contents: Re: Linux is crude and inconsistant. ("Kyle Jacobs") Re: Linux is crude and inconsistant. ("Kyle Jacobs") Re: Linux is crude and inconsistant. ("Kyle Jacobs") Re: Anyone g

Linux-Advocacy Digest #429

2000-11-26 Thread Digestifier
Linux-Advocacy Digest #429, Volume #30 Sun, 26 Nov 00 03:13:03 EST Contents: Re: Anyone have to use (*GAG*) Windows on the job? (mark) Re: does anyone care if linux does not become ultra-popular? (mark) Re: Linux growth rate explosion! (mark) Re: Linux growth rate explosion

Linux-Advocacy Digest #429

2000-10-03 Thread Digestifier
Linux-Advocacy Digest #429, Volume #29Tue, 3 Oct 00 17:13:04 EDT Contents: Re: How low can they go...? ("James A. Robertson") Re: How low can they go...? ("Erik Funkenbusch") Re: Because programmers hate users (Re: Why are Linux UIs so crappy?) (T. Max Devl

Linux-Advocacy Digest #429

2000-08-15 Thread Digestifier
Linux-Advocacy Digest #429, Volume #28 Wed, 16 Aug 00 00:13:03 EDT Contents: Re: Would a M$ Voluntary Split Save It? ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Re: AMD's Sledgehammer (Brett Ryan) Re: MCSE != Engineer (Was: Microsoft MCSE (A transfinite number of monkeys) Re: MCSE != Engineer

Linux-Advocacy Digest #429

2000-07-02 Thread Digestifier
Linux-Advocacy Digest #429, Volume #27Sun, 2 Jul 00 18:13:04 EDT Contents: Re: Linux code going down hill (David M. Cook) Re: We WANT different enviroments (Was: Linux, easy to use? (Matthias Warkus) Re: Linux code going down hill (Timothy Murphy) Re: I hope you trolls are

Linux-Advocacy Digest #429

2000-05-09 Thread Digestifier
Linux-Advocacy Digest #429, Volume #26Tue, 9 May 00 22:13:05 EDT Contents: Re: Why only Microsoft should be allowed to create software ("Erik Funkenbusch") Re: This is Bullsh&^%T!!! (mlw) Re: Why only Microsoft should be allowed to create software (Peter Ammon)

Linux-Advocacy Digest #429

2000-02-28 Thread Digestifier
Linux-Advocacy Digest #429, Volume #25 Mon, 28 Feb 00 14:13:05 EST Contents: Re: My Windows 2000 experience (mlw) Re: My Windows 2000 experience (mlw) Re: My Windows 2000 experience (mlw) Re: Microsoft migrates Hotmail to W2K ("Drestin Black") Re: Microsoft's