Linux-Advocacy Digest #438, Volume #34 Fri, 11 May 01 21:13:07 EDT
Contents:
Re: Richard Stallman what a tosser, and lies about free software (T. Max Devlin)
Re: Richard Stallman what a tosser, and lies about free software (T. Max Devlin)
Re: Richard Stallman what a tosser
Linux-Advocacy Digest #438, Volume #33Sat, 7 Apr 01 19:13:04 EDT
Contents:
Server bankrupt and data gone! (GreyCloud)
Re: lack of linux billionaires explained in one easy message (GreyCloud)
Re: gates messiah ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: OT: Treason (was Re: Communism)
Linux-Advocacy Digest #438, Volume #32 Sat, 24 Feb 01 00:13:03 EST
Contents:
Re: Are todays computers 1000 times better than the original PCs? ("Joseph T. Adams")
Re: Linux Threat: non-existant (Bob Hauck)
Re: SSH vulnerabilities - still waiting [ was Interesting arti
Linux-Advocacy Digest #438, Volume #31 Sat, 13 Jan 01 15:13:04 EST
Contents:
Re: You and Microsoft... ("Mike")
Re: Linux is crude and inconsistant. ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Linux is crude and inconsistant. ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: you dumb. and lazy. (The Ghost In T
Linux-Advocacy Digest #438, Volume #29Wed, 4 Oct 00 00:13:07 EDT
Contents:
Re: IBM announces 64-bit mainframes and 64-bit Linux for S/390 (Gary Hallock)
Re: Because programmers hate users (Re: Why are Linux UIs so crappy?) (Richard)
Re: IBM announces 64-bit mainframes and 64
Linux-Advocacy Digest #438, Volume #27Mon, 3 Jul 00 08:13:05 EDT
Contents:
Re: Where did all my windows go? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
s.n.a.f.u. 1b-i (Uncle)
Re: Hardware: ideal budget Linux box? (Re: I'm Ready! I'm ready! I'm not ready.)
(Jim Cameron)
Re: Linux code going down
Linux-Advocacy Digest #438, Volume #26 Wed, 10 May 00 09:13:07 EDT
Contents:
Re: Why only Microsoft should be allowed to create software (Bob Germer)
Re: Why only Microsoft should be allowed to create software (Bob Germer)
Re: Why only Microsoft should be allowed to create