On Mon, 2010-04-12 at 00:52 +0100, James Morris wrote:
On Mon, April 12, 2010 00:38, James Morris wrote:
Hi,
I'm pretty sure I've seen this dealt with on the list before, but can't
find it.
With the program I'm fumbling around trying to create, it will be possible
for successive
James Morris wrote:
On Mon, April 12, 2010 00:38, James Morris wrote:
Hi,
I'm pretty sure I've seen this dealt with on the list before, but can't
find it.
With the program I'm fumbling around trying to create, it will be possible
for successive note on events for the same pitch to
James Morris wrote:
On Mon, April 12, 2010 00:38, James Morris wrote:
Hi,
I'm pretty sure I've seen this dealt with on the list before, but can't
find it.
With the program I'm fumbling around trying to create, it will be possible
for successive note on events for the same pitch to
On Mon, 2010-04-12 at 08:07 +0200, Jens M Andreasen wrote:
The question is what happens at the other end when a note gets struck a
second time.
a) Nothing, the note is already on.
b) Re-trigger, the voice is reset and the note gets played from the top
c) Trigger, a new voice is assigned
Thorsten Wilms wrote:
On Mon, 2010-04-12 at 08:07 +0200, Jens M Andreasen wrote:
The question is what happens at the other end when a note gets struck a
second time.
a) Nothing, the note is already on.
b) Re-trigger, the voice is reset and the note gets played from the top
c) Trigger,
On Mon, 2010-04-12 at 10:26 +0200, Thorsten Wilms wrote:
On Mon, 2010-04-12 at 08:07 +0200, Jens M Andreasen wrote:
The question is what happens at the other end when a note gets struck a
second time.
a) Nothing, the note is already on.
b) Re-trigger, the voice is reset and the note
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 02:16:40 +0200
From: jul...@c-lab.de
never saw anyone doing that. So if you have pairs of information, try to put
them in one or the other half of these 80 chars, not somewhere in between.
The code attempts to use a single 40 character line as per you comments on
On Mon, 2010-04-12 at 12:30 +0200, Jens M Andreasen wrote:
Surprisingly, all classical polyphonic keyboards like piano and organ
works according to 'a'. If you - while playing four-handed piano -
accidentally strikes a note already held by the other player, nothing
will happen (in musical
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 6:30 AM, Jens M Andreasen
jens.andrea...@comhem.se wrote:
Polyphony is what is supposed to happen when you strike /different/
notes and doubling notes will normally be done by pressing the
hold-pedal and then striking the note twice.
within JACK and ALSA *sequencer*
Hello Nick!
Again such a nice update. Thanks for that.
I can move my braille display easily enough. The system screen stays the
same, so every bgraille display has navigation controls of some sort to move
the small window, that I can see, across the real screen. Completely in
order for
James Morris wrote:
On Mon, April 12, 2010 07:35, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
James Morris wrote:
On Mon, April 12, 2010 00:38, James Morris wrote:
Hi,
I'm pretty sure I've seen this dealt with on the list before, but can't
find it.
With the program I'm fumbling around trying
On Monday 12 April 2010 02:07:07 Jens M Andreasen wrote:
On Mon, 2010-04-12 at 00:52 +0100, James Morris wrote:
On Mon, April 12, 2010 00:38, James Morris wrote:
Hi,
I'm pretty sure I've seen this dealt with on the list before, but can't
find it.
With the program I'm fumbling
Paul Davis wrote:
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 9:53 AM, drew Roberts z...@100jamz.com wrote:
The question is what happens at the other end when a note gets struck a
second time.
a) Nothing, the note is already on.
b) Re-trigger, the voice is reset and the note gets played from the top
c)
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 10:24 AM, Ralf Mardorf
ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net wrote:
Because of c) you seems to be right OTOH e.g. a natural tom or snare played
two times does sound different to a drum sample played two times, while the
first sample is cut, but if the first sample isn't cut it
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 10:28 AM, Ralf Mardorf
ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net wrote:
c) If you e.g. play the e string of a guitar at the 5th fret and then the a
string, while the guitar is normal e, a, d, g, b, e tuned.
this is not equivalent to the polyphony offered by an electronic
keyboard. the
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 10:33:00AM -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 10:28 AM, Ralf Mardorf
ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net wrote:
c) If you e.g. play the e string of a guitar at the 5th fret and then the a
string, while the guitar is normal e, a, d, g, b, e tuned.
this is not
i dont see how real instruments and midi events are related.
this is pretty OT :P
MIDI has been always about real musical instruments. Do you think that
electronic instruments are not real? The Yamaha Disklavier is not a real
instrument? A MIDIfied pipe organ?
Regards,
Pedro
On Mon, April 12, 2010 12:47, James Morris wrote:
2) when a missing note-off detected, delay the note-on by the smallest
amount of time possible, and insert the note-off in place of it.
Any thoughts on that?
Or send a note-off for pitch n followed by a note on for pitch n within
the same
On Mon, April 12, 2010 09:26, Thorsten Wilms wrote:
polyphonic case, it should be c). Doubling a note seems perfectly
reasonable to me and accidental surplus Note-Ons are simply not
acceptable (I'm also not aware of that being a common problem).
Ok, ok, ok, my last question, this has got me
On Tue, 2010-04-13 at 00:55 +0100, James Morris wrote:
A string of note-ons following each other all for the same pitch n without
any intervening note-offs for pitch n, IS PERFECTLY ACCEPTABLE provided
they are INTENTIONAL and NOT accidental.
Yes, except for that this is an absurdity that
Jens M Andreasen wrote:
On Tue, 2010-04-13 at 00:55 +0100, James Morris wrote:
A string of note-ons following each other all for the same pitch n without
any intervening note-offs for pitch n, IS PERFECTLY ACCEPTABLE provided
they are INTENTIONAL and NOT accidental.
Yes, except
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Jens M Andreasen wrote:
On Tue, 2010-04-13 at 00:55 +0100, James Morris wrote:
A string of note-ons following each other all for the same pitch n
without
any intervening note-offs for pitch n, IS PERFECTLY ACCEPTABLE provided
they are INTENTIONAL and NOT accidental.
22 matches
Mail list logo
