On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 12:48 +0100, Arnold Krille wrote:
On Friday 17 December 2010 10:36:47 Philipp Überbacher wrote:
I guess it really depends on what you try to achieve. Afaik the average
life-span of a HD is puny 2 years. From what I heard the magnetic tapes
used by for example ESA a
On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 07:41 +, Folderol wrote:
On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 03:45:23 +0100
Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net wrote:
You can't remember it, because they cleaned your memory at Gitmo ;).
Anyway, are you able to prove that Gene is mistaken, regarding to his
'paranoia
On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 13:38 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 07:41 +, Folderol wrote:
On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 03:45:23 +0100
Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net wrote:
You can't remember it, because they cleaned your memory at Gitmo ;).
Anyway, are you able
On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 08:13 -0500, gene heskett wrote:
On Thursday, December 16, 2010 08:12:34 am Arnold Krille did opine:
On Thursday 16 December 2010 01:13:24 Dan Kegel wrote:
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 10:48 PM, gene heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com
wrote:
Now, if we can just get a law that
On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 14:38 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 08:13 -0500, gene heskett wrote:
On Thursday, December 16, 2010 08:12:34 am Arnold Krille did opine:
On Thursday 16 December 2010 01:13:24 Dan Kegel wrote:
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 10:48 PM, gene heskett ghesk
On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 14:25 -0800, Dan Kegel wrote:
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 12:41 PM, Tim E. Real termt...@rogers.com wrote:
The amiga is actually fairly late model here folks, I started with a quest
super elf I built from a kit. Circa '77.
1802 CPU fan here too. Mine was RCA COSMAC VIP
On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 23:24 +, Dan Mills wrote:
On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 00:11 +0100, David Olofson wrote:
good gas tight join
And exactly this was the problem for this amplifier, corrosion.
To be fair, I've got a Peavey KB 300 in the storeroom, sometimes it
needs a hit, when in use and I
On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 05:14 -0500, gene heskett wrote:
On Wednesday, December 15, 2010 05:01:58 am Tim E. Real did opine:
On December 14, 2010 10:04:10 pm Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 02:47 +, Harry Van Haaren wrote:
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 2:40 AM, Ralf Mardorf
On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 16:41 +0100, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
On 12/15/2010 11:14 AM, gene heskett wrote:
Ralf I suspect, if he were to use pgp, would be like me, and only trust
pgp-2.6.2a, the last one before they put Zimmerman in jail for a few years.
I have often said, and have been
On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 17:18 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 16:41 +0100, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
On 12/15/2010 11:14 AM, gene heskett wrote:
Ralf I suspect, if he were to use pgp, would be like me, and only trust
pgp-2.6.2a, the last one before they put Zimmerman
On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 16:41 +0100, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
On 12/15/2010 11:14 AM, gene heskett wrote:
Ralf I suspect, if he were to use pgp, would be like me, and only trust
pgp-2.6.2a, the last one before they put Zimmerman in jail for a few years.
I have often said, and have been
On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 21:50 +0100, David Olofson wrote:
...or the FBI just *said* they couldn't do it, to lull us all into a
false sense of security.
Exactly!
___
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 21:47 +0100, Arnold Krille wrote:
On Wednesday 15 December 2010 20:40:20 Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 19:56 +0100, Arnold Krille wrote:
On Wednesday 15 December 2010 16:41:32 Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
On 12/15/2010 11:14 AM, gene heskett wrote
On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 17:42 -0500, gene heskett wrote:
history being written by the winners, so the whole thing may have
been white washed to a high polish by now.
People who put their telephone handset into a thingy to be able to do
data telecommunication, before there was the Internet for
On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 17:48 -0500, gene heskett wrote:
On Wednesday, December 15, 2010 05:44:12 pm Dan Kegel did opine:
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 3:03 AM, Dan Kegel d...@kegel.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 6:47 PM, Harry Van Haaren
harryhaa...@gmail.com wrote:
Anybody know of a
On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 05:02 +0100, Jens M Andreasen wrote:
On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 19:45 -0500, gene heskett wrote:
... but what his own page says now, does not match the emails flying
around about it back in the day. Unforch, to be able to back that up, I
would have to have an email
On Tue, 2010-12-14 at 13:36 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Tue, 2010-12-14 at 06:47 -0500, David Santamauro wrote:
Hi Niels,
On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 17:36:11 -0700
Niels Mayer nielsma...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Ralf Mardorf
ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net
On Tue, 2010-12-14 at 13:14 +, Victor Lazzarini wrote:
Stallman hitting the mainstream news:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/blog/2010/dec/14/chrome-os-richard-stallman-warning
Victor
Hi Victor :)
a good OT post, thank you and full ACK with Stallman here. I'm not all
the time
On Tue, 2010-12-14 at 09:34 -0500, David Santamauro wrote:
On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 13:40:43 +0100
Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net wrote:
On Tue, 2010-12-14 at 13:36 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Tue, 2010-12-14 at 06:47 -0500, David Santamauro wrote:
Hi Niels,
On Mon
On Tue, 2010-12-14 at 15:32 -0500, Paul Davis wrote:
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 3:28 PM, gene heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com wrote:
On Tuesday, December 14, 2010 03:27:37 pm Victor Lazzarini did opine:
Stallman hitting the mainstream news:
On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 02:47 +, Harry Van Haaren wrote:
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 2:40 AM, Ralf Mardorf
ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net wrote:
A lot of people do, but perhaps they do it for mails that
anyway are in
public, e.g. to correspond to mailing lists
On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 08:52 -0500, Paul Davis wrote:
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 1:37 AM, Rory Filer rfl...@gmail.com wrote:
[snip]
I think you've walked away with slightly the wrong message here.
[snip]
The only two servers
worth considering are PulseAudio or JACK and they are quite different.
On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 01:42 +0100, Julien Claassen wrote:
[snip] There are other
apps. I think even just mixer apps. I think most of them prefer JACK.
Kindly yours
Julien
Patrick Shirkey's jackEQ was (and I guess it still is ;) a simple, but
very usable and stable mixer and it
On Sun, 2010-11-14 at 06:27 -0500, Paul Davis wrote:
this would suggest that either you don't do panning automation
I'm not using the current SVN version of Rui's Qtractor, but yes, Qtractor
0.4.7 has got no automation.
On Sun, 2010-11-14 at 11:18 +, Rui Nuno Capela wrote:
My question:
On Sat, 2010-11-13 at 11:54 +0100, f...@kokkinizita.net wrote:
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 09:07:35AM +, Folderol wrote:
Why not go the whole hog and use a pre-calculated look-up table for the
whole
thing?
You only need to compute the L,R gains when they change.
Using a second order
On Sat, 2010-11-13 at 16:04 +0100, f...@kokkinizita.net wrote:
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 02:17:46PM +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Is there a 'most common value' for the centre?
Most will be -3..-4 dB. -6 dB definitely feels wrong.
Ciao,
Thank you :)
so I assume this is what I know from
On Sat, 2010-11-13 at 16:26 +0100, f...@kokkinizita.net wrote:
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 02:57:44PM +, Folderol wrote:
Paul Davis p...@linuxaudiosystems.com wrote:
there's an awful lot of math for which a modern processor can compute
the answer faster than it can look it up. this
myself, but for Qtractor this does a
good job. Don't trust my shot in the dark: Alternating voltage is
switching between 0 and it's max., hence it's higher, but the nominal
voltage by the factor of 1.41, perhaps it has to do with this issue.
On Nov 11, 2010, at 9:40 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote
On Fri, 2010-11-12 at 18:02 +0100, Guido Scholz wrote:
Am Tue, 09. Nov 2010 um 19:17:24 -0800 schrieb Kris C:
Yeah, I'd like to work for Google, but who doesn't right? :)
I am not sure about that.
This is the best comment on this list, written until now. Compliment!
I'm sure, but I'm not
On Fri, 2010-11-12 at 18:32 +0100, Dominique Michel wrote:
Le Fri, 12 Nov 2010 00:54:58 -0500,
Tim E. Real termt...@rogers.com a écrit :
On November 11, 2010 11:06:10 pm Dominique Michel wrote:
Le Thu, 11 Nov 2010 16:43:41 -0300,
Camilo Polymeris cpolyme...@gmail.com a écrit :
On Fri, 2010-11-12 at 20:00 +0100, f...@kokkinizita.net wrote:
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 10:40:33AM +0100, Jens M Andreasen wrote:
float l = sqrtf(1.0f - p)
float r = sqrtf(p)
Constant power, but the mapping from angles to L/R ratios is
not very good (the regions near full L or R are
On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 23:23 +0100, Arnold Krille wrote:
And some people do care about over-crowding our planet some more
and therefor have to pay bills;-)
;) Nice argumentation.
Btw. I'm not a FLOSS audio software coder anymore, but I was in the
90ies (never for Linux) and at this time I
Forwarded Message
From: Ralf Mardorf
To: Kris Calabio
Subject: Re: [LAD] What do you do for a living?
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 16:23:46 +0100
On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 15:06 -0800, Kris Calabio wrote:
Hmm, lot's of anti Google sentiment here? I'm afraid that I was sort
On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 20:22 -0800, Eric Kampman wrote:
Hello,
I'm writing a synth module on top of jack and I'm starting to contemplate
stereo.
I looked up pan law and understand that center should be -3 db (or some say
-3.5 or 4.5, whatever) given unity at panned hard L or R. It was
On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 21:31 +0100, Philipp Überbacher wrote:
Excerpts from Kris C's message of 2010-11-10 04:17:24 +0100:
Hi all,
I understand that a lot of you develop for free software and are
passionate at what you do. But how do you pay the bills? What do you
do for a living?
On Sun, 2010-10-10 at 17:59 +1300, Jeff McClintock wrote:
I do use licensed software. I am quite anti-piracy
If so, than pardon :). Anyway strange, a lot of the famous studios did
use Cubase without getting jitter for soft synth, today those studios do
use Nuendo. I never experienced jitter for
On Sun, 2010-10-10 at 14:39 +0200, David Olofson wrote:
On Sunday 10 October 2010, at 10.01.09, Ralf Mardorf
ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net wrote:
On Sun, 2010-10-10 at 17:59 +1300, Jeff McClintock wrote:
I do use licensed software. I am quite anti-piracy
If so, than pardon
On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 12:37 +0200, Jens M Andreasen wrote:
On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 10:12 +1300, Jeff McClintock wrote:
Cubase is particularly bad when playing a soft-synth live, esp with larger
audio buffer sizes, because ...
It could be useful to have some anecdotal evidence to quantify
Hi Rui :)
on Suse 11.2 updating from svn failed, so I deleted the directory and co
it completely new.
There were no issues with building and running Qtractor.
When Qtractor was opened, it did ignore my settings for the GUI. The
transport and display should be at the bottom, but they were at the
On Sun, 2010-10-03 at 17:22 -0700, Niels Mayer wrote:
Note that there's no such problems if I stick to just
MIDI via USB-connected MIDI converters talking to old-fashioned MIDI
synths and samplers
Is for transport loop sync now ok? For all 0.4.6.x installs on my
machine, external MIDI run out
On Fri, 2010-10-01 at 17:17 -0400, gene heskett wrote:
On Friday, October 01, 2010 05:12:54 pm Philipp Überbacher did opine:
Excerpts from gene heskett's message of 2010-10-01 22:07:28 +0200:
On Friday, October 01, 2010 04:05:37 pm Folderol did opine:
On Fri, 1 Oct 2010 09:51:29 +1000
On Thu, 2010-09-30 at 20:06 +0200, f...@kokkinizita.net wrote:
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 06:49:33PM +0100, Rui Nuno Capela wrote:
Qtractor 0.4.7 (furious desertrix) is out!
Furious Desertrix ? Does that mean it's going to bail out
at some time, and insult the user for it ?
Like
On Thu, 2010-09-30 at 19:56 +0100, Rui Nuno Capela wrote:
On 09/30/2010 07:20 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Thu, 2010-09-30 at 20:06 +0200, f...@kokkinizita.net wrote:
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 06:49:33PM +0100, Rui Nuno Capela wrote:
Qtractor 0.4.7 (furious desertrix) is out!
Furious
Pardon, I didn't follow the progress of envy24control. Did you finish
the recently development and if so, where can we/I get the latest source
code?
Cheers!
Ralf
___
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 08:40 -0700, Niels Mayer wrote:
Comments anybody :-)
http://techrights.org/2010/08/27/throwing-a-wrench-at-protools/
...
I have heard from a reliable source, inside Digidesign, that they
actually have Protools running on Linux, and that the port
Please take a look using Audacity regarding to the noise/ signal ratio,
at least -144dB IMO seems to be a little bit to bold for common Envy24
cards. I feared to reply earlier, because I know that my input sometimes
isn't wanted. I guess around - 90dB it becomes hard to differ between
noise and
On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 22:04 +0200, f...@kokkinizita.net wrote:
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 12:42:49PM -0700, Niels Mayer wrote:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 1:35 PM, f...@kokkinizita.net wrote:
Not really, EQ normally being pre-fader. Post-fader meters in a mixer
strip are useful only of the
On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 12:42 -0700, Niels Mayer wrote:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 1:35 PM, f...@kokkinizita.net wrote:
Not really, EQ normally being pre-fader. Post-fader meters in a mixer
strip are useful only of the signal being metered is actually one
that is physically available on some
On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 23:13 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 12:42 -0700, Niels Mayer wrote:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 1:35 PM, f...@kokkinizita.net wrote:
Not really, EQ normally being pre-fader. Post-fader meters in a mixer
strip are useful only of the signal being
On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 23:25 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 23:13 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 12:42 -0700, Niels Mayer wrote:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 1:35 PM, f...@kokkinizita.net wrote:
Not really, EQ normally being pre-fader. Post-fader meters
On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 09:09 +1000, Geoff Beasley wrote:
boyz,
as a longtime user of multiple ice1712 cards (4) in a 'multi' array, one
thing envy24contol never offered was a way of assembling or even
seeing multiple cards from within a single instance. You can of course
address different
On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 17:01 +0200, JohnLM wrote:
On 2010.07.29. 15:20, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Thursday, July 29, 2010 08:52:04 am Jörn Nettingsmeier did opine:
john,
On 07/29/2010 02:35 PM, JohnLM wrote:
So from what I can understand, if I apply doppler effect, distance
attenuation
On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 17:01 +0200, JohnLM wrote:
On 2010.07.29. 15:20, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Thursday, July 29, 2010 08:52:04 am Jörn Nettingsmeier did opine:
john,
On 07/29/2010 02:35 PM, JohnLM wrote:
So from what I can understand, if I apply doppler effect, distance
attenuation
On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 10:00 -0700, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 16:14 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 17:01 +0200, JohnLM wrote:
On 2010.07.29. 15:20, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Thursday, July 29, 2010 08:52:04 am Jörn Nettingsmeier did opine
On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 10:00 -0700, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 16:14 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 17:01 +0200, JohnLM wrote:
On 2010.07.29. 15:20, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Thursday, July 29, 2010 08:52:04 am Jörn Nettingsmeier did opine
On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 19:32 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 10:00 -0700, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 16:14 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 17:01 +0200, JohnLM wrote:
On 2010.07.29. 15:20, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Thursday, July
On Mon, 2010-07-26 at 20:15 -0400, Tim E. Real wrote:
On July 16, 2010 10:10:48 pm Tim E. Real wrote:
Here we go! snd_mixer_selem_get_playback_dB( )
Problem solved? Accurate or not?
Not accurate with AK4524 chip. Read on...
I've got two Terratec EWX 24/96, a while ago I checked the
On Tue, 2010-07-27 at 11:10 -0500, Charles Henry wrote:
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 11:30 PM, Jens M Andreasen
jens.andrea...@comhem.se wrote:
On Sun, 2010-07-25 at 14:24 +0200, Philipp Überbacher wrote:
It would be strange but funny if an estimate of sound A just about
masking sound B
On Tue, 2010-07-27 at 12:14 -0500, Charles Henry wrote:
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 11:57 AM, Ralf Mardorf
ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net wrote:
On Tue, 2010-07-27 at 11:10 -0500, Charles Henry wrote:
Because psychoacoustics just hasn't been defined in a way to make hard
numbers stick
On Tue, 2010-07-27 at 14:26 -0500, Charles Henry wrote:
To describe the things we can study ethically and scientifically, use
numbers. For everything else, use words :)
... words? ... yes, but add music, paintings, dance etc. ;)
Full ACK :).
Btw. the NAZIs did unethical experiments, while
On Tue, 2010-07-27 at 15:44 -0500, Charles Henry wrote:
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 12:38 PM, Ralf Mardorf
ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net wrote:
It's not impossible. I guess nobody is able to note, let's say, 10 000
pictures a second as single steps for a movie, of course you and I
aren't able
On Tue, 2010-07-27 at 23:06 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Tue, 2010-07-27 at 15:44 -0500, Charles Henry wrote:
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 12:38 PM, Ralf Mardorf
ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net wrote:
It's not impossible. I guess nobody is able to note, let's say, 10 000
pictures a second
Suse 11.2 amd64
TERRATEC EWX 24/96
No issues to build it.
The faders with the +4dBu -10dBV switch here are shorter too.
CPU usage when playing and showing the meters around 5%, max around 22%,
for 0.6.0 and 1.0.0.
CPU usage when playing and moving the DAC faders for 0.6.0 it's around
30%, but
On Mon, 2010-07-26 at 12:13 +0200, I wrote:
Suse 11.2 amd64
TERRATEC EWX 24/96
CPU usage when playing and moving the DAC faders for 0.6.0 it's around
30%, but for 1.0.0 it's 60%.
Pardon.
CPU usage when playing and moving the DAC faders for 0.6.0 it's 20%
25%, but for 1.0.0 it's 30%
On Mon, 2010-07-26 at 11:52 +0100, James Morris wrote:
On 26 July 2010 11:13, Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net wrote:
After the 'normal' output for both versions I get:
'(envy24control:9266): Gtk-WARNING **: GtkSpinButton: setting an
adjustment with non-zero page size
On Sun, 2010-07-25 at 03:31 -0400, Tim E. Real wrote:
Hey, you know that little triangular flap of skin that almost
covers the ear, just above the earlobe?
Whaddya think if humans are (were?) to evolve that
little flap so it can be completely and tightly pressed
against the ear (like
On Sun, 2010-07-25 at 03:31 -0400, Tim E. Real wrote:
Hey, you know that little triangular flap of skin that almost
covers the ear, just above the earlobe?
Whaddya think if humans are (were?) to evolve that
little flap so it can be completely and tightly pressed
against the ear (like
On Sun, 2010-07-25 at 03:31 -0400, Tim E. Real wrote:
Hey, you know that little triangular flap of skin that almost
covers the ear, just above the earlobe?
Whaddya think if humans are (were?) to evolve that
little flap so it can be completely and tightly pressed
against the ear (like
On Sun, 2010-07-25 at 12:32 +0200, lieven moors wrote:
On 07/25/2010 09:31 AM, Tim E. Real wrote:
Hey, you know that little triangular flap of skin that almost
covers the ear, just above the earlobe?
Whaddya think if humans are (were?) to evolve that
little flap so it can be
On Sun, 2010-07-25 at 13:28 +0200, Robin Gareus wrote:
On 07/25/2010 12:43 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Just one question. Am I the only one who received a mail similar to this
off-list:
[ yet more irrelvant mindless crap! ]
How does the external ear exactly work? Perhaps it's part
On Sun, 2010-07-25 at 17:40 +0200, f...@kokkinizita.net wrote:
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 05:21:17PM +0200, Jeremy Jongepier wrote:
There are some good mixes for stereo and mono, but at least I never
heard a valid mix with more but one ore two channels.
I've been to Jörn Nettingsmeier's
On Sun, 2010-07-25 at 18:03 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Sun, 2010-07-25 at 17:40 +0200, f...@kokkinizita.net wrote:
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 05:21:17PM +0200, Jeremy Jongepier wrote:
There are some good mixes for stereo and mono, but at least I never
heard a valid mix with more
On Fri, 2010-07-23 at 10:02 -0700, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
On Fri, 2010-07-23 at 08:51 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Fri, 2010-07-23 at 01:09 +0200, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
On 07/22/2010 08:42 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
one thing that often gets overlooked: people have learned
On Sat, 2010-07-24 at 10:37 +0200, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
On 07/22/2010 11:44 PM, f...@kokkinizita.net wrote:
Extrapolating a bit, that is one of the reasons why an
unamplified singer in an opera theatre can have a dramatic
effect that is much stronger than someone yelling into a
On Sat, 2010-07-24 at 10:52 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Sat, 2010-07-24 at 10:37 +0200, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
On 07/22/2010 11:44 PM, f...@kokkinizita.net wrote:
Extrapolating a bit, that is one of the reasons why an
unamplified singer in an opera theatre can have a dramatic
On Sat, 2010-07-24 at 11:25 +0200, f...@kokkinizita.net wrote:
On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 10:58:44AM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Apart from that studying this reveals a lot of how
our hearing system might actually work, which is an
interesting subject in itself.
That's true
On Sat, 2010-07-24 at 10:07 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
I have gotten up and left many a night club because the music was too
loud.
OT, but anyway: This is a big problem in Germany. I only visit night
clubs when a girlfriend 'force' me to do it and I always wear hearing
protection. Now it
On Sat, 2010-07-24 at 17:22 +0200, Arnold Krille wrote:
On Saturday 24 July 2010 16:22:29 Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Sat, 2010-07-24 at 10:07 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
I have gotten up and left many a night club because the music was too
loud.
OT, but anyway: This is a big problem
On Sat, 2010-07-24 at 17:44 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Sat, 2010-07-24 at 17:22 +0200, Arnold Krille wrote:
On Saturday 24 July 2010 16:22:29 Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Sat, 2010-07-24 at 10:07 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
I have gotten up and left many a night club because the music
On Sat, 2010-07-24 at 17:46 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Sat, 2010-07-24 at 17:44 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Sat, 2010-07-24 at 17:22 +0200, Arnold Krille wrote:
On Saturday 24 July 2010 16:22:29 Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Sat, 2010-07-24 at 10:07 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
I have
On Sat, 2010-07-24 at 18:16 +0200, Renato wrote:
On Sat, 24 Jul 2010 12:03:15 -0400
Gene Heskett gene.hesk...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, July 24, 2010 12:02:40 pm Ralf Mardorf did opine:
On Sat, 2010-07-24 at 17:22 +0200, Arnold Krille wrote:
On Saturday 24 July 2010 16:22:29
On Sat, 2010-07-24 at 12:33 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Saturday, July 24, 2010 12:31:32 pm Renato did opine:
On Sat, 24 Jul 2010 12:03:15 -0400
Gene Heskett gene.hesk...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, July 24, 2010 12:02:40 pm Ralf Mardorf did opine:
On Sat, 2010-07-24 at 17:22
On Sat, 2010-07-24 at 22:31 +0200, f...@kokkinizita.net wrote:
On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 02:58:36PM +0200, lieven moors wrote:
On 07/23/2010 10:23 PM, f...@kokkinizita.net wrote:
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 06:42:11PM +0200, lieven moors wrote:
On 07/23/2010 06:29 PM,
On Fri, 2010-07-23 at 01:09 +0200, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
On 07/22/2010 08:42 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
As an ape (of course I'm an ape like every human is an ape) and troll (I
don't see myself as a troll) I suspect phasing too, that's why I
overstated argued with the next generation
On Fri, 2010-07-23 at 08:51 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Fri, 2010-07-23 at 01:09 +0200, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
On 07/22/2010 08:42 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
As an ape (of course I'm an ape like every human is an ape) and troll (I
don't see myself as a troll) I suspect phasing too
On Fri, 2010-07-23 at 11:13 +0100, Frank Smith wrote:
Hi All
I was under the impression that every 3 db increase doubled the volume
and you needed to increase the power needed by a factor of 3 . Things
could have changed by now but this is what I use.
Cheers
Bob
I guess this was an old
On Fri, 2010-07-23 at 11:13 +0100, Frank Smith wrote:
Hi All
I was under the impression that every 3 db increase doubled the volume
and you needed to increase the power needed by a factor of 3 . Things
could have changed by now but this is what I use.
Cheers
Bob
And ... 1 KHz sine wave
On Fri, 2010-07-23 at 17:31 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Fri, 2010-07-23 at 11:13 +0100, Frank Smith wrote:
Hi All
I was under the impression that every 3 db increase doubled the volume
and you needed to increase the power needed by a factor of 3 . Things
could have changed by now
On Fri, 2010-07-23 at 17:37 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Fri, 2010-07-23 at 17:31 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Fri, 2010-07-23 at 11:13 +0100, Frank Smith wrote:
Hi All
I was under the impression that every 3 db increase doubled the volume
and you needed to increase the power needed
On Wed, 2010-07-21 at 17:45 -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
if that won't work for you, then perhaps you might want to visit any
of the theaters outfitted by these guys:
http://www.iosono-sound.com/references/installations/
The nearest to Oberhausen is http://www.odysseum.de/, unfortunately it's
On Thu, 2010-07-22 at 01:04 +0200, Arnold Krille wrote:
We are not talking about 5.1 or 7.1 here. These suck big time.
We are talking about ambisonics vs. binaurals vs. simple stereo here!
Ok, I noticed this.
Fon's AmbDec is the player for the files from
http://www.ambisonia.com/?!
I guess
On Thu, 2010-07-22 at 10:52 -0700, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
On Thu, 2010-07-22 at 14:01 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Thu, 2010-07-22 at 01:04 +0200, Arnold Krille wrote:
We are not talking about 5.1 or 7.1 here. These suck big time.
We are talking about ambisonics vs. binaurals
On Thu, 2010-07-22 at 14:15 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Thursday, July 22, 2010 01:07:57 pm f...@kokkinizita.net did opine:
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 10:35:15AM -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Chris Cannam
can...@all-day-breakfast.com wrote:
Question
On Thu, 2010-07-22 at 21:31 +0200, lieven moors wrote:
On 07/21/2010 07:24 PM, Fons Adriaensen-2 wrote:
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 01:05:01AM +0200, Philipp Überbacher wrote:
I think the word loudness is a problem here. Afaik it usually
refers to
how it is perceived, and twice the
On Thu, 2010-07-22 at 13:56 -0700, James Warden wrote:
This is
probably closer to the object size comparison.
I wonder how well we can judge something like twice the
brightness.
--
or smelling a perfume twice stronger :)
Because the impression of loudness is a mix of 'taste' and
On Thu, 2010-07-22 at 23:53 +0200, Philipp Überbacher wrote:
Excerpts from fons's message of 2010-07-22 23:24:24 +0200:
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 01:56:41PM -0700, James Warden wrote:
This is
probably closer to the object size comparison.
I wonder how well we can judge something
On Wed, 2010-07-21 at 20:01 +0200, f...@kokkinizita.net wrote:
An audio signal represents pressure variation as a function of
time. Multiplying it by two will give 2 times the pressure,
and 4 times the power. The subjective result is another matter.
Subjective double loudness is around 6 dB,
On Wed, 2010-07-21 at 20:19 +0200, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
On 07/21/2010 08:56 PM, JohnLM wrote:
If I code program to handle attenuation of sounds depending on their
source (emitter) position in virtual 3D space, I guess then there's no
simple way to relate the effect to real world.
matter? (are they equivalent?)
On 2010.07.21. 20:40, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
I guess the transit time issue for analog isn't solved. When I worked
for Brauner we and SPL developed a surround microphone + SPL mixing
console. IMO it's pure bullshit.
http://audio.uni-lueneburg.de
People today aren't able to do a good stereo or mono mix, e.g. because
of the loudness war, but they are thinking of doing 3D mixes.
I'm unable to follow this strange evolution.
We all have 2 ears and 1 brain that has to do a lot of work, regarding
to information from the sense organs. The brain
301 - 400 of 960 matches
Mail list logo
